networks using Virtual Private networks (VPNs)
(Iyer et al. 2003)(BTOpenZone ).
2.2 Virtual Private Networks (VPN)
Since the first deployment of data networks in
corporations, the need for intercommunication
between them has came into attention. Companies
have historically used leased lines and ISDN
internetworking solutions between its offices to
make a Wide Area Networks (WANs). WANs had
obvious advantages over dialup servers such as
reliability, security and performance. Unfortunately,
WANs had two main disadvantages; the first being
is the inflexibility of such a solution. Access to such
network is restricted from sites where the leased line
is connected or where there is ISDN on that site. The
second disadvantage is the overhead costs for
maintaining such networks. This took WAN out of
the solutions list for small and medium enterprises.
During the last few years, companies have
started implementing their own Virtual Private
Networks (VPNs). These are private networks that
use public networks (usually the internet) as an
intermediate communication medium. It creates a
virtual tunnel between different company’s sites.
Every user is authenticated separately in a very
secure manner. VPN security provides four different
layers of security which makes it a very safe option
for corporations. In general VPNs offeres a cheaper
and more flexible alternative to WANs without
jeopardising the security of the firm. It provides a
lower cost of ownership and maintenance, which
leads to a faster return on investment. It also
provides flexibility on different levels. Once a VPN
is established, the number of users can be easily
increased according to the organization needs at a
very low cost. Geographically speaking, a VPN
using the Internet as a medium can theoretically be
accessed from anywhere in the world at a very low
cost. This became very useful for companies with a
high global coverage, where connecting a WAN to
hundreds of small offices and branches was
financially unfeasible. Another major application
came with the spread of mobile computing. Users
can now connect to their corporate networks while
they are travelling using Hotspots or widely
available mobile phone networks (Strayer 2004)
(Andersson 2001).
3 TESTBED
A testbed has been constructed as shown in figure
using the available infrastructure of Brunel
University network and BTopenzone in order to
collect real results from a live network. A mobile
terminal (laptop) running VPN client software was
connected to a BTOpenZone hotspot access point
via WLAN 802.11b network card. Access to Brunel
University FTP and web servers was established via
a VPN tunnel. The testbed setup has been chosen in
a way to reflect a real-live scenario, covering a wide
range of possible applications.
In order to evaluate the general performance of
the network, test has been performed to assess the
main link characteristics (Hunaiti et al.
2004)(Chakravorty, Pratt 2002)(Chakravorty, Clark
& Pratt 2005), which include: upload throughput,
downlink throughput, Round-Trip Time (RTT) and
packet loss. These parameters can reflect the
performance of the majority of applications. For
measuring uplink and downlink throughput,
Microsoft network performance analyzer was used.
This allowed the capture of both uplink and
downlink traffic between the mobile terminal and
the FTP server. For measuring Round-Trip Time
(RTT) and packet loss, ping command from DOS
command prompt has been used. Pinging Brunel
University web server “www.brunel.ac.uk"
presented the round trip delay and the percentage of
lost packets between the mobile terminal and the
web server.
4 EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS
Throughput test: The throughput test was
performed to investigate the real data transfer speed
that can be achieved over a real life hotspot. Both
uplink and downlink throughputs were tested.
Throughput measurements were based on measuring
the transfer speed between the mobile terminal (the
Figure 1: Testbed
WLAN 802.11b
VPN Client
BT OpenZone
Public Internet
FTP Server
Web Server
www.brunel.ac.uk
Brunel University
Network
Firewall
100 Mbps
VPN Gateway
VPN Tunnle
WLAN
Access Point
EVALUATING THE USAGE OF WIRELESS BROADBAND HOTSPOTS
137