The Effects of Visual Merchandising, Layout, Store Facility, Store
Atmosphere on Store Patronage
Andreas Wijaya and Ongky Alex Sander
Bunda Mulia University, Lodan Raya No 2, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Visual Merchandising, Layout. Store Facility, Store Atmosphere, Store Patronage.
Abstract: This study examines the effects of a visual merchandising, layout, store facility, and store atmosphere
effects on store patronage in Transmart Carrefour Cempaka Putih Central Jakarta. Using the purposive
sampling, 85 complete samples were obtained via field questionnaire survey. The research model was tested
using Smart PLS02 and the result of correlation test of store atmosphere variables was 64.98% influenced
by a visual merchandising, layout, and store facilities and the rest of 35.02% were influenced by other
variables not examined in this study. Store patronage variables were influenced by the store atmosphere by
9.60%, while the remaining 90.4% influenced by other variables not examined in this study. The result of
the hypothesis test is H1 accepted, which means that the store atmosphere variable has a significant
influence on the variable of store atmosphere. H2 is rejected, which means layout variables does not have a
significant influence on the store atmosphere. H3 is accepted, which means store facilities variables have a
significant influence on the shop atmosphere. H4 is accepted, which means that the store atmosphere
variables have a significant influence on store patronage.
1 INTRODUCTION
In such a dynamic environment, preserving retail
businesses is important. To maintain their business
activity, retailers had to formulate the strategy to
attract consumer patronage intention to face the
intense competition. Research on patronage
intentions has been an important concern since a
long time ago, recorded by several researchers from
(Donovan, 1982; 1994) (Finn and Louviere, 1996),
(Pan and Zinkhan, 2006), (Teller and Schnedlitz,
2012). They have investigated the antecedent factors
of patronage, product selection and store
atmosphere. Another studied by (Kelley and
Stephenson, 1967), (Stephenson, 1969) in their study
explored the important components of patronage
motives: merchandise and service. According to
(Bitner, 1992); (Yoo, 1998); (Sherman, 1997);
(Baker, 2002) the layout can give a positive
impression to consumers and persuade patronage.
The other factors from a research conducted by Cox
and Brittain (1993); (Danic et al., 2005) observed
that good arrangement display of merchandises can
make consumer easier to see. (Moschis,1992); states
that patronage behaviour involves consumer
motivation for selecting a retail store and motivation
dimensions for shopping patronage a decision-
making process regarding place and product. (Shim
and Kotsiopolus,1992) defines shop patronage as
involving the tendency of the same store selection
over other stores. Consumers will decide to enter the
store through the evaluation of retail format.
Furthermore (Oppawel,2012) states the selection of
patronage through the format of retail and location
was a concern in the desire of consumers to visit.
By looking at the problems that exist above, the
researcher interested to conduct research on
patronage motives especially in a modern market.
According to Nielsen Global Survey (2015), there is
a difference between consumer behavior to choice
format retailing. Developed countries preferred to
shop at a supermarket, where in developed markets,
80% of sales come from large supermarkets,
hypermarkets, and convenience stores. And for
developing countries, people preferred to shop at a
traditional shop.
One of the main topics discussed to investigate
other variables from (Wijaya, 2016): product
assortment, price, and promotion and this research
also aimed to examine the mini theory that has been
done in previous research by (Sander and Wijaya,
2017) about store patronage. The objective of this
Wijaya, A. and Sander, O.
The Effects of Visual Merchandising, Layout, Store Facility, Store Atmosphere on Store Patronage.
DOI: 10.5220/0008490301850190
In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM Untar 2018), pages 185-190
ISBN: 978-989-758-363-6
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
185
research seeks to extend understanding of store
patronage in supercenter format, and sample will be
taken who had been purchased in store in Carrefour
Transmart. Our consideration in choosing Transmart
Carrefour is because it has a different concept
compared to its competitors' retailers, and this
involved the latest format from supermarket to
become supercenter. The new concept in Transmart
Carrefour store also corresponds with the theory of
retail according to (Hollander's, 1966;1981). The
history of retail development seems to demonstrate
an accordion pattern. Domination by general line,
wide-assortment retailers alternates with the
domination by specialized, narrow-line merchants.
But other researchers (Brown,1987) states that the
evolution of retail formats also consider the
consumer behavior such as one-stop shopping on a
wide store that provides a variety of merchandises
alters to a smaller store called specialty stores that
provide specific merchandise for consumer needs.
Currently, Transmart Carrefour presents the latest
concept in the world of retail which is the concept of
one-stop shopping. The latest concept of Transmart
Carrefour is a 4 in 1 concept where supermarkets not
only meet the needs of the community but are
equipped with lifestyle facilities such as theme
parks, mini trans studios, restaurants, cafes, and
cinemas. (www.marketeers.com)
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Store Patronage
Store patronage is defined by several researchers.
