Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating
the Surf Zone
Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and in Wave Catching
João Miguel Antunes Brogueira and César José Duarte Peixoto
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
Keywords: Safety, Coastal Currents, Surf, Systematics, Wave Knowledge, Lineup, Patterns.
Abstract: Regarding the beach safety of surf zone users, this study aims to systematize the “Wave Knowledge” of the
most efficient lifeguards, the surfing masters, by classifying the indicators relevant for recognizing spacial
and temporal patterns and risk factors. This is evidenced by the proficiency in motor tasks essential both to
the sport and rescuing in the surf zone: positioning in the lineup, catching waves/ returning to shore (when
“Wave judgement” is needed). We start by reviewing the literature from Surf Sciences, followed by an
analysis of manuals of Surfing as a sport. Then we researched the prospective procedures of experts in
extreme surf conditions and observed behaviour of top surfers in competition, to put up a classification of
the visual signs used (sea and swell, wind, tide, seabed configuration, currents, and details of breaking
waves’ forms). Based on the acquired data, we built a Questionnaire to rank the “relative importance of the
signals”, which surveyed 11 surf national champions/ coaches (male/female practitioners with over 15
years’ experience). Results show that experienced surfers evaluate all elements of the “waves-currents
system”, although the location, type and intensity of maritime currents (except under conditions of small
waves), and the swell characteristics (angle of arrival to coast, height, period) stand out as the most
important. The importance of the signals varies according to the wave height and the wave break types. The
respondents also attend configuration of seabed and coast profile in their evaluation. As for the surf quality,
they consider the characteristics of the coastal wind and temporal characteristics of the tides. For the
strength of the surf and the take-off point, the focus is on sections and wave face profiles (slope, thickness).
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Symposium Technology in Surfing
Paper made for TechSurf, Congress “Sports Science
Research and Technology Support icSPORTS2013”,
21 Sept Portugal. Master thesis presented in
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, 21 July 2011.
May it contribute “For others may live”, motto
that my father flew in FAP. Professor Peixoto made
it possible. Greetings to the expert surfers inquired.
Mother, thank you. Love, beautiful Cecília. To
Joana: love you, dearest daughter, fight for dignity!
Figure 1: Observe, research, systematize, teach, compete.
1.2 Foreword: Unacceptable Mass
Drownings in Surf Bathing
In this study we approached the problem of
safeguarding human life when bathing/ swimming in
our Portuguese sea, from the perspective of the most
efficient lifeguard – the very experienced and
informed surfer, used to big waves, with exceptional
fitness. “[Hawaiian, North Pacific] Surfers made the
best lifeguards because they have experienced first-
hand how powerful the ocean can be. They also
knew the most about its many variables, including
waves, wind conditions, currents, rip tides, channels
and shore breaks”; “people who understand the
ocean and are not afraid of it” (Coleman, 2001). In
Oceanic coastline, where all environment elements
are commonly present with uncontrollable forces
(and occasionally brutal, by conjunction of variables
that to the layman tourist look ordinary), these wave
runners possess a practical knowledge about the
Ocean’s wave-currents dynamics in the wave
104
Brogueira, J. and Peixoto, C..
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and in Wave Catching.
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support (icSPORTS 2015), pages 104-118
ISBN: 978-989-758-159-5
Copyright
c
2015 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
breaking coastal zones (“surf zones”), which is
fundamental in Beach Safety and in Sea Rescue. In
Portugal [North Atlantic] the “surfer lifeguard”
brought new knowledge and practices that were
applied from 1973 in “new methods and equipment”
in rescue practices. This resulted in no more
drownings in beaches where it was frequent. “The
choice of lifeguards surfers is an added value to any
beach on the Atlantic coast”, “a sea with strength
and currents, unpredictable and where we find
changes in the currents, the size and strength of the
waves in just a few hours” (Rocha, 2008).
These experienced sporting watermen,
“extremely proficient ocean swimmer and surfer
[…] who can make informed decisions and
predetermine the level of risk they will face”
(Guisado, 2003), “know how to identify, to
anticipate and to explain the risks” (Coleman, 2001),
are the most capable and competent rescuers (Surf
Life Saving Association of Australia, 1975). In these
conditions, the understanding of the phenomena, a
good knowledge of surf conditions, is vitally
important to all surfers (Orbelian, 1982) (Somers,
1988) (Lowdon, 1988) (Noll and Gabbard, 1989)
(SLSAA, 1974) (Collins, 1992) (Dupouey, 1997)
(Jenkins, 1993) (Butt, 2002) (Colburn et al, 2002)
(Slater & Borte, 2003). Aware of the importance of
“playing by the ocean’s rules”, expert surfers pass
on this Wave Knowledge and “sea reading” ability,
in each surf spot, to their infants and local peer
group (Carroll, 1994) (Young, 2003) (Hall, 2004)
(Rocha, 2008) (Pereira, 2001) (Jarvis, 2004). “The
best surfers learn from the very best, growing up
immersed in a multi-generational culture of
complete ocean awareness” (Slater, 2005).
Among beach users, this “awareness” is
misunderstood; these “secrets of the sea” are
complex and not obvious. The urban common sense
and the general teachings of classic mechanics are
inappropriate in the Portuguese coast bathing zones,
a chaotic system with ocean waves and currents.
Here wave heights remain above 1 meter for 95% of
the year, and above 4 m for 5% of the year (Instituto
de Meteorologia, 2007). Moreover, some natural
environments, like high-mountain, rafting waters,
scuba-diving depths, and surf zones, require being
aware that human technology and intellect cannot
domesticate the forces in presence. Nature, although
accessible in artificial coastal zones (of banal
urbanization and coastal compression), is wild.
When facing a challenge with a danger level beyond
one’s competences (knowledge, skills, aptitudes),
there must be full consciousness that, by insisting,
the experience may become adverse or even
disastrous and tragic (Swarbrooke, 2003). In this
leisure practice of surf bathing, it is fundamental,
vital, to be informed and aware of the risks, being
able to identify the intensity and dynamics of
nature’s forces present, as well as the hazardous
places (Surf Life Saving Association of Australia,
1974). The flat water swimming skills and
swimmers’ physical fitness are not enough to ensure
the ability to return to the coast, as the Portuguese
Lifeguard Manual advises (Pereira, 2001).
1.3 Surfing, Best Surfer, Surf Master
In sporting terminology the correct and officially
admitted vocabulary is necessary, as it allows to
convey precisely all the technical elements. The
words must be accurate to avoid misunderstandings
from practitioners and technicians, “or even in the
translation of a text” (Peixoto, 1993). A section is
dedicated to operational definitions to define the
problem, in the full text of the thesis. All expressions
or terms in any form considered technical (i.e. not
generally known) appearing in the problem are
defined, as the investigator considers it. Any
ambiguous term, or a special meaning in the context
of this study, albeit in common use, are clarified.
“Surfing breaks have great social and economic
value for coastal communities. In order to preserve
and enhance these resources, a common language is
needed that will bridge the gap between the
colloquial slang of surfers and the technical
language of scientists and policy makers. This
language is the science of surfing waves and surfing
breaks” (Scarfe & al, 2003).
This short paper does not include the revisions of
the subjects Oceanography, Meteorology,
Hydrography and computer Modelling concepts
regarding physical wave elements, maritime wave
formation and propagation, winds, sea ripples and
fetch, the phenomena of offshore swell characteristic
properties (reflection, refraction, diffraction,
interference) and coastal waves characteristic
properties (shoaling, refraction, diffraction), coastal
processes, wave-currents system and equilibrium
beach profiles, tide elements, seabed, seasonal beach
profiles, erosion and coastline, categorized types of
surfing breaks, main surfing wave parameters
(“surfability”), artificial reef breaks, maritime
agitation characteristics in the Portuguese coast, and
temporal conjunction effects (like coastal jets,
rogues, exceptional wave sets, onshore wind setup,
storm-surge, spring tides, current effects). They can
be consulted in the thesis.
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and
in Wave Catching
105
1.3.1 True Surfing
Surf in the English language designates the maritime
surface waves breaking in coastal zone (breakers). In
Portuguese Surf designates the Surfing sport itself,
Surfe is used in Brazilian.
