Optimization of Nozzle Shape of Hydrogen-Oxygen Rocket Engine
Valeriy Matveev, Vasilii Zubanov, Leonid Shabliy and Anastasia Korneeva
Department of Aircraft Engine Theory, Samara National Research University, Samara, Russian Federation
Keywords: Parametric Optimization, Rocket Engine, Combustion, Hydrogen, Oxygen, CFD-Simulation.
Abstract: The article presents a technique of parametric optimization of nozzle supercritical part of liquid-propellant
rocket engine. Main approaches for parametric optimization were given. Two optimizers were mentioned.
Thrust and specific impulse were chosen as optimization criteria. Simulation of chamber process was
performed in ANSYS CFX with combustion model Eddy Dissipation. Two variants of combustion were
considered: one global reaction and detailed chemical system with 8 components and 18 reactions.
Comparison of results gives more smooth contours of parameters for set with detailed system against variant
with one reaction for simulation of liquid-propellant rocket engine working with “hydrogen-oxygen”
propellants. In result of optimization the nozzle length was shortened up to 15% virtually without thrust loss
(0.18% reduction in thrust). Also the Pareto set in axis “thrust”-“nozzle length” was obtained.
1 INTRODUCTION
Chamber of liquid-propellant rocket engine (LPRE)
is the main unit of LPRE, in which fuel components
or burner gases create engine thrust during chemical
reactions and efflux from nozzle.
Operating processes of LPRE chamber
accompanied by energy losses. As is known, the
increase of thrust, specific impulse and other
operational parameters (Dobrovol'skij, 2005) of
modern LPRE is an actual problem of aerospace
engineering. At the same time, the cost of
experimental development of LPRE is significantly
higher than the estimated optimization studies, which
allows to create the LPRE with the best parameters at
the design stage, and it reduces the creation time and
the final product cost.
The technology of virtual computer simulation
allows solving optimization tasks using methods
based on multiple virtual simulations (Zubrilin, 2015;
Baturin, 2015) appeared relatively recently.
This paper presents the technique for optimizing
the shape of the expanding part of a LPRE nozzle
using virtual gas-dynamic modeling in ANSYS CFX
(Zubanov, 2015). The engine has a thrust of 100 kN,
and it designed for the interorbital transport vehicle
(Belousov, 2014).
2 THE MAIN APPROACHES FOR
OPTIMIZATION
The traditional approach to solving any optimization
problem is the general mathematical approach, where
the optimized value (for example, the LPRE thrust or
the specific impulse) is expressed as a function in an
explicit or implicit form with several the design
variables (geometric dimensions of LPRE elements,
gas-dynamic flow parameters in the chamber,
strength parameters, design constraints, etc.). Then,
the extrema of this function and the corresponding
values of the optimized parameters (Egorychev,
2016) are found using the tools of mathematical
analysis. Unfortunately, the complexity of creating an
adequate optimized function (verified mathematical
model) exceeds the experimental development of the
LPRE. After all, in order to correctly reflect in the
functional form the influence of some constructive
factor, for example, on the magnitude of thrust, it is
necessary to carry out and mathematically generalize
the corresponding experimental study.
The technology of virtual computer modeling
allows solving optimization tasks using methods
based on multiple virtual simulations (Kuzmenko,
2007; Shablii, 2014) appeared relatively recently. The
main feature of this approach is that the functional
dependence of N optimized parameters, optimized by
K criteria, is constructed in (N + K) - dimensional
space solely from data on the values of the criteria
Matveev, V., Zubanov, V., Shabliy, L. and Korneeva, A.
Optimization of Nozzle Shape of Hydrogen-Oxygen Rocket Engine.
