The third CSF is ‘Decreased Time-to-Market.’
Using current technologies, the creation and delivery
of new services is a long and costly process.
However, the horizontal nature of the IMS
architecture allows for re-use of common functions
and service enablers, thereby reducing the
development effort. Its standardised nature also
allows for faster integration and deployment.
The fourth and final CSF is ‘Decreased Costs’,
and for the mobile operator the ability of the IMS
architecture to cut costs is its biggest benefit. Firstly,
it can be used to decrease some of the internal
operational costs, by making these processes more
efficient. However, the biggest savings from IMS
will be in the future, when the architecture can be
used to handle voice calls, which means that the
operator will be able to retire their costly circuit-
switched core network.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Mobile operators are facing increasing competition
as more and more competitors enter the market, and
as their penetration rates in some countries hit
saturation point. Operators in the Irish marketplace
are faced with both of these threats, increasing
competition in the shape of MVNOs, and a
subscriber penetration rate of over 103%. These
operators have a number of CSFs that are particular
to their competitive market, and identifying them is
the first step to addressing them. IMS is a new
technology that promises a revolution in terms of
our communications capabilities, however it is
important to see if IMS could address the CSFs of
the operators.
Once the CSFs were identified, they were each
considered, to see how IMS could contribute in a
positive manner to meeting the objectives of each
particular factor. This contribution was based on the
strengths and opportunities of the IMS architecture
that were identified during the study, and from the
feedback received from the major Irish mobile
operator, in terms of the possible usage scenarios,
i.e. the IMS-Imp and the iISP.
Having considered the strengths and
opportunities inherent in the IMS, and types of
applications it enables, such as location-based m-
commerce, it was concluded that IMS could have an
impact on all of the CSFs.
It was also concluded that the CSFs identified
were not only applicable to the Irish operators, but to
any operators that compete in a similar marketplace,
i.e. one that is mature in terms of saturation levels
and that is facing increasing competition.
REFERENCES
3G Americas, 2004. “IP Multimedia Subsystem IMS:
Overview and Applications” 3G Americas,
USA,http://www.3gamericas.org/pdfs/ims_july2004.p
df
Barnes, S. J., 2002. “The Mobile Commerce Value Chain:
Analysis and Future Developments” International
Journal of Information Management, Vol. 22, pp 91 –
108, Elsevier Science
Ericsson AB., 2004a. “IMS – IP Multimedia Subsystem:
The Value of using the IMS Architecture” Ericsson
Whitepaper,
http://www.ericsson.com/products/white_papers_pdf/ims_
ip_multimedia_subsystem.pdf
Keshav, S., 2005. “Why Cell Phones Will Dominate the
Future Internet” ACM SIG COMM Computer
Communication Review, Vol. 35, Issue 2, April, pp 83
– 86, ACM Press, New York
Mc Mahon, B., 2005. “Internal Communications within
O2: Part 2”, Follow up interview with O2 employee,
Tuesday 15
th
November
Paavilainen, J., 2002. Mobile Business Strategies,
Wireless Press, Addison-Wesley, Great Britain
Rao, B. & Minakakis, L., 2003. “Evolution of Mobile
Location-based Services”
Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, No. 12, New
York, ACM Press
Siemens AG, 2004. Siemens IP Multimedia Subsystem
(IMS): The Domain for Services, Siemens,
Whitepaper,
http://communications.siemens.com/repository/729/72
935/Backgrounder_IMS.pdf
Tadault, M., Thiebaut, L. & Soormally, S., 2004. Network
Evolution towards an IP Multimedia Subsystem,
Compagnie Financiere Alcatel, France,
http://www.alcatel.com/doctypes/articlepaperlibrary/html/
ATR2003Q4/ATR2003Q4A16_EN.jhtml
Turban, E., King, D., Viehland, D., & Lee, J., 2006.
Electronic Commerce 2006: A managerial
perspective, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
UTMS Forum, 2002. IMS Service Vision for 3G Markets,
UTMS Forum Report, Report No. 20,
May,http://www.umtsforum.org/servlet/dycon/ztumts/
umts/Live/en/umts/MultiMedia_PDFs_Reports_report
20web.pdf
ICEIS 2007 - International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
256