A Multi-perspective View on AAL Stakeholders’ Needs - A User-centred Requirement Analysis for the Activeadvice European Project

Soraia Teles, Diotima Bertel, Andrea Ch. Kofler, Stefan H. Ruscher, Constança Paúl

Abstract

This paper discusses the process of including a multi-perspective view on stakeholders’ needs into a specific project, namely the European project ActiveAdvice. It highlights the factors supporting and hindering the development and the implementation of the ActiveAdvice platform – as an integrated communication tool targeted at bridging the gaps between AAL stakeholders by facilitating cooperation and information exchange – regarding user requirements, preferences, acceptances and expectations. For this, a qualitative study was carried out, taking into account not only the older adults as primary end-users but the whole AAL stakeholder ecosystem. 23 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders of different groups – older adults and their relatives, business as well as government representatives – were conducted. The results show that even though different stakeholders can have conflicting needs, e.g. regarding online communication or feedback, those can be integrated into the requirements analysis, thus including the whole stakeholder ecosystem in the designing process. Furthermore, all three included stakeholder groups agree on the importance of raising awareness of AAL solutions, technologies and products. In including not only consumers but other secondary and tertiary stakeholders as well, ActiveAdvice has the chance to reach a broader audience and thus raise public awareness of AAL.

References

  1. AAL Programme (2014). Stategy 2014-2020 for the Active and Assisted Living Programme. Retrieved from: http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015 /11/20151001-AAL-Strategy_Final.pdf
  2. Balta-Ozkan, N., Davidson, R., Bicket, M., & Whitmarsh, L. (2013). Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes. In Energy Policy, 63, 363-374. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.043
  3. Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70.
  4. Begley, P. (2010). 360 degrees of care. In Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 11(4), 47-50. doi:10.5042/qiaoa.2010.0717
  5. Budinich, V., K. M. Reott, and S. Schmidt. 2007. Hybrid Value Chains: Social Innovations and the Development of the Small Farmer Irrigation Market in Mexico. In Business Solutions for the Global Poor: Creating Social and Economic Value, edited by V. Kasturi Rangan, J. A. Quelch, G. Herrero, and B. Barton. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Bygholm, A., & Kanstrup, A. M. (2015). The Living Challenge of Ambient Assisted Living - a literature review. In Proceedings of the 13th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics, June 15-17, 2015, Tromsø, Norway.
  7. Calvaresi, D., Cesarini, D., Sernani, P., Marinoni, M., Dragoni, A. F., & Sturm, A. (2016). Exploring the ambient assisted living domain: a systematic review. In Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. doi:10.1007/s12652-016-0374-3
  8. Camarinha-Matos, L. M.,, Rosas, J., Oliviera, A. I., and Ferrarda, F. (2015). Care Services Ecosystem for Ambient Assisted Living. In Enterprise Information Systems, 9(5-6), 607-633.
  9. Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W.-S., Gilbert, J. E., and Shim, Sh. (2011). Virtual agents in ecommerce: representational characteristics for seniors. In Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5(4), 276-297.
  10. Cherns, A. (1976). The principles of sociotechnical design. In Human Relation, 29 (8), 783-792.
  11. Clark, J., & McGee Lennon, M. (2011). A stakeholder centred exploration of the current barriers to the uptake of home care technology in the UK. In Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5(1), 12-25. doi:10.5042/jat.2011.0097
  12. Cunha, D., Trevisan, G., Samagaio, F., Ferreira, L., Sousay, F., Ferreira-Alves, J., & Simoes, R. (2013). Ambient Assisted Living Technology: Comparative perspectives of users and caregivers. In 2013 IEEE 15th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom 2013). doi:10.1109/healthcom.2013.6720635
  13. Damodaran, L., & Olphert, W. (2010). User Responses to Assisted Living Technologies (ALTs) - A Review of the Literature. In Journal of Integrated Care, 18(2), 25-32. doi:10.5042/jic.2010.0133
  14. Doyle, J., Bailey, C., Ni Scanaill, C., & van den Berg, F. (2013). Lessons learned in deploying independent living technologies to older adults' homes. In Universal Access in the Information Society. doi:10.1007/s10209-013- 0308-1
  15. Ehrenhard, M., Kijl, B., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2014). Market adoption barriers of multi-stakeholder technology: Smart homes for the aging population. In Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 306-315.