Based on perception, image and consumer attitudes
(Burnkrant and Page, 1982) store patronage is
formed by experience, information, and needs.
Consumer patronage intentions are driven by a
combination of purchasing attitudes and normative
beliefs and behavioral motivations. This is also in
line with a research by (Haynes et al., 1994) that
defines patronage as how individuals choose an
outlet to visit rather than other stores, Another
definition of (Manning and Reece, 2004) that reveal
store patronages are a motive or a perception that
affects consumers buying goods in a store that is
facilitated by the seller. Patronage motives are also
one of the reasons consumers choose a store where
retailers should pay attention to merchandise that
will be sold as this is an important factor that affects
consumer purchase outcomes (Damir and Vouk,
2005). Significant factors that affect consumers in
store patronage are the value. Values can change
consumer attitudes and behaviors in terms of
selecting products, brands and retail stores to visit
(Kusnaeny et al., 2013).
2.2 Visual Merchandising
The visual merchandising can be used to beautify
the store view. (Diamond & Diamond, 2003) defined
as the presentation of a store and its merchandise in
ways that will attract the attention of potential
customers and motivate them to make purchases.
(Khan, 2014) Adds attractive visual merchandising
can attract more consumers to visit the store.
Ha1: Visual merchandising has a significant positive
influence on store atmosphere
2.3 Layout
The layout is very prominent in the retail business.
Research (Spies et al., 1997) reveals the layout
should be simple and can provide unexpected
surprises, so the consumers can experience an
impressive shopping experience, and if the design
layout of the front store is poorly, it would give a
negative impression to consumers (Jones, 1999);
(Baker et al., 2002)
Ha2: Layout has a significant positive influence on
store atmosphere
2.4 Store Facilities
Store facilities are services offered by stores to
provide convenience for consumers who shop (Levy
and Weitz, 2014). This is equally in accordance with
the research from (Berman and Evans, 2013),
whereby providing shop facilities can provide a
positive impression for consumers.
Ha3: Store facilities have a significant positive
influence on store atmosphere
2.5 Store Atmosphere
Customer attitude to Store Atmosphere, according to
(Levy and Weitz, 2001), is the design of an
environmental design through visual
communication, lighting, color, music, and smell to
stimulate perceptions and emotions from customers
and ultimately influence their spending behavior.
According to (Berman and Evans, 2013), the
atmosphere of the store is the atmosphere of the
store environment based on physical characteristics
that are typically used to build an impression and
persuade customers. Meanwhile, according to
ICEBM Untar 2018 - International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM) Untar
186
(Lamb, 2001), the atmosphere of the store represents
a whole that is delivered by the physical layout,
decoration and the surrounding environment.
Ha4: Store atmosphere has a significant positive
influence on store patronage
Figure 2.1: Research Framework.
3 METHODOLOGY
A field questionnaire survey was adopted to collect
data of 85 samples using a structured questionnaire
with closed questions and 5-point Likert response
scale. The sampling procedure was taken by
purposive sampling method, a tool for taking
samples with certain criteria. The Criteria of the
selected respondents at least had shopping one time
at Transmart Carrefour Cempaka Putih. The relevant
research used in this study is by (Turley and
Milliman, 2000) in Atmospheric effects on shopping
behaviour: A review of the experimental evidence.
They conclude patronage motives are influenced by
various factors such as location, layout, appearance
and store atmosphere, (Baker et al., 2002) in The
Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on
Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage
Intentions stated shop patronage is influenced by the
arrangement of goods and (Banarjee and Yadav,
2012) in Analysis of visual merchandising: effect on
consumer buying behaviour reveals visual
merchandising can provide patronage intentions and
purchasing impacts.
4 DATA ANALYSIS AND
FINDING
Data had been analysed with SmartPLS02 to
describe outer model test including validity and
reliability test, and inner model involving the
coefficient of determination test and significance of
path coefficients test.
Figure 4.1: Path Model.
4.1 Outer Model
The outer model involves examining individual
indicator reliabilities fo reach construct’s composite
of measures as well as the measures convergent and
discriminant validity.
4.1.1 Validity Test
Validity test in PLS using convergent validity and
discriminant validity.
Convergent Validity Test:
Table 4.1: Convergent Validity Test.
AVE Communality
Visual Merchandising 0,652034 0,652034
Layout 0,721811 0,721811
Store Facility 0,608251 0,608251
Store Atmosphere 0,673110 0,673110
Store patronage 0,938341 0,938341
The convergent validity test evaluation was
carried out by using convergent validity which was
like the used measurement (outer) models. The
amount of loading factor of 0.5 for each variable in
AVE and communality is defined (Ghozali, 2011).
Discriminant Validity Test:
Table 4.2: Discriminant Validity Test.
