Towards Open Source Medical Devices
Current Situation, Inspiring Advances and Challenges
Arti Ahluwalia
1
, Carmelo De Maria
1
, Andrés Díaz Lantada
2
, Licia Di Pietro
1
, Alice Ravizza
1
,
Mannan Mridha
3
, June Madete
4
, Philippa Ngaju Makobore
5
, Alvo Aabloo
6
,
Risto Kitsing
7
and Arni Leivobits
7
1
University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
2
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
3
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden
4
Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
5
Uganda Industrial Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda
6
Tartu Ulikool, Tartu, Estonia
7
Agileworks, Tallin, Estonia
Keywords: Open Source Medical Devices, Collaborative Design, Biomedical Engineering, Regulatory Harmonization.
Abstract: Open Source Medical Devices may be part of the solution towards the democratization of medical
technologies pursuing Universal Health Coverage as part of the Sustainable Development Goals for United
Nations. Recent technological advances, especially in information and communication technologies,
combined with innovative collaborative design methodologies and manufacturing techniques allow for the
mass-personalization of biodevices and help to optimize the related development times and costs, while
keeping safety in the foreground through the whole life cycle of medical products. These advantages can be
further promoted by adequately fostering collaboration, communication, high value information exchange,
and sustainable partnerships and by extending the employment of open source strategies. To this end, within
the UBORA project, we are developing a framework for training the biomedical engineers of the future in
open-source collaborative design strategies and for supporting the sharing of information and the assessment
of safety and efficacy in novel biodevices. An essential part of this open-source collaborative framework is
the UBORA e-infrastructure, which is presented in this study, together with some initial success cases. Main
future challenges, connected with regulatory harmonization, with educational issues and with accessible and
open design and manufacturing resources, among others, are also presented and discussed.
1 INTRODUCTION
Universal Health Care (UHC) is still a dream, even
if all United Nations Member States have agreed to
pursue the achievement of universal health coverage
by 2030 (UN General Assembly, 2012), as part of
the Sustainable Development Goals. Currently,
around 60 countries offer health care to all their
citizens, but vast regions of North and South
America, Africa and Asia, accounting for more than
the 80% of the World’s population, still live without
the desired coverage. In the case of Africa, the
scarcity of quality healthcare is linked, not only to
the lack of resources, but also to the shortage of
adequately trained biomedical engineers.
Capacity building in this sector is needed for
progress and for the establishment of a sustainable
healthcare system. Excluding South Africa, apart
from a few singular initiatives (i.e. in Nigeria and
Ghana), no university in sub-Saharan Africa offers a
complete Biomedical Engineering (BME) graduate
& post-graduate programme (Nkuma-Udah and
Mazi, 2007). Considering that Africa has one of the
youngest demographics, targeting students may be a
key to rapidly and efficiently promote healthcare
improvements. One way of reaching this goal is to
Ahluwalia, A., Maria, C., Lantada, A., Pietro, L., Ravizza, A., Mridha, M., Madete, J., Makobore, P., Aabloo, A., Kitsing, R. and Leibovits, A.
Towards Open Source Medical Devices - Current Situation, Inspiring Advances and Challenges.
DOI: 10.5220/0006586501410149
In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2018) - Volume 1: BIODEVICES, pages 141-149
ISBN: 978-989-758-277-6
Copyright © 2018 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
141
use the immediacy and high information content
offered by the internet combined with the open
source approach to teach design and fabrication of
biomedical devices at university level, hence
focusing on the biomedical engineers of the future.
Creating open source medical devices (OSMD)
means developing these devices by sharing ideas and
concepts, design files, documentation, source-code,
blueprints and prototypes, testing results and all
collected data, with other professional medical
device designers. These interactions should benefit
the whole life cycle of the devices or products under
development and, in the context of BME, there is a
need for a high level of supervision, to control the
final quality and to guarantee the respect to
standards and regulations, hence promoting the final
safety of OSMD (De Maria et al., 2015).
