Electronic Notes Via Jupyter Notebooks

Irene Urcelay-Olabarria, Josu M. Igartua


Nowadays there are many tools to teach, both analogical and electronic. In our classes we use either tools: slides (and their xerox copies), computer driven presentations, videos, exercise bundles, calendar of the subject, syllabus, blackboard, detailed program of the subject... In the teaching/studying process there are to reference systems: the teacher’s and the students’. In the former, it is the teacher who knows the subject and has designed it, whereas in the latter the students should acquire the competences relative to the module, grade... To that end, the students should follow the teacher’s indications and use the materials we give them directly or indirectly. Unfortunately, the students, in their reference system, and due to the way teachers do our job, do not have any linear narrative threat facilitating the acquisition of the knowledge and competences. In this communication we present a tool, the electronic notes via Jupyter notebooks, which provides the students with a linear narrative threat based on a static initial schema but adaptable to each student, and modifiable and extensible by each student, being executable as well.


  1. Blundell, S. J. and Blundell, K. M. (2006). Concepts in Thermal Physics. OXFORD University Press Inc., New York, 2007 reprint edition.
  2. Bohay, M., Blakely, D. P., Tamplin, A. K., and Radvansky, G. A. (2011). Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension. The American Journal of Psychology, 124(1):63-73.
  3. Bretzing, B. H. (1979). Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4(2):145-153.
  4. Bretzing, B. H. and Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Note-taking and passage style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2):242-250.
  5. Brown, C. M. L. (1988). Comparison of typing and handwriting in two-finger typists. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 32(5):381-385.
  6. Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., and Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2):299-309.
  7. Callen, H. B. (1987). Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 4th edition.
  8. Hembrooke, H. and Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1):46-64.
  9. Jupyter (2017). The jupyter notebook. http://jupyternotebook.readthedocs.io/en/latest/notebook.html.
  10. Kittel, C. and Kroemer, H. (1996). Thermal Physics. W. H. Freeman adn Company, New York, 2nd, 28th printing edition.
  11. Mueller, P. A. and Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard. Psychological Science, 25(6):1159-1168. PMID: 24760141.
  12. Pathria, R. K. (1996). Statistical Mechanics. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Amsterdamn, 2nd, 2006 reprint edition.
  13. Stacy, E. M. and Cain, J. (2015). Note-taking and handouts in the digital age. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(7):1-6.
  14. Zemansky, M. W. and Dittman, R. H. (1991). Heat and Thermodynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 6th edition.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Urcelay-Olabarria I. and Igartua J. (2017). Electronic Notes Via Jupyter Notebooks . In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-239-4, pages 464-469. DOI: 10.5220/0006352204640469

in Bibtex Style

author={Irene Urcelay-Olabarria and Josu M. Igartua},
title={Electronic Notes Via Jupyter Notebooks},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - Electronic Notes Via Jupyter Notebooks
SN - 978-989-758-239-4
AU - Urcelay-Olabarria I.
AU - Igartua J.
PY - 2017
SP - 464
EP - 469
DO - 10.5220/0006352204640469