VM L SF SA PS
VM1
0,854
0,612
0,689
0,655
0,234
VM2
0,885
0,582
0,705
0,638
0,427
VM3
0,666
0,512
0,442
0,397
0,270
L1
0,454
0,796
0,401
0,434
0,196
L2
0,660
0,836
0,615
0,601
0,325
L3
0,645
0,913
0,600
0,582
0,299
The Effects of Visual Merchandising, Layout, Store Facility, Store Atmosphere on Store Patronage
187
Table 4.2: Discriminant Validity Test. (cont.)
VM L SF SA PS
SF1
0,697
0,581
0,796
0,723
0,203
SF2
0,499
0,478
0,748
0,563
0,275
SF3
0,633
0,487
0,828
0,601
0,271
SF4
0,565
0,453
0,745
0,495
0,410
SA1
0,555
0,571
0,652
0,826
0,244
SA2
0,557
0,549
0,502
0,717
0,145
SA3
0,619
0,556
0,641
0,884
0,297
SA4
0,639
0,534
0,708
0,852
0,244
SA5
0,567
0,444
0,662
0,813
0,323
PS1
0,408
0,313
0,358
0,300
0,969
PS2
0,335
0,325
0,335
0,301
0,969
4.1.2 Reliability Test
Table 4.3: Reliability Test.
Cronbach’s Alpha
Composite
Reliability
Visual Merchandising 0,733128 0,847115
Layout 0,808032 0,885828
Store Facility 0,786709 0,861077
Store Atmosphere 0,877297 0,911093
Store patronage 0,934289 0,968190
The reliability test can be extracted from
composite reliability with PLS calculations. The
value of a variable is reliable if the composite
reliability value is > 0.70 and the result of all the
items have been met as a rule of thumb (Ghozali,
2011).
4.2 Inner Model
Evaluation for inner model involving coefficient
determination test and estimating the path
coefficient.
Coefficient Determination Test.
Table 4.4: Coefficient Determination Test.
R Square
Visual Merchandising
Layout
Store Facility
Store Atmosphere 0,649899
Store patronage 0,096059
The results are: Store Atmosphere variables had
been affected by the visuals merchandising as well
as layout and store facilities by 64.98%, the rest of
the 35.02% were from other variables not examined
in this study. Patronage Motive variables were
influenced by the store atmosphere at 9.60%, while
the remaining 90.4% was influenced by other
variables not examined in this study.
Significance of Path Coefficient.
Table 4.5: Significance Of Path Coefficient Test.
T Statistics (|O/STERR|)
Visual Merchandising -> Store
Atmosphere
2,064841
Layout -> Store Atmosphere 1,842815
Store Facility -> Store
Atmosphere
5,066661
Store Atmosphere -> Store
patronage
3,238372
Referring to the results of hypothesis test
researched in this study is H1 is accepted, which
means that the store atmosphere variable has a
significant influence on the variable of Store
Atmosphere. H2 is rejected, which means Layout
variables do not have a significant influence on the
store atmosphere. H3 is accepted, which means
Store Facilities variables have a significant influence
on the shop atmosphere. H4 is accepted, which
means that the store atmosphere variables have a
significant influence on Patronage.
5 CONCLUSIONS
This research aimed to examine the mini theory
from previous research by (Sander and Wijaya,
2017) about store patronage and also aims to
investigate extended variable in store patronage
(Wijaya, 2016). Based on the results, the following
conclusion is taken: the visual merchandising has a
significant effect on store atmosphere, because
consumers feel the existing product arrangement in
Carrefour Transmart Cempaka Putih is already neat
and always available to support the comfortable
shop atmosphere. The layout does not have a
ICEBM Untar 2018 - International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM) Untar
188
significant effect on store atmosphere variables; the
consumers feel the layout that exists in Carrefour
Transmart Cempaka Putih is wide enough, so the
consumer finds it quite difficult to find the product.
Store facility has a significant effect on store
atmosphere variables; the consumers feel the
existing storage facilities in Carrefour Transmart
Cempaka Putih such as air conditioning, toilets,
trolly, and EDC machines make a more convenient
atmosphere for store patronage. Store atmosphere
has a significant effect on store patronage; the
consumers feel the existing storage facilities in
Carrefour Transmart Cempaka Putih such as
lighting, music, scent, cleanliness, and color can
attract shop patronage. We suggested to another
researcher to find other variables in patronage
research such as location, access, and service.
6 DISCUSSION AND
LIMITATION
The result of this research has some limitation. The
sample taken was just 85 samples and was obtained
on weekends. We suggest another researcher to
increase samples and investigate another method of
collecting data in a weekday and weekends to see
consumer buying pattern and patronage motive as
well as adding some additional variables such as
location, promotion, and other situational variables.
