HOW MANY STEPS - DO THEY COUNT?
Experiments on Pedometer Use
Eija Koskivaara
1
, Leena Haanpää
2
, Harri Helajärvi
3
, Raija Laukkanen
4
and Olli J. Heinonen
3
1
Information Systems Science, University of Turku, 200014, Turku, Finland
2
Turku Institute for Child and Youth Research, University of Turku, 200014, Turku, Finland
3
Paavo Nurmi Centre and Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Turku, 200014, Turku, Finland
4
Polar Electro Oy, Professorintie 5, FIN-90440 Kempele and Department of Health Science,
University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Keywords: Physical Activity, Pedometer, End-user Experience.
Abstract: Physical inactivity is the fourth highest risk for mortality globally. One of the main drivers for physical
activity (PA) in the future could be information and communication technology (ICT) gadgets and services
that support active way of living. This paper focuses on how pedometer use supports PA and the end-user
experience of the device. 26 subjects took part in a five-month study. Data was collected with a semi-
structured questionnaire from individuals using pedometers and reporting their daily steps. The participants
increased their PA during the project and most of them wanted to continue with the more active lifestyle.
1 INTRODUCTION
Technology, urbanization, increasingly sedentary
work environments and automobile-focused
community design have significantly reduced daily
physical activity (PA). Obesity, type II diabetes,
cardiovascular diseases and sedentary way of living
are rapidly increasing epidemics in the western
world. They challenge the health and well-being of
modern society. Sedentary and unfit way of living
increases numerous chronic diseases and decreases
longevity (Blair and Haskell 2006). Physical
inactivity is globally the fourth highest risk for
mortality (WHO 2009). PA is known to improve
health and is extremely effective in preventing and
treating lifestyle related diseases at all ages (The
Toronto Charter for Physical Activity 2010).
PA has been promoted by recommendations
which vary from country to country. The
recommendations for youth, adults and older adults
in the USA are probably the best known (PA USA
2008). The Finnish recommendations for PA are in
line with these. For substantial health benefits, adults
should accumulate at least two and a half hours of
moderate-intensity exercise, or one hour and fifteen
minutes vigorous PA, weekly. One bout of aerobic
PA should last at least 10-15 minutes, and the
activity should be spread throughout the week.
Adults should also do muscle-strengthening
activities (8 to 10 exercises with 8 to 12 repetitions
of each) twice a week.
The Toronto meeting for PA addressed
technology as one of the reasons for sedentary
behaviour. However, ICT applications have
expanded from automating to accompanying,
entertaining and fantasizing ones (Iivari 2007),
activity monitors and sport games as examples. This
paper focuses on how pedometer use supports PA,
and what the end-user experience of the device is.
2 ICT ADAPTION AND
PEDOMETER FOR PA
Technology acceptance and the intention to use
information systems have been widely studied since
the technology acceptance model (TAM) was
published (Davis 1989). Usefulness and ease of use
are key factors in technology acceptance. User
acceptance of IT has been thoroughly studied in
UTAUT-model (Unified Theory of Acceptance and
Use of Technology) (Venkatesh et al. 2003).
Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social
influence, and facilitating conditions are direct
determinants of usage intention and behaviour.
Gender, age, experience, and voluntariness of use
589
Koskivaara E., Haanpää L., Helajärjvi H., Laukkanen R. and Heinonen O..
HOW MANY STEPS - DO THEY COUNT? - Experiments on Pedometer Use.
DOI: 10.5220/0003928605890592
In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST-2012), pages 589-592
ISBN: 978-989-8565-08-2
Copyright
c
2012 SCITEPRESS (Science and Technology Publications, Lda.)
moderate the impact of the four key constructs on
usage intention and behaviour (Venkatesh et al.
2003). DeLone and McLean (1992) argue that an
information system is not successful, if it is not used
by its intended users. Indeed, there is a need for
more parsimony in TAM models and meta-analysis
(Burton-Jones and Straub 2007).
Traditional research of the individual use of IT
applications has taken place at work (e.g. Davis
1989; DeLone and McLean 1992; Venkatesh et al.
2003; Burton-Jones and Straub 2006). However, IT
applications are increasingly used outside of work.
This is true especially with the ICT services and
gadgets for PA. Their determinants of use may be
different from those supporting work or business
processes. If an application or service is not used to
support business activity, measures such as
perceived usefulness (Davis 1989) and performance
expectancy (Venkatesh et al. 2003) may not be
directly applicable. As knowing, identifying,
contacting, sampling, involving and representing
users is becoming more complicated, it is vital to
understand them thoroughly when developing new
IT applications and services (Iivari et al. 2010).
PA promoters and PA related ICT gadget and
service developers face a challenge as end-users
have become more heterogeneous, complex and
diverse. The same service or gadgets may be used by
an IT professional, an average middle-aged
layperson, a teenager nerd, or a granny. How to
make their adaption and use attractive in the PA
domain?
A pedometer is a usually portable and electronic
or electromechanical step counting device. It counts
each step by movement detection. More advanced
pedometers can also estimate e.g. walking distance
and burned daily calories. Hatano (1993) was the
first person to introduce technology into PA in the
format of a portable motion sensor (pedometers).