Therefore, the core curriculum for biomedical
engineering should also include courses on
biomedical device regulations and standards and
focus on the promotion of collaborative design
strategies and on the potentials and challenges of
OSMD, as we discuss further on. This approach may
prove beneficial, not only in developing countries,
but also in countries, in which UHC is already
implemented. Taking account of the current situation
of our World, in which new healthcare challenges
are appearing due to shifting demographics and
changing lifestyles, new strategies are needed.
In fact, the relevance of OSMD has been already
put forward by inspiring projects and achieved very
interesting results showing their transformative
potentials. Among these influential proposals, we
can cite the 3D printed hand prostheses developed in
a personalized way (and for free) by the e-NABLE
Community, the sharing of good practices within the
Patient Innovation forum (Oliveira et al., 2017),
pioneering projects for promoting open-source
bioengineering (De Maria et al., 2014; 2015,
Ravizza et al., 2017) and educational experiences
searching for more democratic paradigms, as
summarized previously (Díaz Lantada, 2016).
However, additional and systematic efforts are
needed for achieving global impacts and for making
OSMD a key turning point for the future of a more
socially oriented medical industry. In the following
sections we describe the concept and approach of the
UBORA project and some recent advances achieved
during its preparation and along its first year of
endeavor.
Fundamental issues including: i) the promotion
of collaborative biomedical design methodologies
oriented to global health concerns, ii) the
development of open-access e-infrastructures for
global action, iii) Education for all approaches, iv)
harmonization of medical regulations and v)
international partnerships are part of the strategy
deployed within UBORA. Preliminary success
stories and current challenges are analyzed.
2 CONCEPT AND APPROACH OF
THE UBORA PROJECT
To encourage the shift towards OSMD and the
democratization of medical technology, the EU
funded UBORA:Euro-African Open Biomedical
Engineering e-Platform for Innovation through
Education”project (H2020 research and innovation
programme GA 731053) aims at implementing an e-
infrastructure, UBORA, for open source co-design
of new solutions to face the current and future
healthcare challenges of Europe and Africa.
UBORA (“excellence” in Swahili) brings together
European and African universities and their
technological hubs (supporting biomedical design
and prototyping laboratories and incubators) to
develop and establish a new methodology for
designing biomedical devices in a collaborative and
open source way.
The UBORA e-infrastructure is aimed at taking
engineers and engineering students through a
process of needs identification, device classification
and regulation, computer-aided modeling, rapid
prototyping and final preparation of production, in
which each stage is vetted and monitored by experts
to ensure that safety criteria are met during the
design process.
Throughout the project, we are exploiting and
reinforcing networking, disseminating knowledge on
rapid prototyping of new ideas and sharing
information about the performance and the gathered
quality data, in order to maximize innovation and
minimize waste along the life cycle of the
biodevices being collaboratively developed, which
are also providing open-access content to the
UBORA e-infrastructure. The UBORA project is
supported by policymakers and stakeholders
covering the whole life cycle of biomedical product
development, as well as propelled by a series of
design schools and design competitions connected
with the aforementioned formative efforts.
The UBORA design schools are inspired by the
pioneering UNECA (United Nations Economic
Commission for Africa) funded Innovator Summer
Schools (ISS). Since 2013 the themes of these ISS
have focused on the co-development of biomedical
BIODEVICES 2018 - 11th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
142
devices based on local needs and materials. Table 1
lists the Summer Schools held so far on different
topics related to Biomedical Engineering.
Thanks to UNECA the ISS bring together a
community of African universities committed to
developing a joint and well balanced curriculum in
Biomedical Engineering and to achieving reliable
results in this field from an academic point of view.
Underlying this ambition is the awareness that
quality healthcare is the key to well-being and
importantly helps to promote wealth as well. With
UNECA’s support, 13 universities in Africa have
joined to form “ABEC” the African Biomedical
Engineering Consortium. UBORA was born out of
these initiatives, and seeks to extend the ISS through
the creation of an OSMD co-creation platform: the
mentioned UBORA e-infrastructure. The results
from its first implementation and cases of success
are detailed in the next section.
