![](bg6.png)
4 Conclusion
In this paper, we propose to complete the research area in semi-structured documents
- that is the main interest of our research group - by the adaptation research area via
an architecture extended from a previous proposal. The architecture aims at gathering
relevant and adaptation research works [2] [5] through which, we have distinguished
two adaptation processes: upstream of user’s query and downstream from user’s
query. In order to validate our proposition, a perspective of our work is to develop
respectively an algorithm for both adaptation processes: (i) to enrich the user’s que-
ries by the user profile that is initialized by permanent characteristics and updated by
changing user’s characteristics, (ii) to adapt the results according to query enrich-
ment.
References
1. Sèdes, F.: Bases documentaires–Hyperbases Proposition d’un modèle générique et
contribution à la spécification d’un langage pour l’intégration et la manipulation
d’informations semi structurées. HDR de l’Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III,
Décembre (1998)
2. Amous, I., Jedidi, A., Sèdes, F.: A Contribution to Multimedia Document Modeling and
Querying. Multimedia Tools and Application, 25, 391-404, 2005
3. Albano A., Colazzo D., Ghelli G., Manghi P.: A type system for querying XML docu-
ments, in Proc. ACM SIGIR Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval, Athens,
Greece, July 28, 2000
4. Zayani, C., A., Sèdes, F., Canut, M.-F., Amous, I., Péninou, A.: Vers une Approche
d’Architecture d’un Système Hypermédia Adaptatif. In Proceedings of the IBIMA Internet
and Information Technology in Modern Organizations: Challenges & Answers, Cairo,
Egypt, 13-15 décembre (2005) 668-672.
5. Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive hypermedia," User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
(1:2), Novembre (2001) 87-110.
6. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xquery-20050915/ (W3C Working Draft 15 September
2005)
7. Kobsa, A., and Koenemann, J., and Pohl, W.: Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Tech-
niques for Improving Online Customer Relationships. In The Knowledge Engineering Re-
view 16(2) (2001) 111-155.
161