Learning Scenarios' Operationalization - A Process based on Ontology and Patterns

Zeyneb Tadjine, Lahcen Oubahssi, Claudine Toffolon, Sébastien Iksal

2015

Abstract

This article describes our work that aims to support teachers deploying automatically their instructional design, by the mean of patterns. We seek to balance between the need of expressive instructional scenarios, and the technical constraints that occur while deploying those scenarios on learning management systems (LMS). This could be seen as a need of a formal description in order to translate the concepts of a pedagogical scenario, according to those embedded in the LMS. To address this need, we propose a process of structuring formalizing, indexing and finally adapting and operationalizing the instructional scenario. This Process is based on a model of knowledge representation. Different Data levels around the scenario representation as well as the functional essence of educational systems will be presented. We also describe the way this model is structured so that it allows preserving most of the scenarios semantic.

References

  1. Abedmouleh, A., Oubahssi, L., Laforcade, P., and Choquet, C., 2012. An Analysis Process for Identifying and Formalizing LMS Instructional Language. In ICSOFT 218-223.
  2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., 1977. A pattern language, town, buildings, constructions, Oxford University Press.
  3. Amorim, R., Lama, M., Sánchez, E., Riera, A., and Vila, X. A., 2006 A learning design ontology based on the IMS specification. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1) 38-57.
  4. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., 2001 A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition, New York , Longman.
  5. Berggren, A., Burgos, D., Fontana, J.M., Hinkelman, D., Hung, V., and Hursh, A., Tielemans, G., 2005. Practical and Pedagogical Issues for Teacher Adoption of IMS Learning Design Standards in Moodle LMS. In Teacher Adoption of IMS Learning Design Standards in Moodle LMS. Journal of Interactive Media in Education.
  6. Bézivin, J., Lemesle, R., 1998. Ontology-based layered semantics for precise OAandD modeling. In ObjectOriented Technologys (pp. 151-154). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  7. Buendía-García, F., Benlloch-Dualde, J. V., 2011. Using patterns to design technology-enhanced learning scenarios. In eLearning Papers 27 1-12.
  8. Churchill, D., 2007.Towards a useful classification of learning objects.Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5) 479-497.
  9. Clayer, J. P., Piau-Toffolon, C., and Choquet, C, 2014. Assistance for Learning Design Community - A Context-awarenessandPattern-based Approach. CSEDU 293-300.
  10. Dietrich, J., Elgar, C., 2007. An ontology based representation of software design patterns. Design Patterns Formalization Techniques, 258.
  11. Ferraris, C., Martel, C., and Vignollet, L., 2007. LDL for Collaborative Activities. Handbook of Visual Languages in Instructional Design: Theories and Practices. In: Instructional Design: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications 1.
  12. Goodyear, P., Yang, D., 2008 Patterns and pattern languages in educational design. Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies 167-187.
  13. Hernandez-Leo, D., Jorrin-Abellan, I.M., VillasclarasFernandez, E.D., Asensio-Perez, J.I., and Dimitriadis, Y,.2010. A multicase study for the evaluation of a pattern-based visual design process for collaborative learning. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 21: 313-331.
  14. IMS-LD. IMS Learning Design, http://www.imsglobal.org/index.html. Consulté en Janvier (2015).
  15. Katsamani, M., Retalis, S., and Boloudakis, M., 2012. Designing a Moodle course with the CADMOS learning design tool. Educational Media International,49(4) 317-331.
  16. Koper, R., 2001 Modelling Units of Study from a pedagogical perspective: The pedagogical metamodel behind EML. Technical Report OUNL.
  17. Laurillard, D., 2012. Teaching as a Design Science, Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology, edition Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415- 8038.
  18. Loiseau, E., Laforcade, P., and Iksal, S., 2014. Abstraction of Learning Management Systems Instructional Design Semantics: A Meta-modeling Approach Applied to the Moodle Case-Study. In Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities 249- 262. Springer International Publishing.
  19. Neven, F., and Duval, E, 2002. Reusable learning objects: a survey of LOM-based repositories. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia 291-294.
  20. Montenegro, C., Cueva-Lovelle, J-M., Sanjuán-Martínez, O. and Gaona-Garcia, P-A., 2010. Modeling and comparison study of modules in open source lms platforms with cmapstool. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence newsletter.
  21. Oubahssi, L., Piau-Toffolon, C., Clayer, J. P., and Kammoun, F., 2013. Design and Operationalization of Patterns-Case of a Training Situation of Personal Assistance for Public in Professional Integration. In ICSOFT 488-495.
  22. Sakai, 2015. https://www.sakaiproject.org/
  23. Prieto, L. P., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., GómezSánchez, E., and Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., 2011 GLUE!-PS: a multi-language architecture and data model to deploy TEL designs to multiple learning environments. In Towards ubiquitous learning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 285-298.
  24. Paquette, G., 2014. A Competency-Based Ontology for Learning Design Repositories. International Journal.
  25. Pernin, JP., Lejeune, A., 2004. Dispositifs d'apprentissage instrumentés par les technologies : vers une ingénierie centrée sur les scénarios. Technologies de l'Information et de la Connaissance dans l'Enseignement Supérieur et de l'Industrie. Université de Technologie de Compiègne. 407-414.
  26. Rice, W., 2011. Moodle 2.0 E-Learning Course Development. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  27. Villasclaras-Fernández, E., Hernández-Leo, D., AsensioPérez, J. I., and Dimitriadis, Y., 2013. Web Collage: an implementation of support for assessment design in CSCL macro-scripts. Computers and Education, 79- 97.Wang F., Hannafin M.J., 2005. Design-based research and Technology-Enhanced Learning. ETRandD. Vol.53(4) 5-23.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Tadjine Z., Oubahssi L., Toffolon C. and Iksal S. (2015). Learning Scenarios' Operationalization - A Process based on Ontology and Patterns . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-108-3, pages 139-147. DOI: 10.5220/0005493301390147


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu15,
author={Zeyneb Tadjine and Lahcen Oubahssi and Claudine Toffolon and Sébastien Iksal},
title={Learning Scenarios' Operationalization - A Process based on Ontology and Patterns},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2015},
pages={139-147},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005493301390147},
isbn={978-989-758-108-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Learning Scenarios' Operationalization - A Process based on Ontology and Patterns
SN - 978-989-758-108-3
AU - Tadjine Z.
AU - Oubahssi L.
AU - Toffolon C.
AU - Iksal S.
PY - 2015
SP - 139
EP - 147
DO - 10.5220/0005493301390147