The “To surf” definition must be considered,
since it concerns the essence of the proficiency
studied. This is the sport of surfing (he’e nalu
(wave-sliding), surf-bathing, Hawaiian sport of surf
playing, swell driving, surf riding, surf board
swimming, wave-riding, surfing). “Surfing is the
sport of riding across the face of a wave while
standing on a specialized board” (Orbelian, 1982)
“The art of standing up while riding diagonally
across a wave front” (Finney & Houston, 1996);
“Travel on the wave […] slide on the wall of the
wave, […] towards the beach” (Moreira, 2007).
Therefore, it should be clear that any Surfer is
always referring to a wave face ride
(Finney&Houston, 1996) (Young, 1983) (Pukui,
2003) (Warshaw, 2005), never to a straight-off ride
on the white-water wash of the collapsed wave. We
also refer to the judging rules: “The contestant that
systematically chooses the waves that close out
should be penalized (in the score) for having choice
and acting against the spirit of surfing” (Jonet,
1989). Catching a wave means a controlled descent
through turns, travelling/cutting the wall of wave,
i.e. in nautical terms manoeuvring. This greatly
reduces the location of quality peaks, and the
opportunities for surfing (good waves available from
the whole sets).
It has huge implications on proficiency, for the
outside must be reached, and the lineup must be
read, to find the first take-off zone (the point where
the swell collapses to become surf): they have to
deal with the currents and the possibility of not
being able to catch waves (i.e., returning to shore!).
Very strong indignation was caused by tourists
bragging of being surfers when poorly riding in
white-water from small broken waves, while they
understood nothing of the Ocean (Crowe, 2002); so
in 1911 native Hawaiians revived the practice of
“true surfing”, in the organized form of a the Hui
Nalu club (Finney&Houston, 1996) (Hall, 2004).
1.3.2 Surf Master’s Expertise
“A masterful surfer is a product of (usually) around
20 years of concerted, directed effort, a hundred
different surf spots, several hundred boards and a
couple of hundred thousand waves” (Carroll, 1994).
Mastery in surfing is a result of refining the general
knowledge of the surf dynamics; it derives from
“local wave knowledge”; and it allows efficiency
through conjunction to surf energies. “All beaches
are different and each surfer is the individual able to
realize the surrounding situation” (Amaro, 1989).
This “experience and expertise to handle the big
surf” (Coleman, 2001), or “most masterful surfer"
(Melekian, 2004), differs from the daily tricks
performance from the “best surfer/ most skilful”.
Surf Masters are the experts who are relevant to
observe and question in order to record their
procedures in surf reading, so that we have a chance
to organise this wave knowledge. “Every surf spot
will have its own characteristic wave, which will
change according to tide, swell, and wind”
(Orbelian, 1982). “[D]ominance is ability
supplemented by knowledge. Knowledge developed
over time. Knowledge acquired by consistency.”
(Melekian, 2004).
2 OBJECTIVES
We aim to classify and systematize the expert
surfer’s wave knowledge, “using objective,
accessible, exact, concise sport terminology”
(Peixoto, 1993).
The goal is to understand and organise the surfing
master’s knowledge about the surf and currents, so
that information for spacial and temporal pattern
recognition at sea, surf and currents may become
public, having a practical application for Beach
Safety.
2.1 Starting Question and Problem
In order to fit the line of investigation, an initial,
very broad, question arose to review the knowledge
already produced about the various areas of study:
‘It is possible to systematize the knowledge about
the surf zone that defines surfer's proficiency,
whether in sports practice or in sea rescuing?’
The Problem consists simply in an expansion of
the study title (‘Surf Masters: Systematization of the
knowledge of relevant signals in evaluating the surf
zone’) presented as this general statement: ‘the goal/
purpose of this research is human life safeguard,
systematizing the practical surf zone knowledge that
defines a surfer’s proficiency, knowledge used to
evaluate the surf conditions, find and catch the surf,
by using the relevant visual signals from the waves-
currents system’. We question the most efficient
lifeguards in beaches with surf, and analyse the
motor tasks essential both to the sport and surf
rescuing.
icSPORTS 2015 - International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
106
“Wave judgement is the most difficult aspect of
surfing to master. It takes years to accumulate the
experience needed to deal with the multitude of
situations the sea is capable of” (Orbelian, 1982).
We research into the possibility to systematize the
surfer’s “wave knowledge” about wave-currents
dynamics in the surf zone by using a classification of
the relevant signals from the coastal process
(dynamic, non-linear). For risk assessment, the game
rules, the context evaluation, the “ocean reading”
ability, the “wave knowledge” skills: “Which are
visual cues that enable evaluating the variables
specifiers of the characteristics of waves and
currents, and especially which are relevant to the
surfing conditions at hand?”.
“Most accomplished big wave riders are in their
thirties. It takes a long time to build the experience
and, mainly, the judgement required to ride big
waves” (Ricky Grigg, in Noll & Gabbard, 1989).
The associated problem is the “wave judgement”,
skill necessary to catch waves: “Which are the
relevant signals about the surf shape characteristics,
to evaluate the plan where the breaking wave passes,
and its profile and strengths?”.
2.2 Pertinence and Complexity
“The area of the coast where the waves break is one
of the most difficult maritime regions to study due to
the high intensity and non-linearity of the waves and
currents. Beyond the scientific interest motivated by
open issues, it is a strip that we need to understand,
that it is crucial to coastal erosion, dissipating wave
energy, coastal works, sediment transport, pollutant
dispersion, surfing and safety of swimmers and
boats” (Bicudo, 2007).
The task of reading and understanding the ocean
waves (“observe, analyse, decode, compare and
deduce”), is ambitious, “somewhat foolish for the
extreme complexity involved” (Dupouey, 1997). We
pursue an original task of explaining the reading of
the signals picked up on the ocean coastal waves and
currents dynamics; parameterizing objectively the
essence of a shared collective consciousness (Slater,
2005). And by doing it in a maritime population that
share a feeling of competition among themselves,
cohesive and used to live in uncertainty and danger
(Moreira, 1987), for whom any spreading of the
“local wave knowledge” (such as surf-travel
guidebooks, surf-reports, surf-trip diaries) is
“regarded by many surfers as nothing less than
heretical, as it revealed in just a few short pages
information that had taken local surfers years to
accumulate” (Warshaw, 2005). Even in lifeguard
courses, it is advised to have “practical experience in
surfing” in order to acquire this “knowledge and
experience from spending many hours in surfing”,
and “discussion with old hands” is also suggested
(Surf Life Saving Association of Australia, 1975). In
Portuguese Lifeguard Manual (Instituto de Socorros
a Náufragos) this complex knowledge is condensed
in 7 pages of elementary information. This
divulgation of information to the public was already
urgent in 1970, when the beach surveillance was
reinforced, as well as the training and divulgation to
prevent sea accidents (Pereira, 2001). Today, it is
still up to the bather’s experience the deadly trial and
error evaluation of “environmental conditions”.
2.3 Hypotheses
Hypotheses are the answers to the starting question
that the Problem in study raises, i.e. plausible
predictions as result of the literature research. In
Oceanography, a “systematic and considered
approach” is required for discovery given that the
ocean (climate) system “can be characterized by
modes that can be thought of as naturally occurring
patterns of variability, with each pattern exhibiting
unique spatial characteristics but typically vague
temporal characteristics”: “the knowledge about
patterns and processes in the ocean results from the
observations of relevant parameters” (Anderson,
2003). And “Surfing is a feeling for the sea, a
combination of love, knowledge, respect, fear –
instinctive perception gained through repetitive
contact” (Wardy, in George, 2001).
“Observation is an essential prerequisite to
identifying and understanding the complex patterns
and trends of variability in the ocean, complemented
by hypothesis-driven studies focusing on cause and
effect [with non-linear relations in these systems].
The study of these patterns, identified by
experienced scientists, starts in observation, then
using intuition (inductive method), requires the right
questions, leads to “suggestions of possible
interconnexions between unrelated facts, in the
complexity and subtle relations of patterns and
processes” (Tomczak, 2002). Intuition from
experience is expressed in the words of the “King of
Pipeline” (Jenkins, 1991): “One of the things you
learn riding the waves consistently is your ability to
find a pattern, or a rhythm, in the randomness of the
ocean” (Stewart, 2011).
