the size of the population N=100; the selection rule
is fitness-proportionate selection, the crossover rule
is one-point crossover and the mutation rule is
uniform mutation; the probability of crossover
P
c
=0.5 while that of mutation P
m
=0.1, α=0.4,β
1
=0.45,
β
2
=0.51, β
3
=0.38, times of evolution are 10000.
Generate
ε
j
according to (4) to construct intervals
(0) (0)
(, )
jj j
xx
ε
−+
, which can be viewed in Table 4.
In order to find out the optimal intervals of
x
j
, the
second step is carried out: 500 individuals
(1) ( 2) (500)
{, ,, }XX X"
are generated randomly with their
gene
()k
j
selected from
(0) (0)
(, )
jj j
xx
ε
−+
. The
fitness function is still defined by (3).When
P
c
=0.5 ,P
m
=0.05, evolution times are 5000. It turned
out that there are totally 491 individuals satisfying:
() () ()
11 22 33
0.01, 0.05, 0.01
kk k
mid mid mid
YY YY YY
−−−
−< −< −<
Let w=300, choose the top w individuals and the
interval of the j
th
gene, noted as
1 300
[, ]
jj
x
, generated
from these individuals are shown in Table 5.
Table 4: Intervals of influencing factors in the first-step.
Factor
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
4
x
5
x
6
x
7
x
8
x
9
(0)
jj
x
−
4.05 4.73 2.82 2.41 4.16 1.83 2.81 3.16 1.55
(0)
j
x
+
4.82 4.99 4.19 2.91 4.95 3.63 3.75 4.37 3.03
Table 5: Final intervals of influencing factors.
Factor
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
4
x
5
x
6
x
7
x
8
x
9
1
4.31 4.73 3.36 2.59 4.46 2.47 3.05 3.57 2.22
300
4.45 4.93 3.61 2.82 4.78 2.96 3.44 3.84 2.41
5000 test samples are generated in the corresponding
intervals. Compare the outputs
Y
i
with the anticipant
ranges. We conclude that the probability that the
outputs fall in the anticipant ranges is about 99.5%,
which means as long as the influencing factors are
held at the levels between those shown in Table 5,
the E-Business income could be controlled under the
expectation shown in Table 3 effectively.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The interval genetic algorithm of multi-objective can
effectively solve the optimization control problems
with multiple objectives and variables, which can
hardly be solved by traditional methods. Enterprises
can control the E-Business income and profit
effectively by taking the process control of the
influencing factors. Not only does the result of this
paper provide a feasible way to realize the anticipant
income of E-Business but also can be promoted to
the optimal control problems in other domains.
REFERENCES
Liao Q. , Gu H. M., Hao Z. F. (2005). Fuzzy
Comprehensive Evaluation of E-Commerce and
Process Improvement. Lecture Notes in Computer
Science No. 3828, pp. 366-374.
Li K.,Guo M.Y., Li L.(2004). Switching cost, market
effects and the pricing model of e-Commerce. Proc.
IEEE Int. Conf. Serv. Comput. SCC, pp. 403-408.
Pham, Trung T. (2004). Quantitative approach to using
E-commerce data to monitor and control the
performance of a supply chain.
Proc. IEEE Int. Conf.
e_technology e-Commerce e-Service EEE, pp.
157-162.
Liu Z. Squillante M.S. Wolf J.L. (2002). Optimal
control of resource allocation in e-business
environments with strict quality-of-service
performance guarantees. Decision and Control,
Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conf., pp.4431- 4439.
Liao Q., Li J., Hao Z. F., Li X. W. (2005). Optimized
Fuzzy Evaluation Model on Security Risk of
Underground network, Asia Pacific Symposium on
Safety , pp. 129-135.
Li Y. Q. & Liao Q. (2004). Influence Factors and
Mathematical Modeling of the Security of
Underground Gas Conduit Network. Journal of South
China of University of Technology
(
Natural Science
Edition
)
, Vol. 32, pp. 89-93.
OPTIMIZATION CONTROL OF E-BUSINESS INCOME BASING ON INTERVAL GENETIC ALGORITHM OF
MULTI-OBJECTIVE
203