Designing a General Architecture for Data Interchange

Alina Andreica, Josef Küng, Gabriela Şerban Czibulla, Christian Sacarea

2014

Abstract

The paper describes principles for designing a general framework for automatic data interchange that scopes all three levels, data, semantic and knowledge. In spite of the huge amount of research already performed and existing standards and products, there is room to enhance information and knowledge integration. Consequent to defining the data interchange framework, we are going to apply these principles in developing and implementing a solution for academic data interchange. Such a solution has the potentiality for important advantages in academic cooperation and societal benefits.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V., 1995. Foundations of Databases, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  2. Abiteboul, S., Buneman, P., Suciu, D., 2000. Data on the Web: From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  3. Adams, S.; Hardas, D.; Iossein, A. and Kaiman, C., 2002. BizTalk Unleashed. Indianapolis, Indiana: Sams Publishing. p. 966.
  4. Agrawal, R., Psaila, G., 1995. Active Data Mining, KDD 1995, p. 3-8.
  5. Aggarwal, R; Charu C.; Wang, H. (Eds.), 2010. Managing and Mining Graph Data, Advances in Database Systems 40, Springer.
  6. AICC - CMI Guidelines for Interoperability AICC http://aicc.org/docs/tech/cmi001v4.pdf, Acc Dec 2012.
  7. Algergawy, A., Mesiti, M., Nayak, R.; Saake, G., 2011. XML data clustering: An overview, ACM Comput. Surv. 43(4), p. 25.
  8. Algergawy, A., Nayak, R; Saake, G, 2010. Element similarity measures in XML schema matching. Inf. Sci. 180(24), p. 4975-4998.
  9. Andreica, A-B; Stuparu, D; Mantu, I, 2005. Symbolic Modelling of Database Representations, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing SYNASC 2005, P.59 - 62.
  10. Aroyo, L., Dolog, P., Houben, G-J., Kravcik, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Wild, F., 2006, Interoperability in Personalized Adaptive Learning, Educational Technology & Society, 9 (2), 4-18.
  11. AS2 -MIME-based Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange Using HTTP, Applicability Statement 2 (AS2), RFC 4130, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4130 , Accessed December 2013.
  12. AS4 - AS4: Web Services for B2B, GS1 eTG White Paper, 2011 http://www.gs1.org/docs/ecom/AS4_- _A_new_tools_for_the_B2B_toolbox.pdf.
  13. Bourret, R. P., 2000. XML Database Products, http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/ , acc November 2011.
  14. CC-IMS - “Common Cartridges Frequently Asked Questions”, IMS Global Learning Consortium, http://www.imsglobal.org/cc/ccfaqs.html#3, Dec 2012.
  15. Chapman, C, Kihn, L-A., 2009. Information system integration, enabling control and performance, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Volume 34, Issue 2, P. 151-169.
  16. Chen, J Y; Lonardi, S (Eds), 2009. Biological Data Mining, Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1st edition.
  17. Dang, T. K., Küng, J., Van Quoc, P. H., 2011. Protecting Privacy While Discovering and Maintaining Association Rules,Conference: New Technologies, Mobility and Security - NTMS, IEEE, p 1-5.
  18. Dicheva, D., Sosnovsky, S., Gavrilova, T., Brusilovsky, P., 2005. Ontological Web Portal for Educational Ontologies, Proc. of the Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for e-Learning.
  19. Di Nitto, E., Mainetti, L., Monga, M., Sbatella, L., Tedesco, R., 2006. Supporting Interoperability and Reusability of Learning Objects: The Virtual Campus Approach, Educational Tech. & Society, 9 (2), 33-50.
  20. FIPA - The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, www.fipa.org , Accessed December 2012.
  21. Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R., 2005. Formal Concept Analysis - Foundations and Applications, Springer.
  22. Gibb, B. K., Damodaran, S., 2002. ebXML: Concepts and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
  23. Gruber, T. R. 1993, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, volume 5, pp. 199-220.
  24. Han, J., Kamber, M., 2006. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  25. Han, J.; Gao, J., 2009. Research Challenges for Data Mining in Science and Engineering, H. Kargupta et al., (eds.), Next Generation of Data Mining, Chapman & Hall, 3-28.
  26. Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J., 2011. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd edition, Morgan Kaufmann.
  27. Hasselbring, W., 2000. ”Information System Integration”, Communications of the ACM, 43 (6). pp. 32-36.
  28. Hasselbring, W., Pedersen, S., 2005. “Metamodelling of Domain-Specific Standards for Semantic Interoperability”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3782, pp. 557 - 559.
  29. Heflin, J., Hendler, J., 2000. Semantic Interoperability on the Web http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/ pubs/extreme2000.pdf.
  30. Heflin, J., Stuckenschmidt, H., 2012, Web-scale semantic information processing,. J. Web Sem. 10, p. 1-2.
  31. Heise, A., Naumann, F., 2012. Integrating open government data with stratosphere for more transparency, J. Web Sem. 14, p. 45-56.
  32. Hitzler, Pascal, Schärfe, Henrik, 2009, Conceptual Structures in Practice, Taylor and Francis Group.
  33. HIS-Building A Roadmap for Health Information Systems Interoperability for Public Health, 2007. Dec.2012 http://www.ihe.net/technical_framework/upload/ihe_p hdsc_public_health_white_paper_2007_10_11.pdf.
  34. Hong, Tzung-Pei; Chen, Chun-Hao; Tseng, Vincent S., 2010, A Summary of Genetic-Fuzzy Data Mining Techniques, GrC 2010, pp. 28-29.
  35. IHE - Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, www.ihe.net, Accessed December 2012.
  36. IMS CC - IMS Common Cartridge http://www.imsglobal.org/cc/, Access December 2012.