Another interesting factor in this research is
technology environment. Many businesses now tried
to promote and advertise on the internet channel. We
suggest for another researcher to find out the
technology area. Such as the relationship from the
ease of technology with interest in store patronage,
whether to increase or decrease interest in store
patronage in terms of showrooming or free-riding
phenomenon.
REFERENCES
Baker, J., A. Parasuraman, D. Grewal, and G.B Voss
(2002). “The Influence of Multiple Store Environment
Cues on Perceived Merhcandise Value and Patronage
Intentions”. Journal of Marketing 66 (2): 120 – 141.
Banarjee, S. Yadav, P. (2012) Analysis of visual
merchandising: effect on consumer buying behaviour,
International Journal of Retailing & Rural Business
Perspectives.
Berman. B. And J.R. Evans, (2013). Retail management:
A strategic Approach (12th edition) Pearson Education
Asia, New Delhi.
Brown, Stephern (1995), Postmoderism, the wheel of
retailing, and will do power. The International Review
of Retail, Distribution, and Consumer Research. July
387-412.
Danic, Ivan Damir dan Rudolf Vouk. 2005. Exploring the
Relationships Between Store Patronage Motives and
Purchasing Outcomes for Major Shopping Trips In
The Croatian Grocery Retailing. Ekonomski Pregled;
56 (9) 634-657.
Diamond, J. And Diamond, E, (2003) “Contemporary
visual merchandising environmental design, 3rd Ed.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Patience Hall.
Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store
atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach.
Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 34-57.
Donovan, R. J., Rossiter, J. R., Marcoolyn, G., & Nesdale,
A. (1994). Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior.
Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 283-294.
Finn, A., & Louviere, J. J. (1996). Shopping center image,
consideration, and choice: Anchor store contribution.
Journal of Business Research, 35(3), 241-251.
Haynes, J.L., A.L, Pipkin, W.C. Black, and R.M. Cloud
(1994). “Application of a Choice Sets Model to Assess
Patronage Decision Styles og High Involvement
Consumers: Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
12:23-32.
Hollander, Stanley C., (1960), The Wheel of Retailing,
Journal of Marketing. July, pp 37-42.
Jones, M.A. (1999). “Entertaining Shopping Experiences:
An Exploratory Investigation”. Journal of Retailing
and Consumer Services 6: 129-139.
Khan, Humayun. (2014). Visual Merchandising 101: How
to Create Store Designs with High-Converting
Displays.
Kusnaeny; Achmad Sudiro; Djumilah Hadiwidjojo and
Fatchur Rohman. 2013. Patronage Buying Motives of
Coffee shop’s Consumers. IOSR Journal of Business
and Management: Volume 8, Issue 3.
Levy, M. And B. Weitz (2014). Retailing Management
(9th Edition) Tata Mc. Graw Hill, Irwin.
Moschis, G.P. (1992). Marketing to Older Consumer: a
Handbook of Indormation for Strategy Development.
Quorom Books. Wstport, Connecticut.
Oppawel H, (2005): More choice is better: Effect
assortment size dan composition on assortment
evaluation, International Journal of Marketing, Oct:
45-60.
Pan, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Determinants of retail
patronage: A meta-analytical perspective. Journal of
Retailing, 82(3), 229-243.
Sherman,E.,A. Mathur and R.B. Smith (1997). “Store
Environment and Consumer Purchase Behaviour:
Mediating Role of Consumer Emotions”. Psychology
and Marketing 14 (4): 361- 379.
Shim, S. & A. Kotsiopulos. (1992). “Patronage Behaviour
of Apparel Shopping: Part II”. Testing a Patronage
Model of Consumer Behaviour. Clothing and Textiles
Research Journal 10 (2):58.
Stephenson, R. P., (1969): Identifying Determinants of
Retail Patronage, Journal of Marketing, July: 57-61.
The Effects of Visual Merchandising, Layout, Store Facility, Store Atmosphere on Store Patronage
189
Spies,K.,F. Hesse, and K. Loesch. (1997). “Store
Atmosphere, Mood and Purchasing Behaviour”.
International Journal of Research in Marketing 14:1-
17
Teller, C., & Schnedlitz, P. (2012). Drivers of
agglomeration effects in retailing: The shopping mall
tenant's perspective. Journal of Marketing
Management, 28(9-10), 10431061.
Turley, L. W., & Milliman, R. E. (2000). Atmospheric
effects on shopping behavior: A review of the
experimental evidence. Journal of Business Research,
49(2), 193-211
Wijaya (2016) The Influence store atmosphere to
repurchase intention towards consumer emotion and
purchase decision, International Research Confrence
on Management and Business.. http://ircmb.org/
galerry/proceedings-2016/
Yoo, C., J. Park and D.J Maclnnis. (1998). “Effects of
Store Characteristics and In-store Emotional
Experiences on Store Attitude”. Journal of Business
Research 42 (3): 253-263.
ICEBM Untar 2018 - International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM) Untar
190