DIALOGICAL INTERACTIONS CONCERNING THE SCIENTIFIC CONTENT USING THE PLANNING TOOL, THE ARGUMENTATION TOOL AND FACE TO FACE COMMUNICATION

Z. Smyrnaiou, E. Varypati, E. Tsouma

2012

Abstract

This study is devoted to the qualitative analysis of dialogues conducted between students in a modern learning platform in which students learn how to learn together, argue and construct plans to resolve problems concerning scientific matters. The challenge-based scenario used in this research is related to the “Shots”. We are interested in the way students interact when using two types of pedagogical tools (Planning Tool, Argumentation Tool) in the Metafora Platform, as well as through Face to Face Communication. Results of analysis demonstrate that verbal communication has a coherent structure, when groups try to resolve the common challenge through the Argumentation Tool.

References

  1. De Jong, T., 2006. "Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning." Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research: 107-128.
  2. De Jong, T., 2006. "Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning." Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research: 107-128.
  3. Grandy, and Duschl, R., 2007. Role of inquiry in school science, Science & Education.
  4. Grandy, and Duschl, R., 2007. Role of inquiry in school science, Science & Education.
  5. Hakkarainen, K., 2010. "Learning Communities in the Classroom." International Handbook of Psychology in Education: 177.
  6. Hakkarainen, K., 2010. "Learning Communities in the Classroom." International Handbook of Psychology in Education: 177.
  7. Kynigos, C., 2007. 'Half-Baked Logo Microworlds as Boundary Objects in Integrated Design', Informatics in Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 335-359.
  8. Kynigos, C., 2007. 'Half-Baked Logo Microworlds as Boundary Objects in Integrated Design', Informatics in Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 335-359.
  9. Kynigos, C., Smyrnaiou, Z. & Roussou, M., 2010. Exploring the generation of meanings in mathematics and science with collaborative full-body games. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children , Barcelona, Spain, pp. 222-225.
  10. Kynigos, C., Smyrnaiou, Z. & Roussou, M., 2010. Exploring the generation of meanings in mathematics and science with collaborative full-body games. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children , Barcelona, Spain, pp. 222-225.
  11. Kyza, E. A., & Edelson, D. C., 2003. Reflective inquiry: What it is and how can software scaffolds help. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Chicago, IL.
  12. Kyza, E. A., & Edelson, D. C., 2003. Reflective inquiry: What it is and how can software scaffolds help. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Chicago, IL.
  13. Llewelyn, D., 2002. Inquire Within (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press).
  14. Llewelyn, D., 2002. Inquire Within (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press).
  15. Psillos, D., Niedderer, H., 2002. Teaching and learning in the science laboratory: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  16. Psillos, D., Niedderer, H., 2002. Teaching and learning in the science laboratory: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  17. Schwartz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J., 1999. Toward the development of flexibility adaptive instructional design. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 183- 214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  18. Schwartz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J., 1999. Toward the development of flexibility adaptive instructional design. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 183- 214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  19. Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., Mulholland, P. (in press). How technology resources can be used to represent personal inquiry and support students' understanding of it across contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2729.2011.00414.x
  20. Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., Mulholland, P. (in press). How technology resources can be used to represent personal inquiry and support students' understanding of it across contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2729.2011.00414.x
  21. Scheur, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N. & Mclaren, B. M., 2010. Computer-Supported Argumentation: A Review of the State of the Art. International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning. 5(1).
  22. Scheur, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N. & Mclaren, B. M., 2010. Computer-Supported Argumentation: A Review of the State of the Art. International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning. 5(1).
  23. Shimoda, T. A., White, B. Y. Frederiksen J. R., 2002. Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors. Science Education, 86 (2), 244 - 263.
  24. Shimoda, T. A., White, B. Y. Frederiksen J. R., 2002. Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors. Science Education, 86 (2), 244 - 263.
  25. Smyrnaiou Z. & Dimitracopoulou A., 2007. ?nquiry learning using a technology-based learning environment. In (Ed) C. Constantinou & Z. Zacharia, Computer Based Learning in Sciences, Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Computer Based Learning (CBLIS), 31 June-6 July, Heraklion, Crete, pp. 90-100.
  26. Smyrnaiou Z. & Dimitracopoulou A., 2007. ?nquiry learning using a technology-based learning environment. In (Ed) C. Constantinou & Z. Zacharia, Computer Based Learning in Sciences, Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Computer Based Learning (CBLIS), 31 June-6 July, Heraklion, Crete, pp. 90-100.
  27. Smyrnaiou, Z. & Weil-Barais, A., 2005. Évaluation cognitive d'un logiciel de modélisation auprès d'élèves de collège, Didaskalia, nº 27, Décembre, pp. 133-149.
  28. Smyrnaiou, Z. & Weil-Barais, A., 2005. Évaluation cognitive d'un logiciel de modélisation auprès d'élèves de collège, Didaskalia, nº 27, Décembre, pp. 133-149.
  29. Viennot, L., 1996. Raisonner en physique (la part du sens commun) . Paris, Bruxelles, De Boeck Université.
  30. Viennot, L., 1996. Raisonner en physique (la part du sens commun) . Paris, Bruxelles, De Boeck Université.
  31. Wegerif, R. & Yang, Y., 2011. “Visual Language for Learning Processes”, Metafora Deliverable D2.1.
  32. Wegerif, R. & Yang, Y., 2011. “Visual Language for Learning Processes”, Metafora Deliverable D2.1.
  33. Zacharia, Z. and Anderson, O. R., 2003. The effects of an interactive computer-based simulations prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiments on students' conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics 71: 618-629.
  34. Zacharia, Z. and Anderson, O. R., 2003. The effects of an interactive computer-based simulations prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiments on students' conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics 71: 618-629.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Smyrnaiou Z., Varypati E. and Tsouma E. (2012). DIALOGICAL INTERACTIONS CONCERNING THE SCIENTIFIC CONTENT USING THE PLANNING TOOL, THE ARGUMENTATION TOOL AND FACE TO FACE COMMUNICATION . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-8565-06-8, pages 323-326. DOI: 10.5220/0003917503230326