  16. Finn, R. L., & Wright, D. (2011). Mechanisms for stakeholder co ordination in ICT and ageing. In Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 9(4), 265-286. doi:10.1108/ 14779961111191066
  17. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. B. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. In Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.
  18. Frooman J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. In Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1999.1893928
  19. Garschall, M., Neureiter, K., Hallewell, J., Bertel, D., Krainer, D., Moser, C. 2016. Investigating usercentered design practices in Austrian AAL projects. In Proceedings of Smarter Lives.
  20. Graybill EM, McMeekin P, Wildman J. Can aging in place be cost effective? A systematic review. In PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102705
  21. Gudowsky N., Sotoudeh, M. (2015). Citizens' visions on active assisted living. In Studies on Health Technology and Informatics, 212, 43-9.
  22. Kriegel, J., Schmitt-Rüth, S., Güntert, B., & Mallory, P. (2013). New service development in German and Austrian health care - bringing e-health services into the market. In International Journal of Healthcare Management, 6(2), 77-86. doi:10.1179/ 2047971913y.0000000034
  23. Lambooij, M. S., & Hummel, M. J. (2013). Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care. In BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(1), 91. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-91
  24. Leonardi, C., Mennecozzi, C., Not, E., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M. (2008). Getting older people involved in the process of ambient assisted living research and development. In Proceedings of the International Symposium of Gerontechnology ISG08, 7(2). doi:10.4017/gt.2008.07.02.089.00
  25. Lewin, D., Adshead, S., Glennon, B., Williamson, B., Moore, T., Damodaran, L., & Hansell, P. (2010). Assisted living technologies for older and disabled people in 2030. In Annexes to a draft final report to Ofcom. Plum Consulting, London. Retrieved from: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033 /44889/assistedannexes.pdf
  26. Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G., & Olivier, P. (2012, May). Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1199-1208.
  27. Mao, J. Y., Vredenburg, K., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2005). The state of user-centered design practice. In Communications of the ACM, 48(3), 105-109.
  28. Marschollek, M., Mix, S., Wolf, K.-H., Effertz, B., Haux, R., & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (2007). ICT-based health information services for elderly people: Past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. In Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 32(4), 251-261.
  29. McGee-Lennon, M. R., Wolters, M. K., & Brewster, S. (2011, May). User-centred multimodal reminders for assistive living. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2105-2114.
  30. Michel, J. & Franco, A. (2014). Geriatricians and Technology. In JAMDA 15, 860-862. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269179860_ Geriatricians_and_Technology
  31. Moschetti, A., Fiorini, L., Aquilano, M., Cavallo, F., & Dario, P. (2014). Preliminary Findings of the AALIANCE2 Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap. In Ambient Assisted Living, 335-342. doi:10.1007/978-3- 319-01119-6_34
  32. Murray E, Burns J, May C, Finch T, O'Donnell C, Wallace P, Mair F. (2011) Why is it difficult to implement ehealth initiatives? A qualitative study. In Implementation Science, 6(6). doi: 10.1186/1748- 5908-6-6
  33. Nedopil, C., Schauber, C. & Glende I. (2013). AAL stakeholders and their requirement. In Report by the Ambient and Assisted Living Association.
  34. Nordgren, A. (2013). Personal health monitoring: ethical considerations for stakeholders. In Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 11(3), 156-173. doi:10.1108/jices-06-2013-0015
  35. Novitzky, P., Smeaton, A. F., Chen, C., Irving, K., Jacquemard, T., O'Brolcháin, F., Gordijn, B. (2015). A Review of Contemporary Work on the Ethics of Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for People with Dementia. In Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 707-765. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9552-x
  36. Obal, M., & Kunz, W. (2013). Trust development in eservices: a cohort analysis of Millennials and Baby Boomers. In Journal of Service Management, 24(1), 45-63.
  37. Olphert, W., Damodaran, L., Balatsoukas, P., & Parkinson, C. (2009). Process requirements for building sustainable digital assistive technology for older people. In Journal of Assistive Technologies, 3(3), 4-13
  38. Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J., Luijkx, K. G., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2016). What it Takes to Successfully Implement Technology for Aging in Place: Focus Groups With Stakeholders. In Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(5), e98. doi:10.2196/jmir.5253