Table 1: ISS (Innovator Summer Schools) held since
2013. All ISS were funded by UNECA.
Innovator
Summer
School
Hosting
Institution
Period
Topic
Nairobi, Kenya
Kenyatta
University,
2013
August
12
th
- 16
th
Introduction to
BME regulations
and rapid
prototyping
Dar Es Salaam,
Tanzania
Muhimbili
University of
Health and
Allied Science
2014
December
8
th
- 12
th
From making to
marketing
Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia
Addis Ababa
Institute
of Technology
2016
January
11
th
- 15
th
Application of
mobile phones in
healthcare
product
development
Cairo, Egypt
Cairo
University
2017
January
23
rd
-27
th
Biomedical and
clinical data and
informatics for
development in
Africa
3 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
UBORA e-INFRASTRUCTURE
The UBORA e-infrastructure, developed for the
collaborative design of open-source medical devices,
is the key tool for making our project’s data
available, promoting impacts and helping to support
OSMD. Once completely ready, the platform will
incorporate developed projects, publications,
teaching materials and will be made open to the
public for being used as reference collaborative
design resource in the biomedical industry.
At present, a first preliminary version is already
working and is being used by UBORA project’s
partners and by the students taking part in the
UBORA design competitions, whose research and
development results are being also incorporated to
the platform for generating relevant content before
public disclosure. The main features of this online
platform for OSMD are described further on.
3.1 Overall Structure of UBORA
The UBORA e-infrastructure is implemented in a
user-friendly way and clearly oriented to biomedical
engineers and designers, medical professionals,
patients and patients’ associations, medical device
manufacturers and potential collaborators, as main
stakeholders. The access to the e-infrastructure is
obtained after free registration and the homepage
gives the following basic possibilities: i) registration
or entrance for registered users; ii) search for a
medical solution; iii) proposal of ideas or solutions
for relevant medical needs; and iv) consultation of
existing public projects (see Figure 1).
Regarding UBORA as tool for the collaborative
development of medical devices, it is necessary to
highlight that the lifecycle of a medical device has
numerous phases, which go from needs assessment
to the manufacture, sales and disposal. UBORA will
specially focus on and support the first stages of the
process (up to pre-production), which include:
identification of needs, specification, conceptual
design and creativity promotion, geometrical design,
materials selection and virtual and rapid prototyping,
which are the most relevant phases for encouraging
the generation of novel solutions. Conception and
development are channeled following European
biomedical device directives and each step of the
process takes account of European regulations, as a
first step towards global harmonization.
Towards Open Source Medical Devices - Current Situation, Inspiring Advances and Challenges
143
Figure 1: Structure of the UBORA e-infrastructure.
The projects are structured according to the phases of
systematic product development methodologies.
As a collaborative design resource, the UBORA
e-infrastructure has been implemented considering
the mentioned lifecycle of medical devices and the
related relevant steps. Users of this online platform
can create and manage biodevice development
projects, whose relevant information is uploaded,
organized according to the systematic development
phases (see Figure 1) and made accessible to the
users of UBORA.
3.2 Data Management within UBORA
The UBORA e-infrastructure is implemented
following “FAIR” (findable, accessible, inter-
operable and re-usable) data management principles,
according to current recommendations from the EU
and the Horizon 2020 Programme.
Once the UBORA e-infrastructure is loaded with
hundreds of projects, towards the end of the project
by 2019, it will be necessary to count with
adequately implemented search mechanisms for
easily reaching the medical solutions and, hence,
promoting its friendly usability and popularization,
as a tool medical professionals, for medical device
innovators, for policy makers and for patients and
patient associations.
In order to make such data findable, the UBORA
e-infrastructure is designed with interactive tabs,
which help to organize the generated projects and
the uploaded information and data. The projects are
being currently created and organized answering the
following questions:
A) Which clinical area does your solution belong
to?
