data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b9ac/2b9ac03751a59a1b21ea0eeb4f371c8fe8ca2998" alt=""
selected for this test seem not to be the best choice to really reduce the rotation con-
fusion problem. We are trying another clusters in order to have more differenciated
Fourier-Mellin features.
6 Conclusion
We have proposed a new methodology to absorb image rotations in a neural network
without extracting invariant characteristics. This method is based on a dynamic neural
network topology, and gives encouraging results when applied on multi-oriented and
multi-scaled images. Compared to rotation invariant feature extraction, this approach
proved its interest, showing that graphical information can perform better than features
extraction.
Our aim is to propose in a future work a decisional process, that will be able to de-
cide of the dynamic link modification. Another work concerns the polar transformation:
the best version induces a more complicated dynamic topology process, that we have
to implement; some tests show that this new version could improve recognition from
about 5%.
References
1. Adam, S., Ogier, J.M., Cariou, C. Mullot, R., Gardes, J., Lecourtier, Y.: Fourier-mellin based
invariants for the recognition of multi-oriented and multi-scaled shapes : application to engi-
neering drawings analysis. Machine perception and artificial intelligence (2000) 42:132–147.
2. Brandt, R.D., Lin, F.: Representations that uniquely characterize images modulo translation,
rotation, and snewblockcaling. Pattern Recognition Letters (1996), 9(17):1001–1015.
3. Bui, T., Chen, G., Roy, Y.: Translation-invariant multiwavelets for image de-noising. Proc. 3rd
World Multi-Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (1999).
4. Derrode, S., Ghorbel, F.: Robust and efficient fourier-mellin transform approximations for
gray-level image reconstruction and complete invariant description. Proc. 3rd World Multi-
Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers.(2001), 83(1).
5. Deseilligny, M., Le Men, H., Stamon, G.: Characters string recognition on maps, a method for
high level reconstruction. ICDAR (1995), 249–252.
6. Dur Trier, O. Jain, A.K., Taxt, T.: Feature extraction methods for character recognition – a
survey. Pattern Recognition (1996), 4(29):641–662.
7. Goshtasby, A.: Description and discrimination of planar shapes using shapes matrices. IEEE
Transactions of Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence (1985), PAMI-7(6):738–743.
8. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document
recognitionntion. Intelligent Signal Processing, 306–351, 2001.
9. Simard, P., Steinkraus, D., Platt, J.: Best practice for convolutional neural networks applied
to visual document analysis international conference on document analysis and recogntion.
ICDAR, IEEE Computer Society (2003), 958–962.
10. Zhenjiang, M.: Zernike moment-based image shape analysis and its application. Pattern
Recognition Letters (2000), 2(21):169–177.
97