results achieved in both learning methods (face-to-
face and SMS-based learning).
4.2.1 Pre-test
In t-test, we got result, h = 0, which means that we
cannot reject the null hypothesis. The significance
was 0.1870, which means that by chance we would
have observed values of t more extreme than the one
in this example in 1870 of 10,000 similar
experiments. The differential means of both learning
was 0.2737. A 95% confidence interval on the mean
was [-0.1387, 0.6861], which includes the
theoretical (and hypothesized) difference of 0.1870.
4.2.2 Post-test
When degree of certainty equals 0.02 or less, the
result, h = 0, means that we cannot reject the null
hypothesis. The significance is 0.0274, which means
that by chance we would have observed values of t
more extreme than the one in this example in only
274 of 10,000 similar experiments. For degree of
certainty=0.02, a 95% confidence interval on the
mean is [-1.9303, 0.0553], which includes the
theoretical (and hypothesized) difference of -0.9375.
But when it is 0.03 or more, the result, h = 1, means
that we can reject the null hypothesis. The results of
the t-test showed that the post-test results of the
Distance Learning class were at least as good as the
f2f classroom.
5 RELATED WORKS
In (Jackson, R.H. 2001 ) Jackson argued that
technology-enhanced e-Learning is where the
learner audience has the opportunity to meet face-to-
face with the instructor and is a supplement to
traditional, on campus learning. In (Taylor, R. 2002)
Taylor agreed with Jackson and stated that e-
Learning can be used effectively in several different
forms. It can be used as a stand-alone asynchronous
program, or as a synchronous class where all the
students are online at the same time, or as an add-on
to traditional classroom presentations. In
(Alexander, S. 2001) authors further argued that
using technology in both classroom and distance
learning would improve the quality of learning.The
drawbacks of conventional distance-learning is that
it requires more maturity and self-discipline from
students than traditional classroom education, which
may explain the higher dropout rates in distance-
learning programs compared to conventional
programs (Hiltz, S.R. and Wellman, B. , 1997),
(Kumar, A. et al., 2001). A lot of work has been
done in developing prototype-based distance
learning. Some recent Intelligent E-Learning tools
comprising interactive multimedia through Internet
and prototype are illustrated in (Michelle, S. ,
2003)(Peter B., 2004)(Zhang, D. et al., 2004). Our
proposed method overcomes the above problems,
which is validated through questionnaire-based
observation and statistical ‘T-testing’.
6 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE
WORK
The Distance Learning classroom was not in a “real”
rural setting where students would be separated
geographically but would have access to a television
network that would air the educational program.
During the test, the students were sitting side by side
as in a normal classroom. This however brought
home another point. The SMS technology can also
be used in a normal f2f classroom to log and check
answers. The server would track students who are
not answering questions and send them a warning
SMS and remind them of their current status. In the
f2f classroom, students answered questions on a
piece of paper, however, the instructor was not able
to monitor students who were not answering
questions. The mobile as a tool and an input-output
device would be useful in a normal f2f classroom
situation.
However, in the last 10 minutes of a class
session, stude
nts can also ask questions via SMS to
the presenter. The computer would group the
questions for the presenter. The cryptic language
used for sending SMS adds another dimension of
difficulty to grouping questions. This part was left
for future work. Research has also to be done on the
kind of courses that can be taught in this manner,
e.g. whether English language can be taught in this
manner. If it can, it would be very useful for places
like Bangladesh where there is a severe shortage of
English teachers.
REFERENCES
Distance learning overviews; http://www.uwex.edu
/disted/definition.html
Http://cfcc.net/dutch/DistanceEd.htm
Benefits and limitations of Distance Learning; http://
www.nc.gsu.edu
/~mstswh/courses/it7000/papers/newp
age12.htm
MOSAIC groups report; http:// som.csudh.edu/ fac/
lpress/devnat/nations/Banglad
esh/bdmosaic.htm
MOBILE TELEPHONE TECHNOLOGY AS A DISTANCE LEARNING TOOL
231