B) What kind of technology do you propose?
C) Which clinical needs do you address?
Once the fields from previous questions A, B & C
are ordered and numbered, such numbers may be
used as identification coordinates for classifying the
different projects according to the type of medical
device being developed, to the medical area
involved and to the clinical need being addressed. At
present we are also considering the use of the Global
Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) or the
Universal Medical Device Nomenclature System
TM
,
although the use of these privately developed
taxonomies requires the payment of fees, which is
controversial with the open-source and free-
available developments we are pursuing, so
additional reflections are needed.
Considering that UBORA will turn out to be,
using a metaphor, a sort of “collaborative Wikipedia
of medical devices”, the contents uploaded will be
made available to the community, in principle
resorting to different types of Creative Commons
Licenses (https://creativecommons.org). In all cases,
attribution to the designer or to the developing team
has to be granted (CC BY).
We will analyse other possible additions to the
basic mentioned CC BY license, including “share-
alike”, “non-derivatives”, “non-commercial”, among
others, although this may well be a final decision of
the designer or developer, as happens in
collaborative environments for sharing documents
and blueprints such as: Wikimedia Commons,
Thingiverse, Grabcad, among others.
Accessibility to the UBORA e-infrastructure
requires registration, which the users achieve by
introducing basic personal and contact data. Users
accept the terms of usability expressed in the “terms
and conditions” section of the e-infrastructure for
registration. Once registered, users have access to
the projects of innovative medical devices uploaded
to UBORA and to their data and metadata. Search of
desired data is supported by keywords and by the
classifications of clinical areas, medical technologies
and clinical needs previously detailed. Users are
responsible for the veracity of the information
uploaded to UBORA (or modified within UBORA
by them) and the managers of the UBORA e-
infrastructure retain the right to expel users that do
not adequately use the information shared.
Interoperability will be achieved by using
standard file formats and by taking account of the
existing compatibilities among design programmes
and files. A support document for users of the
UBORA is included within the e-infrastructure. It is
important to note that each project within UBORA is
collaboratively developed by a different team of
international designers and collaborators, which will
probably choose among the existing options of
computer-aided design, modeling and manufacturing
software, so the file types used are varied.
It is also necessary to highlight that the final
version of the UBORA e-infrastructure will count on
a group of mentors or managers, i.e. partners from
the UBORA project motivated about the long-term
viability of the e-infrastructure and colleagues with
international impact in bioengineering, who will
advise users of the e-infrastructure about the
preferred file formats for improved interoperation.
BIODEVICES 2018 - 11th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
144
Regarding re-usability of the generated data, the
biodevice development projects validated in the e-
infrastructure by the UBORA mentors or managers
and reviewed as potentially beneficial for solving
global healthcare concerns, once completed, will be
archived in the protected servers of the UBORA e-
infrastructure and will be made available to users
during the whole life of the e-infrastructure or until
the developer, together with the team of mentors and
managers of UBORA, decide to replace it by a better
solution or to eliminate it due to existing alternatives
performing better.
3.3 Ethical Issues and Security
Concerns within UBORA
During the UBORA project’s lifespan (2017-2019),
the medical devices developed rely solely on healthy
volunteers for being tested in vitro and in laboratory
environments, hence being “prototypes for the
assessment of functionality”.
These devices are in most cases consequence of
partners’ dedication to the UBORA project or the
result of students’ developments within the design
competitions and the design schools. No device
potentially harmful for users will be tested in
humans during the project. In any case, ethical
approval from local ethical committees will be
obtained prior to commencing any assessments.
Regarding privacy, it is UBORA’s policy to
respect usersprivacy regarding any information that
the e-infrastructure may collect. Accordingly, the
privacy policy, which affects all data collected and
shared through UBORA e-infrastructure, is outlined
in a clear way in a specific section of the website.
