COMPARATIVE OF HAPTIC INTERFACES FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY

J. M. Azorín, J. M. Sabater, N. García, F. J. Martínez, L. Navarro, R. J. Saltarén

2005

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative of different non-specific haptic interfaces that could be used for robot-assisted surgery. The purpose of this analysis is to determine which master interface has the best performance for a specific task in which the master-slave scale factor is less than one. Three haptic interfaces have been considered: two commercial masters, one with serial configuration, the PHANToM 1.5 prototype master, and one with spherical setup, the Microsoft Force Feedback 2 Sidewinder; and other one non commercial with a parallel architecture designed in our laboratory, the Magister-P. Two experiments performed to measure the fidelity of the haptic interfaces have been described and the results obtained have been discussed on this paper.

References

  1. Cleary, K. and Nguyen, C. (2001). State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput Aided Surg., 6 (6):312-328.
  2. Hayward, V. and Astley, O. R. (1996). Performance measures for haptic display. In G.Giralt, G. H. S.-V., editor, Robotic Research: The 7th International Symposium., pages 195-207.
  3. Kühnapfel, U., Camak, H., and Maab, H. (2000). Endoscopic surgery training using virtual reality and deformable tissue simulation. Computer and Graphics, 24:671-682.
  4. Moreyra, M. and Hannaford, B. (1998). A practical measure of dynamic response of haptic devices. In Proc. o the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, pages 369-374.
  5. Ortmaier, T. (2002). Motion compensation in minimally invasive robotic surgery. PhD thesis, Lehrstuhl fur Realzeit-Computersysteme Technische Universitat Munchen.
  6. Sabater, J. M., Saltarén, R., and Aracil, R. (2004). Design, modelling and implementation of a 6 urs parallel haptic device. Robotics and Autonomous System, 47(1):1- 10.
  7. Taylor, R., Paul, H., Kazanzides, P., Mittelstadt, B., Hanson, W., Zuhars, J., Williamson, B., B.Musits, Glassman, E., and Bargar, W. (1991). Taming the bull: Safety in a precise surgical robot. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), number 1, pages 865- 870.
  8. Taylor, R. H. and Stoianovici, D. (2003). Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automatioin, 19 (5):765-781.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

M. Azorín J., M. Sabater J., García N., J. Martínez F., Navarro L. and J. Saltarén R. (2005). COMPARATIVE OF HAPTIC INTERFACES FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY . In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 4: ICINCO, ISBN 972-8865-30-9, pages 375-378. DOI: 10.5220/0001159103750378


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icinco05,
author={J. M. Azorín and J. M. Sabater and N. García and F. J. Martínez and L. Navarro and R. J. Saltarén},
title={COMPARATIVE OF HAPTIC INTERFACES FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 4: ICINCO,},
year={2005},
pages={375-378},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001159103750378},
isbn={972-8865-30-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 4: ICINCO,
TI - COMPARATIVE OF HAPTIC INTERFACES FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY
SN - 972-8865-30-9
AU - M. Azorín J.
AU - M. Sabater J.
AU - García N.
AU - J. Martínez F.
AU - Navarro L.
AU - J. Saltarén R.
PY - 2005
SP - 375
EP - 378
DO - 10.5220/0001159103750378