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and
in Wave Catching
107
2.3.1 Hypothesis 1: Indicators for
Perception of Practice Conditions
H#1: For perception of practice conditions, expert
surfers use indicators of sea conditions regarding
specifier variables of coastal morphology,
bathymetry, breaking waves–currents system, tides,
and local winds.
2.3.2 Hypothesis 2: Valuation of Indicators
According to Practice Conditions
H#2: Expert surfers value different indicators
according to practice conditions: wave heights and
type of surfbreak (seabed sedimentary or
permanent).
2.3.3 Hypothesis 3: Indicators for
Perception of Wave Profile
H#3: Expert surfers use indicators of ramp shape
and edge shape for perception of the formation,
speed and strength of breaking wave profiles.
2.3.4 Hypothesis 4: Indicators for
Perception of Wave Plan
H#4: Expert surfers use indicators of wave wall
shape for perception of the formation, speed and
strength of breaking wave plan.
3 LITERATURE RESEARCH
There are no previous studies on visual signs for risk
assessment on open sea bathing zones. For a
classification of Wave Knowledge, we start the
compilation with the analysis of the fundamental
concepts of Coastal Oceanography, coastal process
factors, wave-currents system dynamics, ocean wave
elements and properties, wave properties at the coast
and surf zone characteristics. We researched coastal
engineering studies in wave-currents interaction, for
the conjunction occurrences. We attend into nautical
scales for wind and sea strength. We narrowed the
research by considering the characteristic parameters
used in computer modelling for wave forecasting
and wave simulation models. We collected the
relevant variable specifiers to monitor wind, sea and
surf conditions and its evolution in space and time,
data available in real-time measurements from
systematized sources, like data for the evaluation of
surf conditions at the beaches, in the scope of
Maritime Safety. From Portuguese Navy’s
Hydrographic Institute, and Meteorology Institute,
we obtained the Characterization of the Climate, and
Maritime Agitation, on the Portuguese coast, to
know the seasonal sea typical conditions, in typical
situations. In order to understand the sediment
movement in sandy beaches, we checked coastal
erosion processes and seasonal beach profiles.
Determinant clues come from recent Surf
Science studies, by surfers, not only on Surf
Forecast and “surf spot guides”, but now on wave
types and profiles, surf break types and ocean
bottom topography and bathymetry (scientific
investigation held also in Portuguese relevant surf
spots), “surfability parameters” (Bicudo, 2007) and
breaking waves conditionings (also for Portuguese
artificial surf reefs).
Exploratory readings from publications of
surfing culture helped our route, due to the
complexity of order the phenomena in this dynamic
and chaotic environment, with the immense
variability of conditions it may present. First we
defined the components of a Surf Master (ability,
knowledge of surf conditions, experience). Then
found examples of intergenerational retransmission
of local surf spot knowledge. From literature
research of surfing master pioneers in extreme
surfing, the prospective procedures on their lineup
search are picked. We look at sailor’s navigation
history/ manuals for knowledge of piloting
techniques when near unknown seashores. Also, in a
method triangulation, to strengthen this exploratory
study, using observation in competition, we
researched the actions that distinguish surfing
champions, the surf lining up (at the primary take-
off zone) and the (best) wave catching.
4 MODEL OF INSTRUMENT
INTERACTION
This section is dedicated to the sport systematics
approach “Model for the Interaction of Instruments”
(Peixoto&Ferreira, 1994) (Peixoto, 1997) (Peixoto&
Moreira, 1999) (Peixoto, 2000) (Moreira, 2007).
Since our object of study is the sport of surfing,
in the perceptual component of the practitioners, it is
not possible to use the hierarchy of variables
specifiers of natural elements, ranking it for
systematization. Therefore we use the term
Classification, “the act/ process of classifying each
variable in itself” and also “the possible relationship
between the [...] variables” (Fernandes, 2000), using
grids to order the phenomena, in a methodical way
to showcase the different components of this system.
icSPORTS 2015 - International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
108
“Analysing sports performance is no more than
structuring the different variables/ instruments,
clearly and objectively as a resource for effectively
improving the technical intervention” (Peixoto,
2000).
The full text of the thesis, available online at the
University Repository, contains the classification
tables, created for the Wave Knowledge
Classification (signals used for evaluating surf
conditions), and the Wave Judgement Classification
(signals used for evaluating breaking waves
components – form, speed and strength). These
classifications were the basis of the survey for the
experimental methodology of this research.
It also includes the analysis of the motor tasks
essential to surfing practice (and to Surf Rescuing),
directly related to the wave knowledge: “Surf lineup
positioning” and “Wave catching” – identifying the
primary wave take-off area, navigating to lineup,
choosing the wave, defining the entry point, carrying
out the final approach and starting the slide/fall on
the wave face. Furthermore, we present a breakdown
of the “Take-off technique”, and a table of
“Classification of Surfing Manoeuvres”, organised
by level of difficulty and by the part of wave face
where it is performed.
5 EXPERIMENTAL
METHODOLOGY
This master thesis researches Ocean reading skills.
With the goal to present this knowledge organised
and quantified, based on information gathered in
literature research, indicators were systematized for
evaluation of practice conditions and recognizing
patterns and trends (padrões e tendências, in
Portuguese) at the coastal process and on the surf.
For testing this Classification through a research
instrument, namely to gather information by
inquiring a group representative of the population in
study – the best Portuguese surfers –, we created a
Questionnaire, designated “Relative valuing, by
expert practitioners, of signals in the surf zone for
the optimization of wave catching” (“Valorização
relativa, por praticantes peritos, de sinais na zona
de surf para a optimização da entrada na onda”, in
Portuguese). The design was completed in
December 2007, and the implementation took place
in January 2008.
5.1 Validity and Guarantee of the
Instruments
The questionnaire was subject to validation, through
expert opinion test, with the collaboration of
Professor Bicudo, also a surfer with 15+ years of
experience and teacher of surf forecast for surf
coaches.
The theoretical grounding, based on the
classification made, followed strict guidelines on
information sources due to the pioneering and
exploratory character of this research. In the
literature review, information from the essential
parameters of coastal Oceanography and
Meteorology was gathered, such as the ones
monitored for the navy institutes, used for modelling
surf forecasts, as well the ones referred to in surf
modelling studies. As regards journalistic sources
(surf magazines), we considered articles resulting
from fundamented investigation, such as
dictionaries, historical reviews, and biographies. For
publications, books about surfing, only used author’s
considerations after a critical analysis, searching the
original sources and writers known for excelling as
surfers, especially when they become academics and
research on studies in the areas of Oceanography,
Sports Training, History, Anthropology, Sociology
or articles about technique and strategies for success.
The closed options questionnaires are objective
and require less effort from the respondent. Given
the length of the questions, it was the best option; it
also facilitates the processing and analysis of
information by requiring less time. A limitation of
the application of this type of questionnaire is that it
makes answering easier to an individual who did not
know or have difficulty in responding to a particular
issue.
5.2 Population Inquired: National
Surfing Champions
The study required a sample of top Portuguese
expert surfers, that meet this criteria of very relevant
verifiable curriculum in surfing: 1) surfing
experience (at least 15 years of practice); 2) elite
surfer with exceptional results in competition
(achievement of national surf champion title in adult
category); or 2) to be a surf coaches master
(teacher). Since the official competitions began in
1986, the limited universe of the population justifies
considering that respondents are sufficient for valid
general conclusions.
Men and Women are considered alike; they must
meet criteria 1) and 2). A total of 11 elite surfers
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and
in Wave Catching
109
were inquired, 2 women included. Actually, those
were the only women in Portugal that had more than
15 years of surf experience cumulated with national
champion titles, for that PL won almost all the
feminine titles (11) and a Guinness World Record
for that. Ages range from 32 to 42, practice time is
above 20 years (except for 2 subjects), 5 are
Physical Education university graduates, 2 authors
of master theses on surfing and 1 PhD in Physics.
All the surf coach masters and all the women meet
the criteria, and several respondents are professional
surf coaches.