  37. Jain, Anil K., 2010, Data clustering: 50 years beyond Kmeans. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 31, 8 (June 2010), pp. 651-666. DOI=10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011.
  38. Karnstedt, M., Sattler, K-U, Hauswirth M., 2012. Scalable distributed indexing and query processing over Linked Data, J. Web Sem. 10, p. 3-32.
  39. Kassahun, A., Beulens, A., Hartog, R., 2006. Providing Author-Defined State Data Storage to Learning Objects, Educational Tech. & Society, 9(2), 19-32.
  40. Kohonen, T., Schroeder, M. R. and Huang, T. S. (Eds.) , 2001. Self-Organizing Maps (3rd ed.). SpringerVerlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA.
  41. Lassila, O., Swick, R., 1999. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, W3C (World-Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax19990222 , Accessed December 2013.
  42. Le, D. X., Rahayu, J. W., and Pardede, E., 2006. Dynamic approach for integrating web data warehouses. In Proc. of International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA). 207-216.
  43. LTI-IMS - “Learning Tools Interoperability”. IMS Global Learning Consortium , Accessed December 2012 http://www.imsglobal.org/toolsinteroperability2.cfm ,
  44. Manolescu, I., Florescu, D., Kossmann, D., 2001. Answering XML Queries on Heterogeneous, VLDB 7801 Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 241-250.
  45. Mitchell, Tom, 1997. Machine Learning, McGraw Hill.
  46. Morris, E., Levine, L., Meyers, C., Place, P., Plakosh, D., 2004. System of Systems Interoperability (SOSI): Final Report, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2004- TR-004, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/04tr004.pdf.
  47. Nwana, H.S., 1996. Software Agents: An Overview. Knowledge Engineering Review.
  48. OASIS - OASIS ebXML Messaging Services Version 3.0: Part 1, Core Features, 2007. http://docs.oasisopen.org/ebxml-msg/ebms/v3.0/core/ebms_core-3.0- spec.pdf , Accessed December 2012.
  49. Open - The Open Group, Accessed December 2012 http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/si.
  50. OpenIoT - Open Internet of Things architecture https://github.com/OpenIotOrg/openiot/wiki/OpenIoTArchitecture , Accessed December 2013.
  51. PESC-CEDS, PESC Common Education Data Standards http://www.pesc.org/interior.php?page_id=208 Accessed December 2012.
  52. Rosetta - Rosettanet Overview: Clusters, Segments, and PIPs (ver 02.13.00), 2011 http://www.rosettanet.org/ TheStandards/RosettaNetStandards/PIPOverview/tabi d/3482/Default.aspx.
  53. Sattler, K., Geist, I., Schallehn, E., 2005. Concept-based Querying in Mediator Systems. VLDB Journal, 14(1), 97-111.
  54. SCORM - Shared Content Object Reference Model http://scorm.com/ , Accesed December 2012.
  55. Shen, W., Norrie, D.H., Barthes, J. A., 2001, Multi-Agent System for Concurrent Intelligent Design and Manufacturing, Taylor & Francis.
  56. SIF Specifications, http://www.sifinfo.org/us/sifspecification.asp, Accessed December 2012.
  57. Sutton, R S., Barto, A G, 1998. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, A Bradford Book. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  58. Stumme, G., Wille, R., 2000. Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung / Conceptual Knowledge Processing, Springer Verlag.
  59. Serban, G., Czibula, I. G., Câmpan, A., 2008. Medical Diagnosis Prediction using Relational Association Rules, International Conference on Theory and Applications of Mathematics and Informatics (ICTAMI'07), Alba-Iulia, pp. 339-352.
  60. UDEF - Universal Data Element Framework, http://www.opengroup.org/udef/, Acc December 2013.
  61. Vouros, G. A., Papasalouros, A.; Tzonas, K., Valarakos, A G., Kotis, K., Quiané-Ruiz, J-A.; Lamarre, P., Valduriez, P., 2010. A semantic information system for services and traded resources in Grid e-markets, Future Generation Comp. Syst. 26(7), p. 916-933.
  62. Walker: E., 2012. Primer on K-20 Education Interoperability Standards, Publication of the Software & Information Industry Association.
  63. Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, Mark A., 2011. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (3 ed.), Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-12-374856-0.
  64. Weiss, G. E., 1999. Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press.
  65. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R., Kinny, D., 2000. The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3, pp. 285-312.
  66. XML standard, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#charsets , accessed November 2012.
  67. Yuan, L., Wilson, S., Cooper, A., Campbell, L. M., 2010. The Future of Interoperability and Standards in Education - System and Process, CETIS White paper.
  68. Ziemann, Jörg, 2010. Architecture of Interoperable Information Systems - An Enterprise Model-Based for Describing and Enacting Collaborative Business Processes, Logos Verlag, Berlin.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Andreica A., Küng J., Şerban Czibulla G. and Sacarea C. (2014). Designing a General Architecture for Data Interchange . In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, ISBN 978-989-758-023-9, pages 214-219. DOI: 10.5220/0004964002140219


in Bibtex Style

@conference{webist14,
author={Alina Andreica and Josef Küng and Gabriela Şerban Czibulla and Christian Sacarea},
title={Designing a General Architecture for Data Interchange},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,},
year={2014},
pages={214-219},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004964002140219},
isbn={978-989-758-023-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,
TI - Designing a General Architecture for Data Interchange
SN - 978-989-758-023-9
AU - Andreica A.
AU - Küng J.
AU - Şerban Czibulla G.
AU - Sacarea C.
PY - 2014
SP - 214
EP - 219
DO - 10.5220/0004964002140219