3.4 Some Initial Development Cases
within UBORA
The First UBORA Design Competition counted with
a total of 113 submitted projects, from which 60
were selected for a second round. After the second
round, 40 projects and their teams have been
assessed and chosen as finalists. The best 24 teams
of finalists receive travel and full-board sponsorship
(for one team member) to attend the First UBORA
Design School, to be held in Kenyatta University
(Nairobi, Kenya) from the 11
th
to the 15
th
of
December 2017, whose main topic is the systematic
and collaborative development of innovative
biomedical engineering solutions to reduce child
mortality, which was the topic for the competition.
Among presented projects and solutions we can
cite: biodevices for detecting malaria, coolers for
vaccines, systems for the sterilization of surgical
instruments, incubators for premature babies,
devices for monitoring pregnancy, breast pumps
with cooling and preservation systems, 4D printed
splints (3D printed and then personally modified to
suit patients), polymeric devices for treating
clubfoot, CPAP devices or preventive methods for
malaria, to mention just a few examples. Such
projects are already being incorporated to the
UBORA e-infrastructure, as complete examples.
Towards Open Source Medical Devices - Current Situation, Inspiring Advances and Challenges
145
Figure 2: Open-source solar autoclave. Computer-aided
design of final solution and low-cost prototype. Designed
by: O. Blanco, A. García, L. Martín, L. Jiménez, D. Pérez-
Urruti & P. Isla. Mentors: A. Díaz, J. Jiménez & A. Ros.
It is important to highlight that these examples,
in their current state, are just helping to test the
developed e-infrastructure and to provide cases of
study for teaching-learning tasks, towards active
education paradigms linked to OSMD, which is a
fundamental issue for transforming the medical field
in developing countries. Successful OSMD would
probably be manufactured with alternative methods,
for instance taking benefit of distributed fab-labs
and rapid prototyping techniques nearer to the end
users and searching for personalization.
By means of example, Figure 2 includes the
computer-aided design and the low-cost prototype of
an open-source solar autoclave and Figure 3 includes
the final design of a premature baby incubator with
autonomous temperature regulation and the related
functional prototype.
Figure 3: Open-source premature baby incubator.
Computer-aided design and functional prototype.
Designed by: E. Efer, A. García, C. Hervás, S. Moreno &
A. Tomás. Mentors: A. Díaz, J. Jiménez & A. Ros.
Figure 4 shows the conceptual computer-aided
design of a system for cooling and preservation of
breast milk, based on the thermodynamic of water
evaporation. Inspired by pot-in-pot refrigerators,
students selected appropriate materials and device
size, with the final aim of promoting the use of
breastmilk, as means for reinforcing the immune
system of newborns (WHO, 2016).
Figure 4: Cooling and preservation system for breast milk.
Designed by: S. Maglio and Toncelli Giacomo.
3.5 UBORA Design School Structure
With the aim at providing students with a clear
overview of the whole life cycle of a medical device,
from the conceptual and planning stages, through the
design and implementation, towards the operation
and life, the UBORA design school will provide a
combination of experts’ lessons, cases of study and
Conceived Design Implement Operate(CDIO)
teamwork activities (Crawley et al., 2007).
Lessons will cover aspects such as: introduction
to the medical industry, methodologies for the
development of biodevices, safety issues and
standardization, creativity promotion, conceptual
design, materials selection strategies, advanced
design and manufacturing resources. Inspiring
keynote presentation by outstanding speakers will
present global healthcare issues as well as future
trends in biomedical engineering. Practical
workshops on electronics, software and physical
rapid prototyping, on signal acquisition and data
analysis complete the programme of the school.
4 CURRENT CHALLENGES AND
FUTURE RESEARCH
BIODEVICES 2018 - 11th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
146
The UBORA project is EU funded and developed
among a group of European and African partners
and the already implemented first version of the
UBORA e-infrastructure for OSMD is now open to
the project partners, to colleagues from the ABEC
consortium and to participants from the First
UBORA. However our approach is truly global and
the second release of the e-infrastructure will be
opened to collaborators worldwide along the first
half of 2018. In order to obtain the desired impact
and to enable OSMD to truly make a change for the
better, in the path towards universal health coverage,
there are some current challenges, which still require
additional efforts.