DOI: 10.5220/0006890003650370
In Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMULTECH 2018), pages 365-370
ISBN: 978-989-758-323-0
Copyright © 2018 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
365
obtained from virtual models constructed for the
corresponding combinations of parameters in the
region of interest, completely without analyzing the
physical effect of the parameters on the criteria. The
latter is a very important advantage of this approach,
since it allows to treat the virtual model as a "black
box" without analyzing the reasons for the influence
of certain parameters on the criteria. At the same time,
the evaluation of the mutual influence of a parameter
set on the considered criteria is performed
automatically by the optimization algorithm.
Algorithm of modern optimizers, such as ANSYS
Design eXplorer (ANSYS, 2015) and Sigma
Technology IOSO (Kuzmenko, 2007) allow
simultaneous optimization by several criteria,
depending on several hundred parameters (Egorov,
2007).
Figure 1 shows a diagram of the process of
constructing an approximating optimization surface
using as a virtual model the CFD model of the flow
in the chamber of a liquid rocket engine. Similarly,
lower-level models, both higher, up to the full three-
dimensional model of a virtual LPRE, can be applied,
which includes not only CFD modeling of currents in
all engine paths, considering phase transitions and
chemical transformations, but also a FEM-evaluation
of the structural strength of the structure. Similarly,
models of both low and high levels can be applied. As
models of a low level, the mathematical functions of
the traditional approach can be used. As models of a
high level, the full three-dimensional model of a
virtual LPRE including not only workflow CFD-
simulation in all engine paths, considering phase
transitions and chemical transformations, but also the
FEM-evaluation of structural strength can be used.
Also, combined and multilevel models can be used.
For example, modeling of fuel flow through pipelines
is carried out in a one-dimensional setting, the quality
of its spraying by nozzles is estimated by zero-
dimensional criterial dependencies, and modeling of
combustion in the chamber is performed in a three-
dimensional nonstationary setting. Naturally, since
the values obtained from the "black box" cover the
investigated area with a mesh model of finite density,
this approach to optimization contains a
methodological error: the approximating surface in
the general case cannot guarantee the search for a
global extremum under sharp changes in the criterion
(Figure 2). However, as practice shows, the existing
technologies of optimizer programs can reduce the
probability of error (Shabliy, 2014).
3 CFD-SIMULATION OF
COMBUSTION PROCESS IN
LPRE CHAMBER WITH FUEL
COMPONENTS «HYDROGEN
& OXYGEN»
This section presents the methodology of simulation
in ANSYS CFX of combustion process in the
chamber of small thrust rocket engine operating on
gaseous oxygen and hydrogen (Zubanov, 2017).
Chemical kinetics was modeled in two variants: using
a single global reaction (molecular formula) and set
of chemical reactions.
For first calculation, the single reaction in the pre-
processor СFX-Pre was chosen from the library
ANSYS CFX the global combustion reaction
“Hydrogen Oxygen”, which involves three
components: H2, O2, H2O. The reacting mixture of
these three gases, defined based on the selected
reaction was set as a working fluid. The mass flow
rate, the temperature and mass fraction components
were set as the input boundary conditions of
calculation area.
Figure 1: The optimization scheme through multiple virtual
simulations (for example, CFD simulation of a LPRE
chamber).
SIMULTECH 2018 - 8th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications
366
Figure 2: Error estimating the global maximum of the
optimized criterion in the case of insufficient discretization
of the approximation domain.
The applied model of combustion Eddy
Dissipation was developed to describe turbulent
flows of a premixed mixtures. It suggests that
chemical reactions cause the reacting mixture to
equilibrium, i.e. the chemical reaction rate is
much higher than the rate of mixing of fuel and
oxidizer (Matveev, 2014). Using one global reaction
does not allow to fully describe a branched chain
reaction in mixtures of hydrogen with oxygen and
assess the education progress of the reaction
intermediates. A detailed kinetic scheme of
chemical reactions with these components includes
more than 20 elementary reactions with
participation of free radicals in the reacting mixture.
The set of reactions of (Gardiner, 1984),
described in more detail in (Zubanov, 2014) was
used in this study. It consists of 18 chemical
reactions (including reversible 5) with the
participation of 8 components: H
2
, O
2
, H
2
O, H, O,
OH, H
2
O, H
2
O
2
.