5.3 Instrument: Questionnaire
“Relative Valuing, by Surf Masters,
of Signals in the Surf Zone”
The data was retrieved by means of a questionnaire,
with a two level "Rating Scale" (options important/
not important, or no opinion), divided in four parts:
Instructions, Identification, Wave judgement skills,
Wave knowledge skills:
Part 1) Presentation of the project “Proficiency in
positioning in the surf zone and wave catching
choice of relevant signals from the natural context”
and Instructions (1 page);
Part 2) Personal Data (1 page): identification,
profession, academic/ technical formation in sport,
champion titles and years of surf experience, wave
size specialization;
Part 3) Wave Catching motor task, regarding
Wave Judgement skills (4 pages, 75 items, 75
marks). Studies the skill of evaluating the breaking
wave; it’s presented as a classification of indicator
signals from breaking waves’ formation in the surf
zone: points, lines, speeds and strengths from:
1: Wave Profile (1.1 Ramp shape: sub
subcategories 1.1.1 Slope of wave ramp, 1.1.2
Transition curve; 1.2 Lip shape: sub subcategories
1.2.1 Lip thickness, 1.2.2 Lip curtain length, 1.2.3
Lip curve/ tube shape, 1.2.4 Lip strength);
2: Wave Plan (2.1 Wall shape: sub subcategories
2.1.1 Wave wall height, 2.1.2 Wall slope, 2.1.3 Wall
length, 2.1.4 Wall curve, 2.1.5 Angle of swell line
peeling, 2.1.6 Wall curl speed; 2.2 Sections shape:
sub subcategories 2.2.1 Wave sections, 2.2.3 Force
lines, 2.2.4 Force zones in wave sections).
Part 4) Surf Lineup Positioning Motor task,
regarding Wave Knowledge skills (9 pages, 160
items, 595 marks). Studies the skill of sea reading;
it’s presented as a classification of indicator signals
from sea agitation (combined sea ripples and swell
undulation), surf zone bottom configuration and
depth, wave-currents system, wind, tides:
1: Swell > Wave interaction from Groundswell
and Windswell (Sub categories for Surf Conditions:
1.1 Good; 1.2: Medium; 1.3 Easy; 1.4 Difficult; 1.5
Dangerous);
2: Seabed > Wave interaction (Subcategories for
Maritime Geology and Bathymetry on coastal zone:
2.1 Coastline and natural/ artificial obstacles; 2.2
Seabed; 2.3 Surf zone bottom);
3: Currents > Wave interaction (Subcategories
for Water circulation cells, or currents types: 3.1 3.2
3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10);
4: Wind > Wave interaction (Subcategories 4.1
Large scale atmospheric circulation; 4.2 Local
winds);
5: Tide > Wave interaction (Subcategories 5.1
Tide state; 5.2 Spring Tides; 5.3 Neap Tides; 5.4
Onshore wind Setup and Storm Surge conditions);
6: Atmospheric conditions > Visibility signs.
The 160 questions from wave knowledge survey was
the most complex part, since each item had four
options, which meant that each item was actually a
set of four questions: this was done by allowing
independent selection for “Big”/ “Medium”/ “Small
wave” sizes (and for Medium waves also divided in
“Rocky”/ “Sandy” options) – the scale is clearly
included in the Instructions. Some situations do not
have options to mark in all wave sizes options (e.g.,
for the situation Sea Wind – small waves in the
Fetch generating location), therefore the total
number of marks allowed is less than “number of
questions x4”. This enables us to study the lining up
procedures for reaching the primary take-off zone
for these combinations: a) Small/ Medium/ Big wave
heights, and b) Defined Peak/ Multiple peaks.
The total questions number was 235 (75+160),
with 670 choices to mark (75+595); this high
number of indicators inquired reflects the
complexity of analysing/ ordering the very dynamic
(and in a non-linear system) surf zone practice
conditions, and, of course, highlights the expertise
needed to understand the concepts and situations
inquired.
In order to balance the number of questions, it
was designed in digital format (Microsoft Excel),
distributed individually by email, and the item
selection was possible using the keyboard’s arrow
keys and space bar. The respondents would save a
version that was immediately available for data
collection and analysis.
Considering what Bicudo writes about this
survey “these descriptors are too detailed, possibly
waves can be described with fewer parameters”, this
reflects the modelling studies of conditions in the
coastal zone and more particularly on Simulation of
icSPORTS 2015 - International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
110
Waves with software for Artificial surf Reefs
(Cardoso, 2007), of which the author was mentor.
The inquiry had that goal, so that the surfers were
filtered from all the cues presented, as we will see in
the following conclusions.
5.4 Data Analysis
In the global analysis of the grid filling of the
questionnaire we immediately find partial responses
to the hypotheses being studied. From the statistical
analysis of the results we find critical items marked
unanimously as important, and strong categories are
revealed. These main results are presented below.
5.4.1 Hypotheses Verified as True
The propositions that respond to our initial question
are verified as true: H#1 respondents mark the most
signs systematized – they do attend to all elements
of nature in presence; H#2.1 differentiate clearly the
relative importance of the visual signs according to
the wave height scale – surfers value the same signs
differently according to the current surf conditions
(it is observed that they consider more details in
bigger wave conditions or more diffuse windseas);
H#2.2 they need to use more signals at beach breaks
than on stable reef breaks – surfers differentiate the
importance of items according to wave break type.
Therefore our researching Hypotheses about Wave
Knowledge are found true, respectively: H#1. Expert
surfers use indicators of sea conditions regarding
variable specifiers of coastal morphology,
bathymetry, wave-currents system, tides and local
winds for perception of practice conditions; H#2.
Expert surfers value the different indicators
attending to practice situations: H#2.1 according to
the surf height; H#2.2 indicators are valued
according to surf zone bottom type.
The Hypotheses about Wave Judgement are
found true, respectively: H#3. Expert surfers do
divide the wave profile evaluation attending the
slope, ramp shape for the bottom part of the breaker,
and edge thickness/ lip form for the top part; H#4.
Surfers evaluate the form of the wall on the wave
front line for perception of the breaker plan.
5.4.2 Correct Assumptions – Women and
Men are Equally Surf Masters
The assumptions where found correct. The logical
premises underlying this problem (“knowledge and
evaluation of forces in the surf”) were reduced to
minimum so as not to interfere with the validity of
the results, and do not refer to the research method
followed (questionnaire survey) to validate the
classifications systematized. Having found in all
bibliographic research no gender difference
regarding wave knowledge skills, we assumed that
expert surfers could be inquired regardless of
gender. In fact, princesses surfers where much
praised in ancient sport of surfing (Finney &
Houston, 1996) (Pukui, 2003) (Hall, 2004), before
the “civilization” brought role differentiation of
gender in this practice (Gabbard, 2000) there were
always proficient women surfers (Hull, 1976)
(George, 2001) (Brown, 2002) (Heimann, 2004)
(Ford and Brown, 2006) and women have been
training competition surf since it is a profession
(Lowdon, 1988). While outside the scope of the
study, we found no differences in the responses from
the men and women inquired: they are expert
surfers, Portuguese national champions with 15+
years’ experience alike. The results allow us to say
that women and men are equally surf masters.
5.5 Main results - Critical Points for
Reading the Surf
The responses to the different items were processed
in Microsoft Excel, with data first treated by means
of descriptive statistical techniques, analysing
mainly the percentage of occurrences. On closer
examination of the results, we highlighted the
critical points to meet in evaluating the surf (items
considered unanimously as important) and strong
categories (groups of items for each element of the
system) from each factor inquired (Waves, Bottom,
Currents, Wind, Tides). We considered those items
with at least 9 positive responses, from the total of
the 11 experts inquired. Therefore the percentages of
82% or higher, in the analysis by item, are presented
as unequivocally important, and ordered below.
From the various ways to identify visually each
signal (variable of each element), surfers marked
which they use and which despise. These data were
analysed and included in the tables in Appendix.