The UBORA e-infrastructure itself may
relevantly contribute to finding satisfactory answers
to these issues, which will in any case require the
support of well-established long-term partnerships,
as detailed in the following subsections.
4.1 Sustainability Issues of OSMD
Open-source and collaborative developments of
biodevices are aimed at reaching every single patient
potentially benefiting from the novel technology,
regardless of their social-economical status.
However successful open-source and freely
available (for the patients) solutions rely also on
their potential of generating wealth, of involving the
local populations for more efficient supply chains
and of sustainably growing, both environmentally
and socioeconomically, while benefiting both the
patients and all stakeholders involved in the lifecycle
of the biodevice. To this end, educators, researchers,
medical professionals, patients and associations,
device manufacturers, policy makers, experts in
regulation, fundraisers, patrons and sponsoring
bodies have to interact (and the UBORA e-
infrastructure constitutes a powerful resource for
such collaboration) and work together for the
sustainability of OSMD.
Regarding these issues, after the project’s life, in
the long-term life of the UBORA e-infrastructure,
UBORA mentors or managers will not be
responsible for the use given to the open-access
online resources of the e-infrastructure and it will be
the responsibility of the potential manufacturers,
taking inspiration on the projects available in the e-
infrastructure, to fulfil pre-market approvals and to
respond to potential failures of the products they
decide to produce and commercialize.
Our model implies manufacturers perceiving the
access to UBORA’s developments as a support to
their reaching more rapidly the users (hence
minimizing their R&D costs by using open-designs
developed following safe design procedures and
supervised by a team of experts) and, subsequently,
wishing to reinvest in the e-infrastructure. We also
pursue that the educational aspects of UBORA will
be understood by institutions and used as massive-
open-online resources, which will also serve to
support the sustainability of the e-infrastructure.
Inspiring cases of success, such as Wikipedia,
Firefox, Linux and other open-source initiatives
from the software industry provide clear examples
about the feasibility of open-source strategies.
Let’s apply similar development principles to the
Biomedical Engineering field.
4.2 Towards Regulatory
Harmonization
Continued and systematic work aimed at the global
harmonization of regulations, which should also take
account of the particular aspects present in
collaboratively developed devices, constitute
additional keys for the success of OSMD. In fact
collaboratively developed projects may well result in
safer devices if the correct design principles are
followed (Ravizza et al., 2017).
Ideally, the standards used by the biomedical
designers during their development processes should
be also generated and shared using collaborative and
open-source strategies, if the impact of OSMD is to
be promoted in a methodic way. Considering the
current costs of accessing standards, unbearable for
many designers worldwide, the designers of richer
countries and multinationals “play with loaded
dice”, and this should be corrected.
4.3 Biomedical Engineering Education
for All
Biomedical Engineering Education for all should be
promoted and access to validated and reliable
teaching-learning resources and materials should be
made widely available. Connection of potential
students to networks of educators with a background
in this field should be also encouraged. We consider
that the UBORA e-infrastructure can again
constitute a relevant tool for sharing educational
resources, as the First UBORA Design School will
demonstrate. All this gathering of genius, hopefully
unaffected by reasons linked to social status, race,
religion, political opinions, sex or sexual orientation,
may prove to be transformative for the Biomedical
Engineering field and its industry.
Towards Open Source Medical Devices - Current Situation, Inspiring Advances and Challenges
147
5 CONCLUSIONS
OSMD may be part of the global solution towards
the democratization of medical technologies,
pursuing Universal Health Coverage, as part of the
Sustainable Development Goals for United Nations.
Recent technological advances, especially in
information and communication technologies,
combined with innovative collaborative design
methodologies and manufacturing techniques allow
for the mass-personalization of biodevices and help
to optimize the related development times and costs,
while keeping safety in the foreground through the
whole life cycle of medical products, as has been
discussed in this study.
