not purchasing from Internet (Egger, 2002). From
this perspective, how the buyer is afforded an
opportunity with trust is an important research issue
and a big challenge for online firms (Koufaris and
Hampton-Sosa, 2004). Also it has become
increasingly important to understand the factors
which influence consumer purchase decisions in the
web context (Siala et al., 2004). Trust is a complex
and a hard to describe concept that has been widely
studied (Ambrose and Johnson, 1998); it remains
numerous and confusing (Stewart, 1999). However,
the most commonly cited definition of trust in
various contexts [according to (Rousseau et al.,
1998)] is the “willingness of a party to be vulnerable
to the actions of another party based on the
expectations that the other will perform a particular
action important to the trustor”, as proposed by
(Mayer et al., 1995). This conceptualization of trust,
which is also known as “trusting intentions”
(McKnigh et al., 2002) and trustworthiness
(Jarvenpaa et al., 2000), is based on a set of beliefs
that others upon whom one depends will behave in a
socially acceptable manner by showing appropriate
integrity, benevolence, and ability (Doney and
Cannon, 1997); (Gefen, 2002); (Mayer et al., 1995);
(McKnigh et al., 2002). These three beliefs are
labelled by most research as “trust beliefs” (Gefen,
2002); (McKnigh et al., 2002), although (Mayer et
al., 1995) labelled these as “trustworthiness”. Ability
deal with the e-Vendor's knowledge, competence,
and provision of good service. Integrity deals with
the e-Vendor's honesty and keeping of promises.
The benevolence deals with the e-Vendor's
benevolence, willingness to assist and support, and
with consideration toward the customer. Trust is
defined by some research as behavioral intentions,
by others as beliefs, and yet by others as a mixture
of both.
The existence of multiple definitions of trust in
the research is probable due to two reasons
(McKnigh et al., 2002): First, each discipline views
trust from its own exclusive perspective. Second,
trust by itself is a fuzzy term. The other difficulty
has been that empirical research has driven most
definitions of trust, and one needs only to define one
type of trust to do empirical research. Within the
compact e-commerce domain of research, trust has
been defined as a willingness to believe (Clarke,
1999), or an individual’s beliefs, regarding the
various attributes of the other party (Yamagishi and
Yamagishi, 1994).
In the online context, the definition and
operationalization of trust has been a source of
considerable debate (AlDiri and Hobbs, 2006). Very
often, trust has been defined as a belief regarding the
characteristics of the company to be trusted (Kumar
et al., 1995; Luhmann, 1979; Mayer et al., 1995;
Fung and Lee, 1999; Menon et al., 1999; Stewart,
1999). Those characteristics usually include the
company’s integrity, benevolence and competence
or ability, all of which comprise the company’s
trustworthiness, as perceived by the customer.
In this study a further isolated type of perceived
company trustworthiness was examined by using
only new customers in the study sample. Therefore,
the results indicate how customers develop initial
trust beliefs in a company online after only their first
visit and without having any prior experience with
the company (McKnight et al., 1998; McKnight et
al., 2002). Past experience with a company was
recognized as an important determinant of customer
trust but this study does not examine it. Instead we
look at how information gathered during an initial
interaction with the web site can affect the
customer’s initial perceptions of the e-commerce
vendor’s trustworthiness.
2.1 Online Trust and Interpersonal
Cues
In contrast to face-to-face commerce and to other
applications, there are typically no social
interactions in e-commerce websites, neither direct
nor implied (Gefen and Straub, 2004). Online
vendors face a significant challenge in making their
virtual storefront socially rich (Kumar and Benbasat,
2002). Online consumers’ perceptions of social
presence cues which are also known as interpersonal
cues have been shown to positively influence trust
and their subsequent intention to purchase from a
commercial website (Chong et al., 2003), (Kumar
and Benbasat, 2002). In the field of human-computer
interaction (HCI), (Nass et al., 1996) created a
paradigm of “Computers Are Social Actors”
(CASA); this approach by some researchers has
been referred to as ‘‘virtual re-embedding’’
(Riegelsberger and Sasse, 2002). The CASA
paradigm suggests that social dynamics and rules
guiding human-human interaction apply equally well
to human-computer interactions. Many studies have
testified the CASA paradigm (Lee et al., 2003).
Under this paradigm, researchers constantly found
out that individuals tend to think of media (i.e.
computers, computer interfaces, agencies, computer
generated voice, etc.) as their counterparts -
intelligent social beings - when they are interacting
with them. Instilling a sense of human presence and
sociability can be accomplished by providing the
ICE-B 2007 - International Conference on e-Business
228