5.5.1 Swell – Fundamental Signals for
Evaluation of Maritime Agitation
The Total Sea present is the result of the
superposition of windswell ripples and groundswell
undulation (“o Mar total presente é o conjunto da
sobreposição do mar de vento – windswell e
ondulação – groundswell”, in the Portuguese
original). To assess the characteristics of the Swell
and Total Sea, expert surfers consider:
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and
in Wave Catching
111
1. Maritime Agitation: totality of superposition of
waves groups comprising ripples and swell
(average height, period, direction, exceptional sets);
2. Swell Height, extension of wash zone;
3. Swell Direction (angle of arrival to coast);
4. Swell Direction Good/ bad (distance of rides,
good wave formation);
5. Swell Period (time between two wave fronts);
6. Characteristics Associated with the Swell
periods of less than 8-10 sec, 10-14 sec and more
than 14 sec (respective heights, length and speed);
7. Condition of the Swell (new, maintaining, old),
e.g.: period of the waves lowering, power
lowering, less frequent series);
8. Grouping Patterns Characteristics (number of
waves per set, size and formation within the same
series [best / biggest waves and how many]).
5.5.2 Swell – Fundamental Signals for
Evaluation of Practice Conditions
To assess the characteristics of the Swell and to
read Practice Conditions, expert surfers consider:
1. Identification of defined peak, consistent,
allowing positioning by lineup of known marks;
2. Identification of defined peak, inconsistent,
necessary to adjust at each set;
3. Identification of characteristics of short period
waves (short wavelength, slow speed, less strength);
4. Timing of sets arrival, duration and lulls
duration;
5. Typical conditions of windswell: situation of
multiple peaks, several wave heights and
directions;
6. Difficult Conditions with Small Waves (local
windswell, disordered and irregular waves, with
undefined peaks), short period waves, different sizes
and directions;
7. Dangerous Conditions with Bigger Waves (sea
and wind creating strong currents, waves breaking
randomly with several patterns present, swell and
ripples from various sizes and directions, sets and
lulls unpredictable, peak and lineup changing).
5.5.3 Seabed – Fundamental Signals for
Evaluation of Type of Surfing Break
To assess the characteristics of the Coastal
Geology and surf zone Batimetry, and also to
define the lineup and references for the lining up
technique, expert surfers consider:
1. Seabed Nature and Type of surf break
(pointbreak, reefbreak, beachbreak, mix);
2. Objects at Sea or shore, relevant to navigating;
3. Reference Marks at the Coastline, for lining up;
4. Danger Coastal Zones, currents/rocks/shorebreaks;
5. Seabed Topography/ Bathymetry/ Slope, when
exposed at low tides, wave sections rising and
breaking (shallows) or crest lowering and speeding
up (deep channel), distance from surf to shore.
5.5.4 Currents – Fundamental Signals for
Localization of Water Circulation Cells
To assess the characteristics of Maritime
Currents types and to the localization of the water
circulation cells, expert surfers consider:
1. Water Volume in current zone: width and
depth;
2. Zones of Surface Turbulence (chop), with
white foam remaining on lulls;
3. Speed of Water moving in the current: surfer’s
displacement, or white-water or floating objects;
4. Strength of the Wash of water moving in the
current (height/ speed of white-water);
5. Location and Speed of Alongshore
Currents: water flowing across the beach in
channels between sandbars/ submarine ridges;
6. Rip Current: zones of convergence of
longitudinal currents, producing a strong wash
flow directing offshore, perpendicular to the
shoreline;
7. Wave-currents System: wave breakers zone
over elevated ridges >> alongshore current >>
ripcurrents in channels between surf;
8. Current Zones, identified by seabed
morphology;
9. Coastaljet Current: Ripcurrent extending
further than the outside: due to piers, deep
channel (bay), rocks, junction alongshore
currents, rivermouth;
10. Increased Water Flow in Channel of
reduced width, next to rocks and artificial
constructions (jetty structures, piers);
11. Ripcurrent across the Lineup;
12. Riptide Current: increased water flow due to
tide getting low;
13. Rivermouth: increased water flow;
14. Shorebreak: wave height, frequency, strength;
15. Wave Surge: wave wash back to sea –
undertow current and backwash waves;
16. Lulls between sets at shorebreak;
17. Current Drift: according relining up.
5.5.5 Coastal Winds – Fundamental Signals
for Evaluation of Sea Surface
To assess the characteristics of Coastal Winds and
valuation of the sea surface and surf formation,
expert surfers consider:
1. Intensity and Strength of Coastal Wind (effects
at sea/ waves/ at land);
2. Effects at Waves from Wind: neutral conditions
(windless), favourable (offshore), adverse (onshore);
icSPORTS 2015 - International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
112
3. Local Variation of Sea Breeze: daytime
variation of wind Direction and intensity;
4. Forecast of Typical Local Winds for synchro-
nization to the best conditions.
5.5.6 Tides – Fundamental Signs for
Evaluation of Water Depth
To assess the characteristics from Tides and
evaluation of the state of the water depth at the surf
zone, expert surfers consider:
1. Tide Period: daily cycle of low and high tides:
one each 12h e25 min;
2. Tide Direction: getting low or high, and
influence at ocean water depth;
3. Tide State and Effects on Breakers (breaking
spot and steepness, lineup);
4. Tide State better for the Surf Spot;
5. Water Depths, looking at the plan where the
peeling wave passes;
6. Depth Quick Changes when in Half tide phase
(in 2h half of the total water level from tide
moves);
7. Tide Conjunction Effects of Greater Ampli-
tude: difficult, quickly changing conditions;
8. Difficult Conditions for Entering/ leaving the
ocean, due to tide state;
9. Local Influence of Effects for Amplifying Swell
Height: peaks good at low tides, or at other phase;
10.Forecast of Local Tide Typically Good for
synchronization to the best surf spot conditions.
5.5.7 Atmosphere – Fundamental Signs for
Evaluation of Visibility
To assess the characteristics of factors regarding
Visibility, expert surfers consider:
1. Poor Visibility: Low Light (sunrise and sunset);
low contrast (foggy – sky and ocean on same
colours); backlight from sun (after midday, at
Portuguese West coast);
2. Low Visibility (Mist or Fog): increased attention
to other signs of waves arrival and passage – surf
sound, perception of surf direction and height
when swell front line passes, bubbles from ridges,
surfacing sediments, perception of currents
speeds.
6 CONCLUSIONS
In sport systematization, we look for means to
quantify and reduce the complexity by relations
between different systems, creating strategies to
simplify everything that looked cluttered/ complex
(Peixoto and Ferreira, 1994). The most relevant
results retrieved from data analysis information,
complying to the relationship with the objectives and
researched hypotheses, show the fundamental points
for the expert surfer’s knowledge used to assess the
surf conditions, systematized (ordered, classified,
then filtered on its importance) in this study. This
led us to the definition of this “wave knowledge”
skill.
We can now answer our starting question and
say: it is possible to systematize the surfer’s “wave
knowledge” about wave-currents dynamics in the
surf zone, by means of a classification of their usage
of relevant visual signals from the coastal process
when evaluating the surf zone.
Regarding the Wave Knowledge, results show
that very experienced surfers evaluate variable
specifiers of all elements of the “waves-currents
system”, considering of greater importance the
factors related to identifying the location, type and
intensity of maritime currents (except under
conditions of small waves), and the swell
characteristics (mainly the direction and angle of
arrival to coast, height, period). The importance of
the characteristics of each element observed varies
according to the wave height and for wave breaks
types (“multiple peaks”/ “lined-up peaks”, roughly
corresponding to ocean bottom types sedimentary/
stable). They pay attention to the configuration/
depth of oceanic bottom, and coast profile.
As for the Wave Judgement, for evaluating the
quality of the surf, surfers consider the general
characteristics of the coastal wind and temporal
characteristics of the tides. For assessing the strength
of the surf and perception of the take off point of
descent, surfers focus on the characteristics of the
different sections (plan of the swell line peeling
zone, or where the curling wave has its critical zone)
and wave face profiles (analysing the slope and
thickness; the bottom curve and top edge/ lip form).
6.1 “Wave Knowledge” Skill, Critical
Points for Surf Reading
These are the critical points to consider in surf
zone reading and objectivity in risk assessment.