Main future challenges, linked to regulatory
harmonization, to educational issues and to
accessible and open design and manufacturing
resources, among others, have been also presented
and analyzed. We propose the use of EU standards,
as they are currently recognized in many African
countries, at least as a starting point towards
commercialization, but harmonization is a key yet
unsolved issue, as mentioned before.
It is important to highlight that the advantages of
OSMD can be further promoted by adequately
fostering collaboration, communication, high value
information exchange, and sustainable partnerships
and by extending the employment of open source
strategies. To this end, within the UBORA project,
we are developing a framework for training the
biomedical engineers of the future in open-source
collaborative design strategies and for supporting the
sharing of information and the assessment of safety
and efficacy in novel biodevices.
An essential part of this open-source and
collaborative design framework is the UBORA e-
infrastructure, which has been also presented in this
study, together with some initial success cases.
In short, the UBORA e-Infrastructure is a new
and powerful tool for biomedical engineers to drive
medical innovation forward, in the quest to a better
world with Universal Health Coverage, where access
to the most advanced medical technologies may not
just be for the privileged few. With this UBORA e-
infrastructure the worldwide biomedical community
can generate and share data and blueprints of
biomedical devices, accompanied by the required
procedures for respecting quality assurance, and
assess performance and safety. When properly
implemented, and guaranteed by authorized
competent authorities, these biomedical devices may
safely be used in hospitals and on patients
throughout the World.
Being the UBORA project focused on the
establishment of international partnerships, we
welcome all comments and support. Please contact
us or visit: http://ubora-biomedical.org for updated
information about progress on OSMD.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The UBORA Euro-African Open Biomedical
Engineering e-Platform for Innovation through
Education” project has received funding from the
European Union’s “Horizon 2020” research and
innovation programme under grant agreement No
731053.
The authors thank UNECA for their continued
support and Pehr Wessmark for designing the logo
of UBORA:
REFERENCES
De Maria, C., Mazzei, D., Ahluwalia, A., 2014. Open
source biomedical engineering for sustainability in
African healthcare: Combining academic excellence
with innovation. ICDS 2014, The Eight International
Conference on Digital Society, 45-53.
De Maria, C., Mazzei, D., Ahluwalia, A., 2015. Improving
African Healthcare through Open Source Biomedical
Engineering. International Journal on Advances in
Life Sciences, 7(1 & 2), 10-19.
Díaz Lantada, A., 2016. Engineering Education for all:
Strategies and challenges. International Journal of
Engineering Education, 32-B, 2255-2271.
e-NABLE Community.- “Enabling the future: A
passionate network of volunteers using 3D printing to
give the World a helping hand:
http://enablingthefuture.org (last access: August
2017).
Nkuma-Udah K.I., Mazi E.A., 2007. Developing
Biomedical Engineering in Africa: A case for Nigeria.
Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical
Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 3828-3831,
Springer.
BIODEVICES 2018 - 11th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices
148
Oliveira, P. et al. Patient Innovation: Sharing solutions,
improving life: https://patient-innovation.com (last
access: August 2017).
Ravizza, A., Ahluwalia, A., De Maria, C., Di Pietro, L.,
Ferreti, J., Díaz Lantada, A., Mridha, M., Njagu
Makobore, P., Madete, J., Aabloo, A., Leibovits, A.,
2017. Collaborative open design for safer biomedical
devices. Third World Health Organization (WHO)
Global Forum on Medical Devices, Geneva,
Switzerland.
United Nations General Assembly, 2012. Global health
and foreign policy, General Assembly Resolution
A/67/81, on 12
th
December 2012.
World Health Organization, 2016. MCEE-WHO methods
and data sources for child causes of death 2000-2015.
1-23.
Towards Open Source Medical Devices - Current Situation, Inspiring Advances and Challenges
149