  39. Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. In International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235-248.
  40. Perumal, T., Ramli, A.R., Leong, C.Y., 2011. Interoperability framework for smart home systems. In IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 57, 1607-1611
  41. Peruzzini, M., & Germani, M. (2014). Designing a usercentred ICT platform for active aging. In 2014 IEEE/ASME 10th International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA). doi:10.1109/mesa.2014.6935624
  42. Queirós, A., Cerqueira, M., Martins, A. I., Silva, A. G., Alvarelhão, J., Teixeira, A., & Rocha, N. P. (2014). ICF Inspired Personas to Improve Development for Usability and Accessibility in Ambient Assisted Living. In Procedia Computer Science, 27, 409-418.
  43. Reginatto B.M.B (2012). Understanding barriers to wider telehealth adoption in the home environment of older people: An exploratory study in the Irish context. In Journal of Advanced Life Science, 4(3&4), 63-76.
  44. Rickel, J. & Johnson, W. L. (2000). Task-oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds. In Cassell, J., Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E.F. (Eds), Embodied Conversational Agents, MIT Press, Boston, 95-122.
  45. Röcker, C. (2013). User-centered design of intelligent environments: requirements for designing successful ambient assisted living systems. In Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems. Faculty of Organization and Informatics Varazdin, 4- 11.
  46. Ruscher, S. H., Burger, J., Sauli, E., & Kofler, A. C. (2016). Implementing WCAG and ISO 9241 in AAL software applications-A case study. In Technologies for Active and Assisted Living (TechAAL 2016), 2nd IET International Conference on, 1-6. IET. doi: 10.1049/ic.2016.0057
  47. Sanders, C., Rogers, A., Bowen, R., Bower, P., Hirani, S., Cartwright, M. & Newman, S. P. (2012). Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. In BMC Health Services Research, 12(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-220
  48. Siegel, C., Prazak-Aram, B., Kropf, J., Kundi, M., & Dorner, T. (2014). Evaluation of a modular scalable system for silver-ager located in assisted living homes in Austria - study protocol of the ModuLAAr ambient assisted living project. In BMC Public Health, 14(1).
  49. Sponselee, A., Schouten, B., Bouwhuis, D., & Willems, C. (2007). Smart Home Technology for the Elderly: Perceptions of Multidisciplinary Stakeholders. In Constructing Ambient Intelligence, 314-326. doi:10.1007/978- 3-540-85379-4_37
  50. Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E., Nijland, N., van Limburg, M., Ossebaard, H. C., Kelders, S. M., Eysenbach, G., & Seydel, E. R. (2011). A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies. In Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e111.
  51. Van Hoof, J., Kort, H. S. M., Rutten, P. G. S., & Duijnstee, M. S. H. (2011). Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users. In International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(5), 310- 331. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.010
  52. Vasunilashorn, S., Steinman, B. A., Liebig, P. S., & Pynoos, J. (2012). Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come. In Journal of Aging Research, 1-6. doi:10.1155/2012/120952
  53. Wright, D. (2010). Structuring stakeholder einclusion needs. In Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 8(2), 178-205. doi:10.1108/ 14779961011040587
  54. Youngtae Ch., and Thoeni, A. (2016). Social media: is this the new organizational stepchild? In European Business Review, 28(1), 21-38.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Teles S., Bertel D., Ch. Kofler A., H. Ruscher S. and Paúl C. (2017). A Multi-perspective View on AAL Stakeholders’ Needs - A User-centred Requirement Analysis for the Activeadvice European Project . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - Volume 1: ICT4AWE, ISBN 978-989-758-251-6, pages 104-116. DOI: 10.5220/0006380701040116


in Bibtex Style

@conference{ict4awe17,
author={Soraia Teles and Diotima Bertel and Andrea Ch. Kofler and Stefan H. Ruscher and Constança Paúl},
title={A Multi-perspective View on AAL Stakeholders’ Needs - A User-centred Requirement Analysis for the Activeadvice European Project},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - Volume 1: ICT4AWE,},
year={2017},
pages={104-116},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006380701040116},
isbn={978-989-758-251-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - Volume 1: ICT4AWE,
TI - A Multi-perspective View on AAL Stakeholders’ Needs - A User-centred Requirement Analysis for the Activeadvice European Project
SN - 978-989-758-251-6
AU - Teles S.
AU - Bertel D.
AU - Ch. Kofler A.
AU - H. Ruscher S.
AU - Paúl C.
PY - 2017
SP - 104
EP - 116
DO - 10.5220/0006380701040116