loading
Documents

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Anthony Bouillod 1 ; Antony Costes 2 ; Georges Soto-Romero 3 ; Emmanuel Brunet 4 and Frédéric Grappe 5

Affiliations: 1 C3S Health - Sport Department, French Cycling Federation and LAAS-CNRS, France ; 2 UPS and PRISSMH, France ; 3 LAAS-CNRS and ISIFC Génie Biomédical, France ; 4 French Cycling Federation, France ; 5 C3S Health - Sport Department and Professional Cycling Team FDJ, France

ISBN: 978-989-758-205-9

Keyword(s): Bike Fitting, 3D Kinematics, Comparison, Laboratory, Cycling.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Computer Systems in Sports ; Health, Sports Performance and Support Technology ; Sport Science Research and Technology ; Sport Statistics and Analyses ; Training and Testing

Abstract: The present work aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the 3D motion analyzer (Shimano Dynamics Lab, Sittard, Netherland) during laboratory cycling tests in comparison with the Vicon device (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd. Oxford, UK). Three cyclists were required to complete one laboratory cycling test at three different pedalling cadence and at a constant power output. Kinematic measurements were collected simultaneously from 3D motion analyzer and Vicon devices and performed five times for each pedalling cadence. The two systems showed a high reliability with excellent intraclass correlation coefficients for most kinematic variables. Moreover, this system was considered as valid by considering the error due to the initial markers placement. Experts and scientists should use the Vicon system for the purpose of research whereas the 3D motion analyzer could be used for bike fitting.

PDF ImageFull Text

Download
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 18.206.15.215

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Bouillod, A.; Costes, A.; Soto-Romero, G.; Brunet, E. and Grappe, F. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the 3D Motion Analyzer in Comparison with the Vicon Device for Biomechanical Pedalling Analysis.In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS, ISBN 978-989-758-205-9, pages 63-66. DOI: 10.5220/0006088200630066

@conference{icsports16,
author={Anthony Bouillod. and Antony Costes. and Georges Soto{-}Romero. and Emmanuel Brunet. and Frédéric Grappe.},
title={Validity and Reliability of the 3D Motion Analyzer in Comparison with the Vicon Device for Biomechanical Pedalling Analysis},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,},
year={2016},
pages={63-66},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006088200630066},
isbn={978-989-758-205-9},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,
TI - Validity and Reliability of the 3D Motion Analyzer in Comparison with the Vicon Device for Biomechanical Pedalling Analysis
SN - 978-989-758-205-9
AU - Bouillod, A.
AU - Costes, A.
AU - Soto-Romero, G.
AU - Brunet, E.
AU - Grappe, F.
PY - 2016
SP - 63
EP - 66
DO - 10.5220/0006088200630066

Login or register to post comments.

Comments on this Paper: Be the first to review this paper.