A Literature Review of Benefit Analysis Approaches for IT Projects in the Public Sector

Oscar Avila, Sebastian Sastoque, Orlando Cuevas

Abstract

The financial investments of public institutions in Information Technology (IT) projects have considerably increased in recent years. This has resulted in an enormous pressure on IT managers of these institutions to find ways to analyse the benefits of these investments. However, this task is very difficult because, in the public sector, IT projects do not only generate financial benefits but also create public value through the generation of other types of benefits, such as social and political. In addition, in this sector there is a variety of beneficiaries and manners of measure the benefits. In this context, this work presents a survey aimed at analysing the research literature to analyse what are the main types of benefits and beneficiaries as well as analysing methods. From the literature review, the paper presents a conceptual model that aims at establishing the basis for a complete approach for benefit analysis in the public sector.

References

  1. Al-Raisi, A. N. and Al-Khouri, A. M. (2010). Public value and roi in the government sector. Advances in Management, 3(2):33-38.
  2. Ashurst, C., Doherty, N. F., and Peppard, J. (2008). Improving the impact of it development projects: the benefits realization capability model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(4):352-370.
  3. Australian Government Information Service (2004). Demand & value assessment methodology for better government services. online.
  4. Avila, O. and Sastoque, S. (2016). A survey on availability calculation and definition for information technology services. In 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2016).
  5. B├ęzivin, J. (2005). On the unification power of models. Software & Systems Modeling, 4(2):171-188.
  6. Bhagwat, S., Berg, R. C., et al. (1992). Benefits and costs of geologic mapping programs in illinois: case study of boone and winnebago counties and its statewide applicability. Circular no. 549.
  7. Booz, Allen, and Hamilton (2002). Value measuring methodology: How to guide. The Federal Chief Information Officer (CIO) Council .
  8. Cresswell, A. M., Burke, G. B., and Pardo, T. (2006). Advancing return on investment, analysis for government IT: a public value framework. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY.
  9. Davern, M. b. c. and Kauffman, R. e. f. g. (2000). Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4):121-143.
  10. Devaraj, S. and Kohli, R. (2000). Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4):41-67.
  11. Di Maio, A. (2003). New performance framework measures public value of it. Gartner, Stamford, CT.
  12. Emerson, J., Wachowicz, J., and Chun, S. (2000). Social return on investment: Exploring aspects of value creation in the nonprofit sector. The Box Set: Social Purpose Enterprises and Venture Philanthropy in the New Millennium, 2:130-173.
  13. French Agency for the Development of Electronic Administration (2005). Mareva methodology guide: Analysis of the value of adele projects. Internal Document.
  14. Hinton, M. and Kaye, R. (2006). Investing in information technology: a lottery? Introducing Information Management: the business approach, page 198.
  15. Kleis, L., Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R., and Cockburn, I. (2012). Information technology and intangible output: The impact of it investment on innovation productivity. Information Systems Research, 23(1):42-59.
  16. Kohli, R., Devaraj, S., and Ow, T. (2012). Does information technology investment influence a firm's market value? a case of non-publicly traded healthcare firms. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(4):1145-1164.
  17. Lin, C. and Pervan, G. (2003). The practice of is/it benefits management in large australian organizations. Information & Management, 41(1):13-24.
  18. Love, P. E. and Irani, Z. (2004). An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of smes in the construction industry. Information & Management, 42(1):227-242.
  19. MacCarthaigh, M. (2008). Public service values. Institute of Public Administration.
  20. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Social Science Open Access Repository.
  21. North Ireland Financial Department (2016). Identifying and structuring programme and project benefits. online.
  22. Otim, S., Dow, K., Grover, V., and Wong, J. (2012). The impact of information technology investments on downside risk of the firm: Alternative measurement of the business value of it. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(1):159-194.
  23. Pollock, R., Aldridge, S., and Lowe, J. (2014). Supporting public service transformation: Cost benefit analysis guidance for local partnerships.
  24. Project Management Institute (2001). Project management body of knowledge (pmbok R guide).
  25. Remenyi, D., White, T., and Sherwood-Smith, M. (1997). Achieving maximum value from information systems: a process approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  26. Rothig, P. (2011). Wibe 4.1: Recommendations on economic efficiency assessments in the german federal administration. KBSt Publication Series, 92.
  27. Sabherwal, R. and Jeyaraj, A. (2015). Information technology impacts on firm performance: An extension of kohli and devaraj (2003). MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 39(4):809-836.
  28. Standing, C. and Lin, C. (2007). Organizational evaluation of the benefits, constraints, and satisfaction of business-to-business electronic commerce. International Journal of electronic commerce, 11(3):107- 134.
  29. Tambe, P. and Hitt, L. (2012). The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from it labor data. Information Systems Research, 23(3 PART 1):599-617.
  30. US Executive Office for President (2007). Fea consolidated reference model document version 2.3. online.
  31. Vaughan, J. L., Leming, M. L., Liu, M., and Jaselskis, E. (2012). Cost-benefit analysis of construction information management system implementation: Case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4):445-455.
  32. Ward, J., Murray, P., and Daniel, E. (1997). Benefits management: Best practice guidelines. Cranfield School of Management, Information Systems Research Centre.
  33. Ward, J., Taylor, P., and Bond, P. (1996). Evaluation and realisation of is/it benefits: an empirical study of current practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(4):214-225.
  34. Ward, J. M., Daniel, E. M., and Peppard, J. (2008). Building better business cases for it investments. MIS Quarterly Executive, 7.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Avila O., Sastoque S. and Cuevas O. (2017). A Literature Review of Benefit Analysis Approaches for IT Projects in the Public Sector . In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-248-6, pages 411-418. DOI: 10.5220/0006333204110418


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis17,
author={Oscar Avila and Sebastian Sastoque and Orlando Cuevas},
title={A Literature Review of Benefit Analysis Approaches for IT Projects in the Public Sector},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,},
year={2017},
pages={411-418},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006333204110418},
isbn={978-989-758-248-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,
TI - A Literature Review of Benefit Analysis Approaches for IT Projects in the Public Sector
SN - 978-989-758-248-6
AU - Avila O.
AU - Sastoque S.
AU - Cuevas O.
PY - 2017
SP - 411
EP - 418
DO - 10.5220/0006333204110418