
Rule. This column is used to define when 
performance of the activity requires that one or more 
rules must be fulfilled. Rule is a precise statement 
that defines a constraint, which must be satisfied in 
order for a certain activity to be executed.  
Input/Output.
 This column is used to indicate 
which inputs or outputs are connected with the 
activity described.  
Cost
. This column is the sum of the costs of the 
resources needed to accomplish an activity. This 
parameter is used to calculate the cost of work and 
business processes and therefore is important in 
improving business processes.  
Developing the activity and property tables is an 
iterative process. Some of the interviews have to be 
repeated to arrive at a precise understanding of the 
user’s work. If anything is misunderstood, then we 
have to organize new interviews with the responsible 
users until everything is clear. 
Surgery. Because of space limitations, only ten 
activities defined in the activity table are described 
in detail in the property table, Table 1. The values 
shown in the column Time in Table 1 are 
approximate values obtained from the medical staff. 
Unfortunately, we could not get any information 
concerning the costs of the listed activities from the 
management of the hospital.    
5 CONCLUSIONS 
The aim of this paper was to introduce a technique, 
which enables the analyst to overcome problems of 
business process modelling. 
Business process modelling is solved 
successfully by developing the activity table 
technique, which requires that each activity, 
identified in the framework of the process, has to be 
linked with its resource and its successor activity. 
This is achieved by using horizontal and vertical 
linkages. Connecting the activities to their 
performers (resources) represents a new dimension 
in process modelling, which contribute a great deal 
in leading the modeller to identify the activities as 
the occur in the real world and to develop a process 
model that represents a true reflection of reality of 
the business process discussed. 
Such a model enables us to continue with 
business process improvement, which is carried on 
by analyzing the activity table. This table could be 
divided the table into clear, manageable, and easy to 
understand subtables. Analysing is essential in 
discovering improvements, removing obstacles, 
shortening time, reducing cost, and solving other 
problems of the business process discussed.  
REFERENCES 
Ackerman, F., Walls, L., Meer, R., Boorman, M. (1999). 
Taking a Strategic View of BPR to Develop a 
Multidisciplinary Framework. Journal of Operational 
Research Society,  195-204. 
Aguilar-Saven, R. (2001). Business Process Modelling 
techniques and tools. Department of Production 
Economics, WP291 Linkoping Sweden.  
Aguilar-Saven, R. (2003). Business Process Modeling. 
Review and Framework. International Journal of 
Production Economics, Vol. 90, No. 2, 129–149. 
Aguilar-Saven, R., Olhager, J. (2002). Integration of 
Product, Process and Functional Orientations. 
Principles and a Case Study. Preprints of the 
International Conference on Advanced Production 
Management Systems, APMS 2002 IFIP The 
Netherlands September.  
Anapindi, R., Chopra, S., Deshmukh, S. D., van Mieghem, 
J.A., Zemel, E. (1999). Managing Business Process 
Flows. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pretence Hall.  
Armistead, C.G., Rowland, P. (1996). Managing Business 
Processes: BPR and Beyond. Chichester John Wiley & 
Sons.  
Chan, M. (2002). A Framework to Develop an Enterprise 
Information Portal for Contract Manufacturing. 
International Journal of Production Economics, 75 
(1–2), 113–126. 
Damij, T. (2000). An Object-Oriented Methodology for 
Information Systems Development and Business 
Process Reengineering. Journal of Object-Oriented 
Programming, Vol. 13, No. 4, 23-34.  
Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation: 
Reengineering Work through Information Technology, 
Harvard Business School Press, Boston.  
Davenport, T.H., Short, J. (1990). The New Industrial 
Engineering: Information Technology and Business 
Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31 
No. 4, 11–27. 
Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don’t 
automate. Obliterate. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 
68 No. 4, 104–112. 
Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the 
Corporation, A Manifesto for Business Revolution. 
New York, USA.  
Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.TC., Guha, S. (1997). Business 
Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, 
Techniques and Tools. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, 55-80. 
Martinez, M., et al. (2001). Virtual Enterprise – 
Organisation, Evolution and Control. International 
Journal of Production Economics, 74 (1 – 3), 225–
238. 
Laguna, M, Marklund, J. (2005). Business Process 
Modeling, Simulation, and Design. Pearson Education 
Inc., New Jersey.  
Watson H.G. (1994). Business Systems Engineering. 
Managing Breakthrough Changes for Productivity and 
Profit. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 
AN EFFECTIVE PROCESS MODELLING TECHNIQUE
303