Perceptual Comparison of Demosaicing Algorithms and In-camera Demosaicing with JPEG Compression

Bartolomeo Montrucchio

2013

Abstract

Color image acquisition in digital cameras is often performed by using CCD or CMOS sensor chips with a color filter array on the top of a single monochromatic sensor. In this paper, a perceptual comparison is performed among three well known demosaicing algorithms plus in-camera demosaicing with lossy compression JPEG, by means of subjective tests, that is with the help of human beings. The novelty of the approach is that chosen algorithms have been selected as representative of those used in commercial raw image converters used by professionals in graphics and that the test has been performed on a large number of people, achieving results only partially similar to the results got by means of computed metrics. The results show that in the greatest part of conditions and for non particularly expert users, the capability of the most advanced demosaicing algorithms of producing an almost perfect reconstruction on the full-color image is not strictly required. Only for selected categories of images it is possible to find a clear winner among the algorithms.

References

  1. Chang, E., Cheung, S., and Pan, D. Y. (1999). Color filter array recovery using a threshold-based variable number of gradients. In Proc. SPIE, volume 3650, pages 36-43.
  2. Coffin, D. J. (2011). Dcraw, decoding raw digital photos in linux. http://www.cybercom.net/˜dcoffin/dcraw/.
  3. Gunturk, B., Glotzbach, J., Altunbasak, Y., Schafer, R., and Mersereau, R. (2005). Demosaicking: color filter array interpolation. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 22(1):44 - 54.
  4. Hao, P., Li, Y., Lin, Z., and Dubois, E. (2011). A geometric method for optimal design of color filter arrays. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 20(3):709 -722.
  5. Hirakawa, K. and Parks, T. (2005). Adaptive homogeneitydirected demosaicing algorithm. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 14(3):360 -369.
  6. Li, X., Gunturk, B., and Zhang, L. (2008). Image demosaicing: a systematic survey. In Proc. SPIE, volume 6822.
  7. Longere, P., Zhang, X., Delahunt, P., and Brainard, D. (2002). Perceptual assessment of demosaicing algorithm performance. Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(1):123 -132.
  8. Rajeev Ramanath, A., Snyder, B., and Hinks, C. (2002). Image comparison measure for digital still color cameras. In Image Processing. 2002. Proceedings. 2002 International Conference on, volume 1, pages I-629 - I-632 vol.1.
  9. Sakamoto, T., Nakanishi, C., and Hase, T. (1998). Software pixel interpolation for digital still cameras suitable for a 32-bit mcu. Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, 44(4):1342-1352.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Montrucchio B. (2013). Perceptual Comparison of Demosaicing Algorithms and In-camera Demosaicing with JPEG Compression . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications - Volume 1: VISAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2013) ISBN 978-989-8565-47-1, pages 130-133. DOI: 10.5220/0004297801300133


in Bibtex Style

@conference{visapp13,
author={Bartolomeo Montrucchio},
title={Perceptual Comparison of Demosaicing Algorithms and In-camera Demosaicing with JPEG Compression},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications - Volume 1: VISAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2013)},
year={2013},
pages={130-133},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004297801300133},
isbn={978-989-8565-47-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications - Volume 1: VISAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2013)
TI - Perceptual Comparison of Demosaicing Algorithms and In-camera Demosaicing with JPEG Compression
SN - 978-989-8565-47-1
AU - Montrucchio B.
PY - 2013
SP - 130
EP - 133
DO - 10.5220/0004297801300133