
 
Linear velocity with t value as much as 2.367 with 
0.035 < 0.05 implies that Ho was rejected. It leads to 
the  conclusion  that  there  is  significant  difference 
between  foot  linear  velocity  between  skill  and 
unskilled on the roundhouse kick. And for the knee 
angular velocity, the observed value is -0.724  with 
0.483 > 0.05 means that ho was accepted. it means 
that there is no significant difference between knee 
angular velocity from skill and unskilled. And for the 
Impulse,  the observed value  is  2.809  with 0.016  > 
0.05 means that ho was rejected. it means that there is 
no  significant  difference  between  knee  angular 
velocity from skill and unskilled. 
4  DISCUSSION 
The  total  score  from  each  group  shows  the 
differences.  Skill  group  has  the  average  11.39  m/s 
foot linear velocity which is bigger than the unskilled  
(Nusufi,  2015).  According  to  Imam  Hidayat  (2003) 
“velocity has quantity” In view of analysis and video 
results, samples that have linear rear leg speed, then 
the impact on sandsack will be greater. Like the speed 
of the car with 90 km/h of speed and the speed of 20 
km/hour  will  have  different  impact  when  hitting  a 
tree. 
Skill  has  knee  angular  velocity  of  904.32  rad/s 
which is lower than unskilled with 985.16 rad/s knee 
angular  velocity.  At  the  time  it  was  analyzed  the 
average  skill  had  a  smaller  knee  angular  value 
compared to unskilled, but in the sandsack kick result 
was  greater  than  the  unskilled  beyond  the  factor  of 
having  large  leg  muscle  power,  because  when  the 
impact skill at  the  time  of the  follow-up  movement 
gave more impetus against sandsack (Srensen, 1996; 
Medrano  and  Smith,  2003;  Bonnefoy,  2008;  Faria, 
2013; Coventry, 2015). 
Then,  for  an  average  skill  having  an  impulse  of 
631.27  N.s  greater  than  unskilled  has  an  average 
impulse  of  311.75  N.s.  At  the  time  of  analysis,  it 
turns out that skill has a greater force than unskilled, 
because  the impulse  is related  to  the  force  given  to 
other objects and time. The larger the force is given 
and the less time that works on the force the greater 
the impulse is. 
5  CONCLUSIONS 
The key of the effective roundhouse kick was that all 
part of body spin, it will result in more impacts.  Then 
at the time of the kick, the angular velocity produced 
is small because it performs the force at the time of 
the kick, not the kick it is swung.  From other factors 
such  as  having  a  great  power,  such  is  needed  to 
support the progress of training. When someone starts 
the exercise from the beginning, this is the factor we 
should teach first. So there will be no mistakes when 
practicing a roundhouse kick. 
REFERENCES 
Afiana, 2013. Kontribusi Panjang, Kelentukan Dan Daya 
Ledak Otot Tungkai Terhadap Tendangan Sabit Pencak 
silat. 
Ball, K. A., 2011. Cinematic comparison of the preferred 
and  non-preferred  foot  punt  kick.  Journal  of  Sports 
Sciences.  29(14),  pp.  1545–1552.  doi: 
10.1080/02640414.2011.605163. 
Bonnefoy, A., 2008. Analysis of the angular velocity during 
the  propulsive  phase  of  the  sprint  start.  Computer 
Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. 
11(sup001),  pp.  39–40.  doi: 
10.1080/10255840802296822. 
Cheraghi, M., 2014. Cinematics of Straight Right Punch in 
Boxing. Annals of Applied Sport Science. 2(2), pp. 39–
50. 
Coventry,  E.,  2015.  Cinematic  effects  of  a  short-term 
fatigue protocol on punt-kicking performance. Journal 
of  Sports  Sciences.  33(15),  pp.  1596–1605.  doi: 
10.1080/02640414.2014.1003582. 
Faria,  F.,  2013.  Knee  angular  displacement  analysis  in 
amateur  ballet  dancers:  A  pilot  study.  European 
Journal  of  Physiotherapy.  15(4),  pp.  215–220.  doi: 
10.3109/21679169.2013.840859. 
Fraenkel, Jack, R., Norman, W., 2012. How to Design and 
Evaluate Research in Education, 8th Edition. Available 
at: (www.mhhe.com). 
Hölbling, D., 2017. Cinematic analysis of the double side 
kick  in  pointfighting,  kickboxing.  Journal  of  Sports 
Sciences.  35(4),  pp.  317–324.  doi: 
10.1080/02640414.2016.1164333. 
Imam,  H.,  2013.  Biomekanika  Pendekatan  Sistem 
Pembelajaran  Gerak,  Program  Pascasarjana 
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung. 
Lubis,  J.,  2004.  Intrumen  Panduan  Bakat  Pencak  silat, 
Direktorat Olahraga Pelajar dan Mahasiswa. Jakarta. 
Medrano, D., Smith, D., 2003. A Comparison of Knee Joint 
Laxity  among  Male  and  Female  Collegiate  Soccer 
Players and Non-Athletes. Sports Biomechanics. 2(2), 
203–212. doi: 10.1080/14763140308522818. 
Nugraha,  E.  B.,  2014  Analisis  Kecepatan  Tendangan 
Pencak  silat  Pada  Pesilat  Unit  Kegiatan  Mahasiswa. 
Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pendidikan. pp. 544–553. 
Nusufi,  M.,  2015.  Hubungan  Kelentukan  Dengan 
Kemampuan  Kecepatan  Tendangan  Sabit  Pada  Atlet 
Pencak silat Binaan Dispora Aceh (PPLP Dan Diklat) 
Tahun 2015. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan. 14(1), pp. 35–
46. 
Pozo,  J.,  Bastien,  G.,  Dierick,  F.,  2011.  Execution  time, 
kinetics,  and  Cinematics  of  the  mae-geri  kick: 
Roundhouse Kick Cinematic Analysis - The Comparison between Skill and Unskill in Pencak Silat
205