http://www.autotutor.org). The research on
AutoTutor was supported by the National Science
Foundation (SBR 9720314, REC 0106965, REC
0126265, ITR 0325428) and the DoD
Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
(MURI) administered by ONR under grant N00014-
00-1-0600. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions
or recommendations expressed in this material are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
the views of DoD, ONR, or NSF.
REFERENCES
Ainsworth, S. & Grimshaw, S (2002). Evaluating the
Effectiveness and Efficiency of the REDEEM
Intelligent Tutoring System Authoring Tool. Retrieved
October 26, 2004, from the University of Nottingham,
ESRC Centre for Research in Development,
Instruction, and Training web site:
www.psychology.nottingham.ac.uk/staff/sea/techreport
_69.pdf
Aleven, V. & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective
metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and
explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor.
Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
Bautista, K. Person, N., Graesser, A. C., & Tutoring
Research Group (2002). Human or computer?
AutoTutor in a bystander Turing test. In Proceedings
of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent
Tutoring Systems (pp. 821-830). Berlin, Germany:
Springer-Verlag.
Bhatti, N., Bouch, A., & Kuchinsky, A. (2000).
Integrating User-Perceived Quality into Web Server
Design. In Proceedings of the Ninth International
World Wide Web Conference. May 2000. Amsterdam.
Retrieved January 22, 2005 from:
http://www9.org/w9cdrom/92/92.html
Bouch, A. & Sasse, M. A. (1999). It ain't what you charge
it's the way that you do it: A user perspective of
network QoS and pricing. In Proceedings of IM'99.
Boston: IFIP.
Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982).
Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of
findings, American Educational Research Journal, 19,
237-248.
Corbett, A. T. (2001). Cognitive computer tutors: Solving
the two-sigma problem. In User Modeling:
Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference (pp.
137-147). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Galaxy Communicator Documentation. (n.d.) Retrieved
December 17, 2004, from
http://communicator.sourceforge.net/sites/MITRE/dist
ributions/GalaxyCommunicator/docs/manual/index.ht
ml
Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Mathews, E. C., Mitchell,
H. H., Olney, A., Ventura, M., et al. (2003).
Why/AutoTutor: A test of learning gains from a
physics tutor with natural language dialogue. In
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1-6). Boston, MA:
Cognitive Science Society.
Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H.,
Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. M. (in press).
AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language.
Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and
Computers.
Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995).
Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-on-
one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 359-
387.
Graesser, A. C., VanLehn, K., Rosé, C., Jordan, P., &
Harter, D. (2001). Intelligent tutoring systems with
conversational dialogue. AI Magazine, 22, 39-51.
Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000).
Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction
in interactive learning environments. International
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47-
78.
Jordan, P., Rosé, C., & VanLehn, K. (2001). Tools for
authoring tutorial dialogue knowledge. In
Proceedings of AI in Education 2001 Conference.
May 2001. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Mathews, E. C., Jackson, G. T., Olney, A., Chipman, P. &
Graesser, A. C. (2003). Achieving Domain
Independence in AutoTutor. In N. Callaos, M.
Margenstern, J. Zhang, O. Castillo, E. Doberkat
(Eds.), The Seventh World Multiconference on
Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics Proceedings:
Computer Science and Engineerings I, Vol. 5 (pp. 172-
176). Orlando: IIIS.
Microsoft .NET Technology Overview. (n.d.) Seattle, WA:
Microsoft Corp. Retrieved October 11, 2004, from:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/technologyin
fo/overview/default.aspx
Moreno, K. N., Klettke, B., Nibbaragandla, K., Graesser,
A. C., & the Tutoring Research Group (2002).
Perceived characteristics and pedagogical efficacy of
animated conversational agents. In S. A. Cerri, G.
Gouarderes, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.), Intelligent
Tutoring Systems 2002 (pp. 963-971). Berlin,
Germany: Springer.
Olney, A., Louwerse, M. M., Mathews, E. C., Marineau,
J., Mitchell, H. H., & Graesser, A. C. (2003).
Utterance classification in AutoTutor. In Building
Educational Applications using Natural Language
Processing: Proceedings of the Human Language
Technology - North American Chapter of the
Association for Computational Linguistics Conference
2003 Workshop (pp. 1-8). Philadelphia: Association
for Computational Linguistics.
WEBIST 2005 - E-LEARNING
472