Figure 3: The temperature distribution along the length of
the chamber when using: a – single global reaction; b – set
of 18 reactions.
The rate of each reaction is determined by the
Arrhenius equation. The components and products
involved in this reaction, the stoichiometric
coefficients and the reaction order were set manually
for describe each reaction in CFX-Pre. The
parameters of the chemical reaction speed rate
(preexponential multiplier A, temperature exponent
n, activation energy E and activation temperature T
were taken from (Gardiner, 1984),
(Soloviova-Sokolova, 2016) and (Kozlov, 2015).
After reactions specifying all substances was
included in the reacting gas mixture of fluid domain.
Further steps of the modeling did not differ from the
previous simulation using global-reaction. When
modeling complicated systems of reactions, the
instability of the solution was increased that was
required to increase the number of iterations, and
consequently, increased the total solution time in
comparison with using a single global reaction.
Verification of shown above simulation
methodology was performed on the test small thrust
rocket engine (25 N thruster), since there were
experimental data for it. A comparison of the CFD
model results with experimental data showed that
the resulting specific impulse in the void
corresponds to the experimental one with an
accuracy of 3%.
After verification the current LPRE was
simulated. The obtained results (Figures 3 and 4)
show that the simulation with a single reaction
overestimates the local temperature, and the flow is
more uniform, axisymmetric. But the calculation
with a complicated system of reactions gives has
more gradual change in temperature along the length
of the chamber and looks more “physical”.
Figure 4: The Mach number distribution along the length of
the chamber when using: a – single global reaction; b – set
of 18 reactions.
Optimization of Nozzle Shape of Hydrogen-Oxygen Rocket Engine
367
4 DESCRIPTION OF LPRE
CHAMBER PARAMETRIC
MODEL
The rocket engine with a thrust of 100 kN designed
for the interorbital transport vehicle was chosen as the
optimization object, because it should have a large
nozzle to provide the high specific impulse and thrust.
A virtual CFD model of the gas-dynamic flow in
the nozzle was created earlier (Figures 3 and 4). The
thrust, the specific impulse, and the static pressure
distribution on the inner surface were determined for
the given working conditions of the projected nozzle.
The working conditions of the projected nozzle were
the workflow parameters at the inlet, the pressure at
the inlet and outlet. It is noteworthy that the
simulation accuracy was acceptable for a multivariate
optimization study: the calculated thrust by CFD-
modeling of the base nozzle version, constructed
according to the technique (Egorychev, 2016), was
99.14 kN, and the specific impulse was 4323 m/s.
By the technique (Dobrovol'skij, 2005;
Egorychev, 2016) the thrust was 100 kN, and the
specific impulse was 4357 m/s with the combustion
chamber coefficient 0.98.
The expanding part of the nozzle composed of a
circular arcs and a Bezier-splines constructed by three
knots (Figure 5). The expanding part of the nozzle
was parameterized by six parameters with the
following ranges of variation (the basic value and
relative changes are indicated in parentheses):
the length of the expanding nozzle part was
L
a
= 935…1155 (1100
%
%
) mm;
the arc radius after the critical section was
R
c3
= 2…20 (14
%
%
) mm;
the expansion angle of the nozzle in the critical
section was β
m
= 30…70° (50°
%
%
;
the expansion angle of the nozzle in the output
section was β
a
= 5…19° (15°
%
%
;
the distance of the spline control points from its
ends for the critical (cr) section was
spline_cr = 1…99% (basic - 5%);
the distance of the spline control points from its
ends for the output (out) section was
spline_out = 1…99% (basic - 5%).
For optimization, ANSYS Design Exploration
tools were used, namely: the sensitivity of the
parameters (Local Sensitivity), the construction of the
response surface in the second order polynomials
(Response Surface), and the optimization algorithm
for screening geometry variants (Screening
Optimization) (ANSYS, 2015; Shabliy, 2014).