For surf conditions evaluation, the fundamental
signs from the coastal process, concerning the
general characteristics of waves and currents, are:
1. Identification of the Maritime Currents:
localization, directions and intensities of the water
circulation cells in the surf zone (except for small
wave conditions, under 1m); mostly to these types
of coastal currents (other drifts are negligible):
1.1. Ripcurrents (agueiro in Portuguese), zones
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and
in Wave Catching
113
of concentrated current return:
1.1.1. Alongshore currents in places of
longitudinal currents convergence (correntes
longitudinais/ paralelas à costa, in Portuguese);
1.1.2. Ripcurrents in deep water channel
(agueiros de canais profundos);
1.1.3 Riptides (correntes de maré);
1.2. Wave surge and undertow (correntes de
retorno da onda na rebentação direta na costa).
2. Characteristics of coastal geology:
2.1. Seabed type, forms and obstacles;
2.2. Wave break type (point, reef, beach, mix);
2.3. The interaction wave-bottom.
3. Coastal wind characteristics influencing state of
sea surface and surf formation (direction, intensity).
4. Characteristics of the Tide state.
6.2 “Wave Judgement” Skill Definition,
for Wave Formation Evaluation
These are the critical points to consider in wave
judgement. For wave formation evaluation, the
fundamental signs from the coastal process,
concerning the wave profile (ramp shape and ledge
shape, divided where the wave face bends) and wave
plan (wall shape of the breaking wave), are:
1. Location of the Primary Peak and Wave Form
at that Spot (height, slope, wave wall shape, edge
shape);
2. Swell Line Characteristics;
3. Wave Sections Characteristics;
4. Wave Profile, differentiating the top and lower
part of the wave incline;
4.1. Ramp slope (lower part of the wave incline)
4.2. Ramp shape, “fat” or “concave”
4.3. Edge thickness (top part of the wave incline)
4.4. Thickness and strength of the falling lip
4.5. Length of the falling lip
6.3 Extreme Caution Situations
A word on extreme danger situations that were
described unanimously throughout the investigation
that can suddenly arise: any fast rising swell; storm
surge or fetch passing; an exceptional set of rogue
waves; coastal jet ripcurrents; sudden occurrence of
fast moving currents (over 1m/sec) by conjunction
of: very angled to coastline swell direction/ riptide/
deep channel/ confluence of alongshore/ tide state/
currents; big wave (over 3m) swells; endless sets
(waves breaking continuously without lulls); change
in rivermouth flow (such as rain, tide direction
change, sudden opening of dam). Tragedy is
favoured by actions like facing back to shorebreak,
bathing in no surf zones in a beach with surf, going
in surf-swimming without full awareness or advice.
6.4 Recommendations
“When we intend to innovate we question the way
the situations have been organized. [...] When you
try something new, mistakes are made, risks are run,
but it is a form of evolution, in the perspective of
achieving a solution more suitable or better fit in the
different contexts” (Peixoto, 1997). We hope, above
all, to contribute to the public information essential
to Beach Safety, creating a theory for the training of
rescuers, contributing to the scientific area of Sports
Training, laying the foundation for educating
behaviours that become cultural practices.
Application suggestions are available in the thesis
full text, ranging from bather safety to training.
Figure 2: The motivation: Portuguese flag, bathers, Joana.
REFERENCES
Agência Europeia do Ambiente (2006). The changing
faces of Europe’s coastal areas, European Environ-
ment Agency—Relatório nº 6/2006. AEA - Copenhaga.
Alves, J., Sebastião, L., & Bicudo, P. (2007).
Caracterização hidrográfica da praia de S. Pedro para
modelação e implementação de um recife artificial
para a prática de Surf. Departamento de Física,
Instituto Superior Técnico – UTL, from http://www.
blueedge.pt/JPECP/BE_IST_5asJPECP_Caracterizaca
oHidrograficaDeSPedro-Comunicacao.pdf
Anderson, T. (2003). Observation, Hypothesis-Testing,
and Discovery in Oceanography. Oceanography
Society, 17, from http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/GDD/
people/tra/2004A–Oceanog.pdf .
Araújo, D. (2006). Tomada de decisão no desporto. Cruz
Quebrada: Ed. FMH.
ASP. (2010). ASP Rule Book 2010. from www.asp
worldtour.com/pdf/asprulebook
icSPORTS 2015 - International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
114
Baker, B. (1988). Sunset Beach and the swells of North
Pacific. In B. Lowdon (Ed.), Competitive Surfing: a
dedicated approach. Aust: Mouvement Publications.
Bartholomew, W. (1988). Genesis of a competitive surfer.
In B. Lowdon (Ed.), Competitive Surfing: a dedicated
approach. Aust: Mouvement Publications.
Barucq, G. (2007). Accidents lies a la pratique du surf:
epidemologie et prevention. Université Victor Segalen,
Bordeaux.
Bascom, W. (1964). Waves and beaches: the dynamics of
the ocean surface. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.
Bicudo, P. (2007). A Física do surf [Electronic Version]
from http://cfif.ist.utl.pt/~bicudo/ .
Bravo, R., & Pedreira, M. (2004, Julho). O surf vai à
escola. Revista Surf Portugal, 52-60.
Brito, A. P. (1994). Observação directa e sistemática do
comportamento. Lisboa: Ed FMH.
Brogueira, J. (1993, Jan/Fev). Localismo. Revista
Bodyboard Portugal, 56.
Brogueira, J. (1994). Perfil e Motivação para a Prática
Desportiva dos Jovens Praticantes de Bodyboard do
Ericeira Surf Clube. Unpublished Monografia de
Licenciatura, E.S.E. de Setúbal.
Brogueira, J. (1995, Fevereiro). Componentes Críticas das
Habilidades Básicas do Surf e Bodyboard. In Curso de
Treinadores de Surf. S. Pedro Estoril: Federação
Portuguesa de Surf.
Brogueira, J. (1996, Junho). Técnica do Surf, Técnica do
Bodyboard, Pedagogia e Didáctica do Surf,
Metodologia do ensino do Surf, Metodologia do
ensino do Bodyboard. In Textos de Apoio à Acção de
Formação "Ensino do Surf e Bodyboard na Escola"
para Professores de Educação Física. Peniche: EB2,3
D.Luis Ataíde.
Brogueira, J. (1998a, Março-Abril). Componentes Críticas
das Habilidades Básicas do Surf e do Bodyboard.
Horizonte - Revista de Educação Física e Desporto,
XIV, 82, I-VIII.
Brogueira, J. (1998b, Maio/ Junho). Técnica 1 – Take-off:
Arranque na onda, 3 ‘dicas’ fundamentais - os
primeiros passos para começares a surfar. Surf
Magazine, 45, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (1998c, Agosto/ Setembro). Técnica 2 –
Viragens: Noções de Biomecânica das Manobras
actuais do Surf - o surf rail-to-rail. Surf Magazine, 46,
Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (1998d, Outubro/ Novembro). Técnica 3_
Trimming e Backside Trim. Surf Magazine, 47,
Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (1999a, Janeiro). Técnica 4_ Bottom Turn: a
manobra base do surf moderno; mais vertical, mais
forte, mais veloz (o surf top-to-bottom). Surf
Magazine, 48, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (1999b, Abril). Técnica 5_ Roundhouse
Cutback: a manobra mais completa do surf moderno.
Surf Magazine, 49, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (1999c, Junho/ Julho). Técnica 6_ Top Turns
e Roller Coaster: na fronteira entre a viragem e a
batida. Surf Magazine, 50,
Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (1999d, Agosto/ Setembro). Técnica 7_ Off-
the-lip Reentrie: a viragem rasgada. Surf Magazine,
51, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (1999e, Outubro/ Novembro). Técnica 8_
Floater reentrie. Surf Magazine,52, Destacável central,
I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (2000a, Janeiro/ Fevereiro). Técnica 9_ Aerial
reentrie. Surf Magazine, 53, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (2000b, Maio/ Junho 2000). Técnica 10_
Tube ride trimming: a arte de entubar. Surf Magazine,
55, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (2000c, Julho/ Agosto). Técnica 11_
Backside Tube ride trimming: a manobra mais difícil
de aperfeiçoar no surf. Surf Magazine, 56, Destacável
central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (2000d, Setembro/ Outubro). Técnica 12_
Linhas de onda: Classificação das manobras. Surf
Magazine, 57, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (2000e, Junho/ Julho). Longboard: Nose Ride
Trimming. Nose Rider Magazine (in Revista Vert), 1.