in Harvard Style

Smyrnaiou Z., Varypati E. and Tsouma E. (2012). DIALOGICAL INTERACTIONS CONCERNING THE SCIENTIFIC CONTENT USING THE PLANNING TOOL, THE ARGUMENTATION TOOL AND FACE TO FACE COMMUNICATION . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-8565-06-8, pages 323-326. DOI: 10.5220/0003917503230326


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu12,
author={Z. Smyrnaiou and E. Varypati and E. Tsouma},
title={DIALOGICAL INTERACTIONS CONCERNING THE SCIENTIFIC CONTENT USING THE PLANNING TOOL, THE ARGUMENTATION TOOL AND FACE TO FACE COMMUNICATION},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2012},
pages={323-326},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003917503230326},
isbn={978-989-8565-06-8},
}


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu12,
author={Z. Smyrnaiou and E. Varypati and E. Tsouma},
title={DIALOGICAL INTERACTIONS CONCERNING THE SCIENTIFIC CONTENT USING THE PLANNING TOOL, THE ARGUMENTATION TOOL AND FACE TO FACE COMMUNICATION},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2012},
pages={323-326},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003917503230326},
isbn={978-989-8565-06-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - DIALOGICAL INTERACTIONS CONCERNING THE SCIENTIFIC CONTENT USING THE PLANNING TOOL, THE ARGUMENTATION TOOL AND FACE TO FACE COMMUNICATION
SN - 978-989-8565-06-8
AU - Smyrnaiou Z.
AU - Varypati E.
AU - Tsouma E.
PY - 2012
SP - 323
EP - 326
DO - 10.5220/0003917503230326


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - DIALOGICAL INTERACTIONS CONCERNING THE SCIENTIFIC CONTENT USING THE PLANNING TOOL, THE ARGUMENTATION TOOL AND FACE TO FACE COMMUNICATION
SN - 978-989-8565-06-8
AU - Smyrnaiou Z.
AU - Varypati E.
AU - Tsouma E.
PY - 2012
SP - 323
EP - 326
DO - 10.5220/0003917503230326