
5 Summary of Outcomes
The TeleCARE socio-organisational assessment has been carried out in the UK and it
must be understood that the outcome of the assessment can not be considered
representative of a situation in other countries and regions around the European
Union. However, if run in other countries and regions, similarities are probably
likely. To run this assessment in the wider European context would require more time
and resources than were available to the TeleCARE consortium for this purpose,
during the course of this project.
In considering the outcome of this assessment, and before conclusions are drawn
and recommendations made, the following important points must be kept in mind:
The elderly care sector in the UK is a sensitive one. There have been many high
profile cases reported by the press underlining the weaknesses in the current
system of care provision.
With costs of care provision increasing, and the current trend towards
encouraging “Care in the Community”, in the past couple of years, many care
homes have either had to close, or switch to caring for people with disabilities.
The respondents to the socio-organisational assessment, care providers, elderly
people and their relatives, as a group, are relatively technology averse, when
compared to other sectors in society.
The respondents to the socio-organisational assessment, have assessed the
impact of the TeleCARE technology without having actually experienced it first
hand.
The elderly care sector is an area of great sensitivity. The elderly, as a sector in
society, are all too often overlooked when developing both public and private
investment strategies for the future. This is not too say that investment provisions
have not been, or are not being made, but rather, levels of investment are not adequate
given the demographic trends.
If we assume that the sample of care providers, elderly and their relatives, who
contributed to the TeleCARE socio-organisational assessment is representative of the
care providing sector as a whole, then the following conclusions can be drawn.
Although the use of personal computers in managing day to day business is
prevalent with penetration rates exceeding 70%, the idea of using network
technologies such as the Internet to support care provision, is not.
The suggestion that advances in network technologies can improve care
provision is one with which the care provider views with suspicion. In this
sector, as is the case with many others, the introduction of new technologies is
considered as an attempt to reduce costs by reducing the number of care
providers required.
The uptake of new technologies will require new approaches to elderly care.
Care providers will need to re-train since the skills required will change.
Whilst it may be beneficial to encourage an independent lifestyle amongst
elderly people, we may run the risk of further isolating the elderly person within
the community.
The TeleCARE proposition would only prove appropriate amongst elderly
people who enjoy good health and can live independently already. Elderly who
140