The device was commercialized in Japan in 1965
under the name of mampo-kei (ten-thousand-step
meter). The target of 10,000 daily steps is today
universally accepted, although more detailed daily
steps activity levels have also been identified (e.g.
Tudor-Locke and Bassett 2004). Pedometers have
been used to evaluate the daily activity (e.g.
Hirvensalo et al. 2010). The advantage of pedometer
is their low cost and easy use. Pedometers can
motivate subjects willing to increase PA. The
general goal of 10,000 daily steps has often been
used for target settings. Tudor-Locke and Bassett
(2004) classified the number of daily steps for PA as
follows:
< 5,000: physical inactivity
5,000-7,499; normal daily activity
7,500-9,999; somewhat physically active
10,000-12,000: physically active way of
living
>12,500: physically highly active.
The daily steps for older adults (50–94 years) range
from 2,000–9,000 (Tudor-Locke et al. 2009). Males
generally take more steps than females. Based on
these results a concept of age-related
recommendation for daily steps has been proposed.
The daily steps taken by Finnish adults aged 30-
45 years vary between 4,800-10,300. In contrast to
the Americans, Finnish females took more steps than
males. Finns reportedly take fewer steps daily than
other Europeans (Hirvensalo et al. 2010). This may
be due to seasonal variation of data collection or
other methodological reasons.
Most studies have focused on determining daily
steps in relation to different disease risk factors, or
diseases. More experience is needed with ICT
gadget use in working-aged population. This 5-
month study seeks further evidence on the role of
pedometers in increasing PA. It also collects user-
experience for the device.
3 RESEARCH DESIGN
Subjects were recruited at two sports clubs with an
open e-mail invitation in October 2010. The
participation was offered to all club members.
Altogether 36 persons registered for this study.
Initially, the subjects were trained to use the
pedometer and the sheet used to report the daily
steps. The subjects reported their daily mean, weekly
mean, and weekend mean steps. In addition, change
of weekly total steps as well as monthly mean,
maximal daily steps and the cumulative number of
steps were collected. High intensity sports and
muscle-training were also reported. During the
study, the subjects received three motivational e-
mails to support their PA.
The data collection lasted 5 months (22 weeks)
from November to April. Also a semi-structured,
self-reporting questionnaire on pedometer use was
used. The questionnaire was designed by a team of
experts in PA, sports and exercise medicine, and
information systems. At the end of the study subjects
received a link to a web-based questionnaire by e-
mail.
4 RESULTS
Twenty-six (26) subjects replied to the web-
WEBIST2012-8thInternationalConferenceonWebInformationSystemsandTechnologies
590
questionnaire and 24 subjects returned the step
sheet. Twenty (20) of the subjects were females and
six (6) males. Five (5) were born in the late 40’s or
50’s (aged 59-72 years), 12 were born in the 60’s
(aged 40-50 years), four (4) in the 70’s (aged 30-40
years) and four (4) in the 90’s (10-20 years). On
average the subjects reported their step data for a
period of 21 weeks (median 19 weeks, range 6-22
weeks). The subjects were experienced pedometer
users, the mean experience being 3.5 years (range 5
months to 10 years and 6 months). Eighteen (18) had
their own pedometers and eight (8) had a borrowed
one. All 26 subjects considered the use of pedometer
easy.
Seventeen (17) used computers to fill in the step
sheet, and 6 did it manually. Seven (7) filled the
sheet daily, 12 did it once a week. Twelve (12) used
their own computer and four used a work-site
computer.
The motives (mean) for taking part in the study
were as follows (scores: 1 = strongly agree, 2 =
agree, 3 = not agree/not disagree, 4 = disagree, 5 =
strongly disagree) *:
1. I wanted to know the number of my daily steps
(2.1).
2. I wanted to become physically more fit for the
summer (2.4).
3. I want to lose some body weight (2.6).
The project increased the subjects PA (Tables 1
and 2).
Table 1: Reported moderate-intensity PA before and
during the study.
PA (30 min moderate-intensity) before during
PA < once a month 2 1
once a month <PA< once a week 5 3
1-2 times weekly 12 5
3-4 times weekly 6 11
5 or more times weekly 1 6
Table 2: Reported vigorous PA before and during the
study.
PA (20 min vigorous) before during
PA < once a month 5 2
once a month <PA<once a week 5 3
1-2 times weekly 10 5
3-4 times weekly 4 11
5 or more times weekly 1 1
The participants followed mainly the daily steps
as well as the total weekly steps and the change. The
participants reported that the project affected the
most the following*:
1. I am physically more active (2.1).
2. The study has activated me (2.5).
3. I am physically more fit (2.7).
The use of pedometer was classified as follows*:
1. The pedometer was easy to use (1.3).
2. The use of pedometer did not require any
special effort (1.4).
3. The pedometer was useful (2.0).
The use of the step table was classified as follows*:
1. The use of the step-table did not require any
special effort (1.6).
2. The step-table was easy to use (1.2).
3. The step-table was useful (2.4).
The reported step numbers are reported in Table 3.