5 OPTIMIZATION RESULTS
A preliminary assessment of the sensitivity of the
parameters showed that parameters βa and βm,
spline_cr and spline_out have the determining
influence on the thrust and momentum, while
parameter La affects to a lesser extent, and the
influence of parameter Rc3 is insignificant
(Figures 6 and 7).
In the first case, optimization was carried out
according to the criteria of maximum thrust and
specific impulse, and it was possible to increase the
thrust by 0.6%, and the specific impulse by 0.2%, and
with the nozzle length La reduced to 1093 mm (base
value of La was 1100 mm). Since the mass of the
engine depends strongly on the length of the nozzle,
it was decided to supplement the optimization task by
the criterion of minimizing La. As a result, the nozzle
was shortened by 15% (up to 936 mm) with a slight
(by 0.18%) reduction in thrust. Changes of the nozzle
shape, corresponding to the first (I) and the second
(II) tasks, are shown in Figure 8. The Pareto set
corresponding to the second task is shown in
Figure 9.
Thus, the technique for optimizing the shape of
the expanding part of a LPRE nozzle by calculation
was created to obtain maximum thrust with the
minimum nozzle length.
Figure 5: Parametrized nozzle model.
Figure 6: The sensitivity diagram for the geometric
parameters and optimizing criteria.
SIMULTECH 2018 - 8th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications
368
Figure 7: The response surface in assessing the effect of β
a
and β
m
on the thrust.
Figure 8: Changes the nozzle shape in comparison with the
basic version ("0").
Figure 9: The Pareto set "Length La - Thrust".
6 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the adequate CFD-model with the set of
reactions, the geometry optimization of the expanding
nozzle part of the rocket engine with the thrust of
100 kN for an interorbital transport vehicle was
carried out. The good solution was found of the set of
pareto: the nozzle was shortened by 15% with a slight
by 0.18% reduction in thrust.
CFD-modeling of the combustion process on
components “hydrogen-oxygen” shows that the gross
reaction results differ from the results obtained with
system of chemical reactions. In General, the EDM
model gives overestimated results on temperature in
comparison with results of thermodynamic
calculation of the chamber. But it can be used to
obtain reference solutions.
The technique for optimizing the shape of the
expanding part of a LPRE nozzle by calculation was
created to obtain maximum thrust with the minimum
nozzle length.
The technique can be used to optimize the nozzle
of a rocket engine for the second, third and
interorbital transport vehicle stages of launch
vehicles. But first of all it is required to obtain an
adequate CFD-model with combustion of a rocket
engine.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work was completed with the financial support
of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia in
the framework of the implementation of the Program
‘‘Research and development on priority directions of
scientific-technological complex of Russia for 2014–
2020” and within the basic part framework of the state
assignment and with Grant Council of the President
of the Russian Federation in the framework of the
SP-3790.2015.1 scholarship.
REFERENCES
Dobrovol'skij M. V. Zhidkostnye raketnye dvigateli.
Osnovy proektirovanija [Liquid propellant rocket
engines. Basics of designing]. Moscow: MSTU Publ.,
2005. 488 p.
Zubrilin, I. A., Dmitriev, D. N., Matveev, S. S., Matveev,
S. G. Numerical investigation of the nonreacting
swirling flow structure downstream of industrial gas
turbine burner with the central body. Paper presented at
the Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, 2015, 4A
doi:10.1115/GT2015-42181.
Baturin, O. V., Popov, G. M., Goryachkin, E. S., Novikova,
Y. D. Application of 3D navier-stokes equations and
mathematical optimization techniques to improve the
efficiency of seven-stage axial compressor. Paper
presented at the SIMULTECH 2015 - 5th International
Conference on Simulation and Modeling
Methodologies, Technologies and Applications,
Proceedings, 227-232.
Vasiliy Zubanov, Vitaliy Egorychev, Leonid Shabliy.
