TAXOPETIC Process Design - A Taxonomy to Support the PETIC Methodology (Strategic Planning of ICT)

Adriana de Melo Fontes, Denisson Santana dos Santos, Thauane Moura Garcia, Michel dos Santos Soares, Rogério Patrício Chagas do Nascimento

2017

Abstract

Innovations in organizations require better solutions for technology improvement, quality assurance and customers’ business satisfaction. On the other hand, Strategic Planning (SP) and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) need to be integrated and coherent, to ensure the survival of organizations. In this context, the Strategic Planning of ICT Methodology (PETIC) is a SP that carefully helps managers to identify the maturity of ICT processes required for company management. The increasing number of PETIC methodology applications in organizations has made it difficult to locate and classify the PETIC artifacts produced. Moreover, the use of taxonomies has been successfully applied for classification and information retrieval. This paper aims on proposing TAXOPETIC, the taxonomy to support the PETIC Methodology. It will also be used to implement a software called TAXOPETICWeb that will allow storage and classification of PETIC artifacts, as well as facilitate the process of searching these artifacts.

References

  1. Palmeira, J., Neto, A. C., Nascimento, R. P. C do. PETIC Wizard Proposal: a Software Tool for Support PETIC Methodology. In EATIS 2012 Conference. Spain 2012.
  2. Cassidy, A. A Practical Guide to Information Systems Strategic Planning. Washington: St. Lucie Press, 1998.
  3. Marchi, L. de; Cassimiro, A.; Nascimento, R. P. C. do. Suggestions for PETIC 2.0: New Framework, Maturity Levels and Strategic Aligment. In EATIS 2010 - Euro-American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems. Panama, 2010.
  4. Palmeira, J., Neto, A. C., Nascimento, R. P. C do. PETIC 3.0 Proposal: Upgrading an ICT Strategic Planning Methodology. CONTECSI. 2015.
  5. Bailey, K. D. Typologies and taxonomes: an introduction to classification techniques. New Bury Park: SAGE, 1994. 96 p.
  6. Svahnberg, M., Gorschek T., Feldt R., Torkar R., Saleem S. B., Shafique M. U. A systematic review on strategic release planning models. in Information and Software Technology, 2010. Butterworth-Heinemann Newton, MA, USA, Volume 52, Issue 3, March 2010.
  7. Pradhan, A.; Akinci, B. A taxonomy of reasoning mechanisms and data synchronization framework for road excavation productivity monitoring. Advanced Engineering Informatics 26 (2012) 563-573. USA, 2012.
  8. Dukaric, R.; Juric, M. B. Towards a unified taxonomy and architecture of cloud frameworks. Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (2013) 1196-1210. Slovenia, 2013.
  9. Gilchrist, A., Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies - an etymological note, Journal of Documentation, 2003., Vol. 59 Iss: 1, pp.7 - 18.
  10. Reamy, T. (2007). Taxonomy Development in Enterprise. Retrieved December 22, 2014, from <http://www.kapsgroup.com/presentations/Taxonomy Development in Enterprise.ppt>.
  11. Delphi Group White Paper. Taxonomy and content classification. 2002. November 11, 2015, from <http://goo.gl/xyvoz2>.
  12. Dutra, J., Busch, J. Enabling knowledge discovery: taxonomy development for NASA. 2003. November 22, 2015, from <http://goo.gl/xumM7J>.
  13. Woods, E. The corporate taxonomy: creating a new order. KMWorld, Camden, v.13, n. 7, July/Aug. November 22, 2015, from <http://goo.gl/88guHh>.
  14. Kremer, S., Kolbe, L. M.; Brenner, W. Towards a procedure model in terminology management. Journal of documentation, Bingley, v. 61, n. 2, p. 281- 295, 2005. November 22, 2015, from <http://goo.gl/v8pbSc>.
  15. Bayona-Oré, S., Calvo-Manzano, J. A., Cuevas, G., & San-feliu, T. (2014). Critical success factors taxonomy for software process deployment. Software Quality Journal, 22, 21-48. doi:10.1007/s11219-012-9190-y.
  16. Linfoot, S. L.; Coughlin, T.M.; Cowell, J., A need for improved standardization of metadata for consumer devices, in Consumer Electronics, 2009. ISCE 2009. IEEE 13th International Symposium on , vol., no., pp.196-200, 25-28 May 2009.
  17. Drupal - Content Management Software. 2015. November 15, 2015, from <https://www.drupal.org/>.
  18. Drupal - Organizing content with taxonomies. 2016. November 10, 2015, from <https://goo.gl/b6t4AI>.
  19. MySql - About MySQL. November 12, 2015, from <https://www.mysql.com/about/>.
  20. Shaw, M. What makes good research in software engineering?, International Journal of Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2002, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-7.
  21. Nielsen, Jakob. How to Conduct a Heuristic Evaluation. January 1, 1995, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-conduct-aheuristic-evaluation/.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Fontes A., Santos D., Garcia T., Soares M. and Nascimento R. (2017). TAXOPETIC Process Design - A Taxonomy to Support the PETIC Methodology (Strategic Planning of ICT) . In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-248-6, pages 387-394. DOI: 10.5220/0006324303870394


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis17,
author={Adriana de Melo Fontes and Denisson Santana dos Santos and Thauane Moura Garcia and Michel dos Santos Soares and Rogério Patrício Chagas do Nascimento},
title={TAXOPETIC Process Design - A Taxonomy to Support the PETIC Methodology (Strategic Planning of ICT)},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,},
year={2017},
pages={387-394},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006324303870394},
isbn={978-989-758-248-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,
TI - TAXOPETIC Process Design - A Taxonomy to Support the PETIC Methodology (Strategic Planning of ICT)
SN - 978-989-758-248-6
AU - Fontes A.
AU - Santos D.
AU - Garcia T.
AU - Soares M.
AU - Nascimento R.
PY - 2017
SP - 387
EP - 394
DO - 10.5220/0006324303870394