Brogueira, J. (2000f, Agosto/ Setembro). Longboard:
Walk-on-the-board, a dança dos pés. Nose Rider
Magazine (in Revista Vert), 2.
Brogueira, J. (2001, Janeiro). Técnica 13_ Snap: a variante
radical dos Cutbacks e Off-the-lips. Surf Magazine,
60, Destacável central, I-IV.
Brogueira, J. (2002, Jan-Fev). Breve história sobre… Surf.
Revista Desporto do Centro de Estudos e Formação
Desportiva, V,1, 26-27.
Butt, T., & Russell, P. (2004). Surf Science: An
introduction to Waves for Surfing. Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press.
Cardoso, N. (2007). Simulação da Ondulação com
FUNWAVE para Recifes para Surf. IST, Lisboa.
Carroll, N. (1993, Set). How to Surf: a guide to surfing
skills. Surfing Magazine Collector's series.
Carroll, N. (1994, Set). How to Surf Better: a guide to
advanced surfing skills. Surfing Magazine Collector's
series.
Casey, S. (2010). The Wave: In Pursuit of the Rogues,
Freaks, and Giants of the Ocean. Knopf Doubleday
Group [Electronic Version] from http://theweek.com/
article/index/207419/the-last-word-terrors-of-the-sea.
Cole, P. (1988). Surfing big waves. In B. Lowdon (Ed.),
Competitive surfing: A Dedicated Approach. Aust:
Mouvement Publications.
Coleman, S. H. (2001). Eddie Would Go: the Story of
Eddie Aikau, Hawaiian Hero and Pioneer of Big Wave
Surfing. New York: St Martin's Press.
Conway, J. (1988). Surfing: guide to the best techniques
and equipment for success. London: Salamander.
Cool, N. T. (2003). The WetSand WaveCast Guide to Surf
Forecasting: A simple approach to planning the
perfect sessions. Lincoln: iUniverse.
Correia, M. C. E. E.(2005). Concepções didácticas e
metodológicas do ensino do surf. Unpublished Tese de
Mestrado, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa,FMH,
Lisboa.
Cralle, T. (1991). The Surfin'ary: A Dictionary of Surfing
Terms and Surfspeak. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and
in Wave Catching
115
Crowe, E. (2002). Duke's Olympic Feet. Waipahu: Island
Heritage.
Dean and Dalrymple. (2007). Shoaling, Refraction, and
Diffraction of Waves. Center for Applied Coastal
Research, Ocean Engineering Laboratory, University
of Delaware from http://www.coastal.udel.edu/ngs/
waves.html .
Dean, R. G. (1991). Equilibrium beach profiles:
Characteristics and applications. Journal of Coastal
Research, 7(1), 53-84.
Dupouey, B. (1997). Guide Surf du swell et des vagues.
Biarritz: Federation Française de Surf.
EUrosion. (2004). European study into coastal erosion,
from http://www.eurosion.org/ .
Famose, J.-P. (1990). Apprentissage Moteur et Difficulté
de la Tâche. Paris: INSEP.
Fernandes, M. C. J. M. (2000). Sistematização da Dança
Tradicional Portuguesa: Classificação das Variáveis
coreográficas Espaço, Ritmo e Gestos técnicos. FMH,
Lisboa.
Figueiredo, P. M. (2007). Caracterização Morfosedimentar
da Praia de Carcavelos. FCUL, Lisboa.
Finney, B. R., & Houston, J. D. (1996). Surfing: A History
of the Ancient Hawaiian Sport (2ª ed.). San Francisco:
Pomegranate Artbooks.
FMH (1975) Os nadadores salvadores especializados de
surf da Austrália mantêm a segurança das praias.
FMH-Biblioteca, Doc 13.
FNMOC (2010). US Navy Fleet Numerical Meteorology
& Oceanography Center, from https://www.fnmoc.
navy.mil/public/welcome/overview.html .
Fonseca, V. (1989). Desenvolvimento Humano: da
Filogénese à Ontogénese da Motricidade. Lisboa:
Editorial Notícias.
Gabbard, A. (2000). Girl in the curl: a century of women
in surfing. Emeryville: Seal.
Gabrielson, B. (1995). Proposed structure for Surfing to
become an Olympic Sport: Pool contest format.
Maryland - Florida: Amateur Athletic Union,
Mountain Man Graphics.
Geomorfologia. (2008). Portal de Geomorfologia, from
http://www.funape.org.br/geomorfologia/cap4/index.php
Godinho (editor), M. (2002). Controlo motor e
aprendizagem: fundamentos e aplicações. Cruz
Quebrada: Ed FMH.
Guisado, R. (2003). The Art of Surfing: a Training Manual
for the Competitive Surfer. Montana: Falcon Guide.
Hall, S. K. (2004). Duke Paoa Kahanamoku, a great
Hawaiian. Honolulu: Bess Press.
Hsu, Y. L., & Kaihatu, J. (1997). Validation test report for
the coastal wave refraction and diffraction model.
Naval Research Laboratory, United States Navy –
Oceanography Division, Ocean Dynamics and
Prediction Branch, from http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/
ADA332946 .
Hull, S. W. (1976). A sociological study of the surfing
subculture. Department of Sociology, San José State
University, San José, from www.lajollasurf.org/
srf_thes.html .
Hurel, A., & Dimulle, C. (1998). Surfeurs de tubes:
Hossegor, le meilleur beach break du monde.
Urrugne: Pimientos.
Instituto de Meteorologia (2007). Características do clima
da Costa de Portugal Continental: Clima de Agitação
Marítima, Características, from http://www.meteo.pt/
resources/im/pdfs/mari–rc–00–00–I.pdf.
Instituto Hidrográfico. (2008). Portal do Instituto
Hidrográfico, from http://www.hidrografico.pt/hidrog
rafico/documentacao/artigos–publicos/artigos–publica
dos.htm
Isebe, I., Mohammadi, M., A.Azerad, I.Ivorra,
B.Bouchette, & D.Denamiel. (2005). Shape
optimization of a sandy coast with the wave
refraction-diffraction REFDIF model coupled to the
BMO optimizer (Gulf of Aigues-Mortes, NW
Mediterranean sea, France). Mathematics and
Modelling Institute e ISTEEM, Montpellier
University, Montpellier.
ISN (1993). Técnicas de Salvamento com Esqui. Caxias:
Instituto de Socorros a Náufragos.
Jenkins, B. (1991, Abril). Is Mike Stewart the best surfer
in the world? Surfer 4, 32.
Jenkins, B. (1993, Março). Portrait Mark Cunningham: Le
Bodysurf dans toute sa pureté. Surfer's Journal, 102-
121.
Kampion, D., and Brown, B. (1998). Stoked: uma história
da cultura do surf. Los Angeles: Evergreen.
Knapp, B. (1984). Desporto e Motricidade. Lisboa:
Compendium.
MacLaren, J. (1997). Learn to Surf. New York: The Lyons
Press.
Magill, R. (1984). Aprendizagem motora: conceitos e
aplicações. São Paulo: Edgard Blucher.
Mao, F. (2004). Skate boarding. Paris: Fitway.
Marinha do Brasil. (2010). Oceanografia Costeira: Marés
[Electronic Version] from http://www.mar.mil.br/
dhn/bhmn/download/cap10.pdf
Marques, M. R. (2001). Navegar. Mem-Martins: Europa-
América.
Melekian, B. (2004, Agosto). For every spot, there is a
surfer: examining the masterful local hero. Surfer
collector's edition, 45, 201-209.
Moreira, C. D. (1987). Populações marítimas em
Portugal: incerteza, competição e flexibilidade na
organização social e nas estratégias adaptativas das
populações de pescadores da orla marítima
continental portuguesa. Instituto Superior de Ciências
Sociais e Políticas, Lisboa.
Moreira, M. (2009). Surf: da Ciência à Prática. Lisboa:
FMH Edições.
