![](bg6.png)
innovation and change and, thereby, to anticipate the
likely success or failure of the introduction of new
technologies is an important objective. One
eventually might avoid costly failures early in the
adoption curve that would be due less to flawed
characteristics of the innovation and more to the
inflexibility and rigidness of the potential
appropriators, since intellectual curiosity and
receptivity to new experiences increasingly appear
to play a considerable role in the observed adoption
or rejection of new information technologies and
management systems.
Jackson, D. N., 1976. Jackson Personality Inventory
manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.
Kanter, R., 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom:
Structural, collective and social conditions for
innovation in organizations. Research in
Organizational Behavior,
10, 169-211.
Kock, N., 2000. Benefits for virtual organizations from
distributed groups. Communications of the ACM, 43,
107-112.
McCartt, A. T., & Rohrbaugh, J., 1995. Managerial
openness to change and the introduction of GDSS:
Explaining initial success and failure in decision
conferencing. Organization Science, 6, 569-584.
McCrae, R. R., 1987. Creativity, divergent thinking, and
openness to experience. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.
5 REFERENCES
Ocker, R., Hiltz, S. R., Turoff, M., and Fjermestad, J.,
1995. The effects of distributed group support and
process structuring on software requirements of
development teams: Results on creativity and quality.
Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 127-
153.
Adorno, T. W., Frankel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., &
Sanford, R. N., 1950. The authoritarian personality.
New York: Harper.
Applegate, L. M., 1991. Technology support for
cooperative work: A framework for studying
introduction and assimilation in organizations.
Journal of Organizational Computing, 1, 11-39.
Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D., 2001. Adaptiveness in vitural
teams: Organizational challenges and research
directions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 27-
46.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K., 1991. The Big Five
personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-
analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Rangarajan, N., and Rohrbaugh, J., 2003. Multiple roles
of online facilitation: An example in any-time, any-
place meetings. Group Facilitation: A Research and
Applications Journal, 5, 26-36.
Beise, C. M., Niederman, F., and Beranek, P. M., 1999.
Group facilitation in a networked world. Group
Facilitation, 1, 33-44.
Digman, J. M., 1990. Personality structure: Emergence
of the five-factor model. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L.
W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.
41. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Rogers, E. M., 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New
York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M., with Shoemaker, F. F., 1971.
Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural
approach. New York: The Free Press.
Fjermestad, S., & Hiltz, R. S., 2001. Group support
systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field
studies. Journal of Management Information Systems,
17, 115-160.
Salgado, J. F., 1997. The five factor model of personality
and job performance in the European Community.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
Furst, S., Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B., 1999. Virtual team
effectiveness: A proposed research agenda.
Information Systems Journal, 9, 249-269.
Shirani, A., Tafti, M., & Affisco, J., 1999. Task
technology fit: A comparison of two technologies for
synchronous and asynchronous group communication.
Information and Management, 36, 139-150.
Goldberg, L. R., 1993. The structure of phenotypic
personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R., 1997.
Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An
exploratory study of a web-based conference system.
Decision Sciences, 28, 975-996.
Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B., & Mantei, M., 1995.
Work relationships and media use: A social network
analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 193-
211.
Hinds, P., & Kiesler, S., 1995. Communication across
boundaries: Work, structure, and use of
communication technologies in a large organization.
Organization Science, 6, 373-393.
Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J.
D., & McCloy, R. A., 1990. Criterion-related
validities of personality constructs and the effect of
response distortion on those validities. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
ICEIS 2004 - HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION
120