Table 3: Steps taken during the 22-week project.
Step category Mean Median Range
Mon-Fri 7929 7540 5248-17195
Sat-Sun 7887 7788 4624-17867
Nov 7217 7135 4480-18140
Dec 6712 6331 3966-14249
Jan 7957 7179 3425-19729
Feb 7427 6924 3245-15335
March 7617 7407 4136-18712
Daily mean 8030 7781 5424-17382
Daily median 7395 6958 4495-17046
Daily max 21227 19518 9888-58825
Table 4 illustrates the previous user experience
for different ICT gadgets and services. Altogether 75
% of the subjects reported experience with more
than one device or service. The majority were
unsatisfied with ICT gadgets that had not worked
well or were complicated to use. The gadgets that
had been received as a gift were often not used.
Table 4: User experience of previous PA related ICT
gadgets or services.
ICT gadget / service # of subjects
pedometer 17
heart rate monitor 11
mp3 player / radio 8
PA websites 3
sport videos / TV 3
gaming consoles 2
Table 5 illustrates from where subjects would
prefer to get feedback for their PA. Health care and
sports/PA professionals, and family members and
friends were preferred.
HOWMANYSTEPS-DOTHEYCOUNT?-ExperimentsonPedometerUse
591
Table 5: Favourite feedback providers.
Feedback provider # of subjects
sports / PA instructors
11
health care professionals
7
family member
6
friends
5
sports clubs
4
personal trainer
3
employer
1
The majority wished for personal feedback (15
subjects). Nine (9) would like to receive feedback
via e-mail and three (3) with a text-message.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Twenty-six individuals completed this 5-month
pedometer study. The subjects reported an increase
in their PA during the study (especially females).
Most reported also an intention to continue with a
more active lifestyle in the future.
The step trend during the study was pretty stable.
Based on the median number of steps the subjects
were normal physically active.
The participants felt that the pedometer was easy
to use and useful in supporting PA. Most of the
subjects had experience of more than one PA related
ICT device or service, and they had been unsatisfied
with ICT gadgets that had not worked well or had
been complicated to use. The gadgets that had been
received as a gift were not used.
Professionals, and friends and family were
considered the most important sources of feedback
and support.
Based on this study, ICT gadgets that are easy to
use and that can be combined together with social
and professional support, provide the best positive
impact on PA performed by individuals. PA increase
is important for an individual, but also for overall
public health. New, innovative approaches and tools
to reshape our inactive lifestyle are needed.
We propose development of individually tailored
PA programs, and advising and monitoring
according to mass-customisation models for public
health and PA promoters. Studies of the importance
of family and friends in ICT gadget and service
adaption for PA should be considered. Use and
development of social media to support positive
attitude with reliable information to health and PA
should also be evaluated.
REFERENCES
Blair S. and Haskell W. (2006). Objectively measured
physical activity and mortality in older adults, The
Journal of American Medical Association, 296, 216-
218.
Burton-Jones, A. and Straub D. W. (2006)
Reconceptualising system usage: An approach and
empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17, 3,
228-246.
Burton-Jones, A. and Straub D. W. (2007), Veni, Vidi,
Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam. Journal of the
Association of Information Systems. 8, 4, 223-229.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived ease of use, and user
acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly,
13, 319–340.
DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (1992). Information
systems success: the quest for the dependent variable.
Information Systems Research, 3, 60–95.
Hatano Y. (1993). Use of the pedometer for promoting
daily walking exercise. ICHPER-SD J. 29:4–8.
Hirvensalo M., Telama R., Tammelin T., Yang X., Viikari
J., Raitakari O. (2010) Finnish women take more daily
steps than Finnish men, (in Finnish). Liikunta ja Tiede,
2010, Vol. 47, No. 4, p. 18–21.
Iivari, J. (2007) Paradigmatic analysis of information
systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of
Information Systems, 19, 39–63.
Iivari, J. Isomäki, H and Pekkola, S. (2010). The user – the
great unknown of systems development: reasons,
forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual
contributions of user involvement (editorial) Info
Systems J, 20, 109–117.
Schutz Y and Chambaz A (1997) Could a satellite-based
navigation system (GPS) be used to assess the
physical activity of individuals on earth? European
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 51, No 5, 338-339.
The Toronto Charter for Physical Activity (2010). Global
Call for Action, www.globalpa.org.uk, final version
May 2010.
Tudor-Locke C. and Bassett Jr D. R. (2004). How Many
Steps/Day Are Enough?: Preliminary Pedometer
Indices for Public Health. Sport Medicine, Vol. 34,
No. 1, pp. 1–8.
Tudor-Locke C., Hart T. L., Washington T. L. (2009)
Expected values for pedometer-determined physical
activity in older populations. International Journal of
Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2009, Vol.
6, Nr. 59, p.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D.
(2003). User acceptance of information technology:
toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
WHO (2009). Global Health Risks: Mortality and burden
of disease attributable to selected major risks, WHO
Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. WHO
Press.
WEBIST2012-8thInternationalConferenceonWebInformationSystemsandTechnologies
592