Design of Rocket Engine for Spacecraft Using CFD-
Modeling. Procedia Engineering, 2015, V. 104, P. 29–
35. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.04.093.
Belousov, A. I., Sedel'nikov, A. V. Problems in formation
and control of a required microacceleration level at
spacecraft design, tests, and operation. Russian
Optimization of Nozzle Shape of Hydrogen-Oxygen Rocket Engine
369
Aeronautics, 2014, 57(2), 111-117. doi:10.3103/
S1068799814020019
Egorychev, V. S., Ryazanov, A. I. A method of design
calculation for the two-component jet-jet gas nozzle
with outer mixing. Russian Aeronautics, 2016 59(4),
619–622. doi: 10.3103/S1068799816040280
Kuzmenko M. L., Shmotin Yu. N., Egorov I. N., Fedechkin
K. S. Optimization of the gas turbine engine parts using
methods of numerical simulation. Proceedings of the
ASME Turbo Expo, 2007, Vol. 6, pt. A, pp. 425-431.
DOI: 10.1115/GT2007-28205.
Shablii, L. S., Dmitrieva, I. B. Blade geometry
transformation in optimization problems from the point
cloud to the parametric form Russian Aeronautics
(Allerton Press Incorporation), 2014, 57(3), 276–282.
doi: 10.3103/S1068799814030106
ANSYS Inc. 2015 Workbench. Design Exploration User's
Guide
Egorov I. N., Kretinin G. V., Leshchenko I. A., Kuptzov S.
V. Multi-objective approach for robust design
optimization problems. Inverse Problems in Science
and Engineering, 2007, 15 (1), pp. 47–59.
DOI:10.1080/17415970600573916.
Shabliy L. S. and Cherniaev A. V. Optimization of
Compressor Blade Geometry for Efficiency and
Pressure Ratio Under Strength Constraint. ASME 2014
Gas Turbine India Conference GTINDIA2014-8132,
2014, DOI: 10.1115/GTINDIA2014-8132.
V. M. Zubanov, D. V. Stepanov, L. S. Shabliy. The
technique for Simulation of Transient Combustion
Processes in the Rocket Engine Operating with Gaseous
Fuel "Hydrogen and Oxygen" - IOP Conf. Series:
Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 803 (2017), (JPCS),
Paper No. 012187, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/803/1/
012187
Matveev, S. G., Zubrilin, I. A. Large-eddy simulation of
flow structure after a bluff-body flameholder with
different chemical kinetics mechanisms. Life Science
Journal, 2014, 11(11), 644-649.
Gardiner, W. C. Combustion Chemistry. Springer-Verlag
New York. 1984. 351 p.
Vasiliy Zubanov, Vitaliy Egorychev and Leonid Shabliy.
Hydrogen-Oxygen Rocket Engine Design Using CFD-
Modeling. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2014,
V. 9, Issue 10, Pp. 660-663. DOI: 10.3923/rjasci.2014.
660.663.
Soloviova-Sokolova, J. V., Alekseev, V. A., Matveev, S. S.,
Chechet, I. V., Matveev, S. G., Konnov, A. A. Laminar
burning velocities of benzene + air flames at room and
elevated temperatures. Fuel, 2016, 175, 302-309.
doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.054.
Kozlov, V. E., Chechet, I. V., Matveev, S. G., Titova, N. S.,
Starik, A. M. Modeling study of combustion and
pollutant formation in HCCI engine operating on
hydrogen rich fuel blends. International Journal of
Hydrogen Energy, 2015, doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.
12.078
Shabliy L and Cherniaev A 2014 Optimization of gas
turbine compressor blade parameters for gas-dynamic
efficiency under strength constraints Proceedings of the
4th International Conference on Simulation and
Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and
Applications SIMULTECH 2014 pp 523-528 doi:
10.5220/0004994905230528.
SIMULTECH 2018 - 8th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications
370