Moreira, M. A. A. G. (2007). Matriz de análise das tarefas
desportivas: Sistema de classificação estrutural -
Modelo taxinómico do Surf. Unpublished Tese de
Doutoramento, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa,
FMH, Lisboa.
Morey, T. (1991, Jul). 20 years: the History of
Bodyboarding. Bodyboarding 4, 7.
Newman, V. H. (1967). Teaching an infant to swim: water
safe. USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Noll, G., & Gabbard, A. (1989). Da Bull: Life over the
edge. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
icSPORTS 2015 - International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
116
Orbelian, G. (1982). Essential Surfing. San Francisco:
Orbelian Arts.
Packwood, A. R. (1983). Beach porosity and waves: The
influence of beach porosity on wave uprush and
backwash [Electronic Version].
Palha, A. (2002). Modelação da propagação e deforma-
ção de ondas marítimas em zonas costeiras. LNEC,
Lisboa.
Parry, J. H. (2002). A Descoberta do Mar: uma história
ilustrada dos homens, dos barcos e do mar nos
séculos XV e XVI. Lisboa: Dinalivro.
Peixoto, C. (1993). Ginástica Desportiva. Lisboa: Edições
FMH.
Peixoto, C. (1994, Jul-Set). Os processos ensino "versus"
análise. Ludens 3, 14, 16-18.
Peixoto, C. (1997). Sistemática das Actividades Desporti-
vas: Modelos e Sistemas de Análise do Desempenho
Desportivo. Lisboa: Edições FMH.
Peixoto, C., Fernandes, N., & Martins, J. (1990).
Trampolins Elásticos: Sistematização da
Aprendizagem. Lisboa: Edições FMH.
Peixoto, C., & Ferreira, V. (1994, Jul-Set). Nota
introdutória. Ludens 3, 14.
Pereira, F. D. (2001). Manual do nadador salvador. Cruz
Quebrada: Instituto de Socorros a Náufragos, Edições
FMH.
Pinto, F. T. (2006). Evolução da Erosão Costeira no
Contexto Europeu. Instituto de Hidráulica e Recursos
Hídricos, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade
do Porto, from http://igbp-portugal.org/cluster2006/
comunicacoes/francisco –taveira –pinto/cluster2006-
zc17c-comun.pdf .
Pukui, M. K. (2003). Surfing (he'e nalu): Hawaiian
proverbs celebrating Hawai'i's Royal Sport. Honolulu:
Mutual Publishing.
Rielly, D. (2001, Julho). Como surfar melhor: 15 lendas
mostram-te os segredos do surf. Surf Europe, 11.
Rielly, D. (2006, Set). Tube riding History. Revista
Transworld Surf, 8.
Rocha, J. M. (2008). História do Surf em Portugal: as
origens. Lisboa: Quimera.
Salgado, A. V. (2006). Simulação Visual em Tempo Real
de ondas oceânicas. Universidade Federal
Fluminense, Brasil.
Saraiva, A. E. C. (1973). O meio aquático (natação).
Lisboa: Direcção-Geral da Educação Física e
Desportos.
Scarfe, B. E. (2002). Categorising surfing manoeuvres
using wave and reef characteristics. Department of
Earth Science, The University of Waikato, Hamilton,
New Zealand.
Scarfe, B. E., Elwany, M. H. S., Black, K. P., & Mead, S.
T. (2003). Categorizing the Types of Surfing Breaks
around Jetty Structures. Integrative Oceanography
Division.
Scarfe, B. E., Elwany, M. H. S., Mead, S. T., & Black, K.
P. (2003). The Science of Surfing Waves and Surfing
Breaks - A Review. Integrative Oceanography Division.
Scheibel. (1995). Surf Nazi Culture and the Rhetoric of
Localism.
Searle, L., & England, S. (2004).
Surfgirl's guide to
surfing. Newquay: Orca.
Silva et al, A. J. (2003). Bases mecânicas das actividades
aquáticas Hidrostática: clarificação de conceitos,
implicações práticas e consequências para o ensino.
Vila Real: Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto
Douro.
Silva, M. R. (2000). Contributo para uma sistematização
das habilidades básicas do surf. Unpublished Tese de
Mestrado, Universidade do Porto, FCDEF, Porto.
Silva, M. V. P. (2002). Periodização do treinamento físico
para surfistas competidores. Universidade Federal da
Bahia.
Simoni, C., & Moreau, F. (1994). Skate: aprender,
compreender. Venda Nova: Bertrand.
Slater, E. (2005, Nov.). The path to greatness – seven
secrets to legend status, seven key qualities. Surfing
Magazine, 41.
Slater, K., & Borte, J. (2003). Pipe Dreams: a surfer's
journey, Kelly Slater biography. New York: Harper
Collins.
Slater, K., & Jarratt, P. (2009). For the love: Kelly Slater.
Carcavelos: Prime books.
Snyder, R. (2003). Fit to Surf. Santa Cruz: McGraw-Hill.
Soares, L. (2007). Relatório Coastwatch 2006/07 – O
Papel das Populações na Protecção do Litoral.
GEOTA, Lisboa.
Somers, L. H. (1988). Oceanography for Divers: Waves,
Tides, and Currents. Michigan Univ., Michigan Sea
Grant College Program.
Southerden, L. (2005). Surf's up: the girl's guide to
surfing. New York: Ballantine Books.
Stewart, M. (1994). Bodyboard Tuberiding technique.
Riptide Magazine.
Sufrin, M. (1973). Surfing: how to improve your
technique. New York: Franklin Watts.
Sugimoto, T. (1998). How to Ride a Wave: Mechanics of
Surfing.
Surf Life Saving Association of Australia. (1975a). Surf
boat, Board and ski training manual. Sydney:
SLSAA.
Surf Life Saving Association of Australia. (1975b). Surf
swimming training manual. Sydney: SLSAA.
Swarbrooke J. et al. (2003). Turismo de Aventura:
conceitos e estudos de casos. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Thurman, H. V. (1978). Introductory Oceanography.
Columbus: Charles Merrill.
Toldo, E. E. T., Almeida, L. E. S. B., Nicolodi, J. L.,
Absalonsen, L., & Gruber, N. L. S. (2006). O Controle
da Deriva Litorânea no Desenvolvimento do Campo
de Dunas e da Antepraia no Litoral Médio do Rio
Grande do Sul. Instituto de Geociências, UFRGS
Porto Alegre, RS – Brasil.
Tomczak, M. (2002). Uma Introdução à Oceanografia
Física. Flinders University, Austrália, from www.es.
flinders.edu.au/~mattom/IntroOc/por/índex.html
Tomson, S., & Moser, P. (2011). Surfers Code: Gibbs
Smith.
Warshaw, M. (2005). Encyclopedia of Surfing. New York:
Harcourt.
Systematization of the Knowledge of Relevant Signals in Evaluating the Surf Zone - Proficiency in Positioning in the Surf Zone Lineup and
in Wave Catching
117
Watkins, A., & Collins, C. (1990). Coaches Manual.
Sydney: Australian Surfriders Association.
Webb, B., & Manton, M. (2002). Dicionário Náutico em
dez línguas. Mem-Martins: Publicações Europa
América.
Werner, D. (1993). Surfer's start up: a beginner's guide to
surfing. San Diego: Ed. Tracks.
Wilson, C. (1994). Surfing Instructors Manual Level 1:
European Surfing Federation.
Young, N. (1983). The History of Surfing. Palm Beach:
Body Press.
Young, N. (1985). Surfing Fundamentals. Palm Beach:
Body Press.
Yu, J. (2006, Fev.). On the instability leading to rip
currents due to wave-current interaction. Journal of
fluid mechanics, 403-428.
APPENDIX
The auxiliary documents, the Questionnaire and all
data charts are available in Technical University of
Lisbon repository, www.repository.utl.pt, from
Brogueira, J., Peixoto, C. (2011). Sistematização do
conhecimento dos sinais relevantes na avaliação do
mar na zona de rebentação de ondas: Proficiência
no posicionamento na zona de surf e na entrada na
onda. Unpublished Master Thesis, Universidade
Técnica de Lisboa [UTL], Faculdade de Motricidade
Humana, Lisboa.
icSPORTS 2015 - International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
118