day by increasing the enthusiasm of the patient in
executing the variety of rehabilitation exercises.”
In the patient's opinion: “At the beginning I felt
that my arm was too "heavy", and at the shoulder I
felt as if there was something cutting me, now I feel
it less heavy and the cutting sensation has also been
reduced.”
An “analogical visual scale” in the range 1-10
(very bad, ..., excellent) was applied, asking the
patient about the treatment based on GT, he gave it a
10. Asked about if he will like to continue using GT,
his answer was “YES”.
The Fugl-Meyer scale (3 points increase) was not
sufficiently sensitive to detect the clear clinical and
subjective improvement in the patient.
4 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE
WORK
This single case shows the importance of motivation
in rehabilitation. Involving the patient in simulated
daily activities helps the psychological rehabilitation
component as well. The potential ease of use,
motivation promoting characteristics, and objective
quantitative potential are obvious advantages to this
system. The patient can work independently with
reduced therapist interaction. With current
technology the system can be adapted to a portable
low-cost device for the home including
communications for remote interaction with a
therapist and medical team.
It is possible to extend the system to a full arm
tracking, including wrist, hand and fingers for more
accurate movements. Movement trajectories can be
compared and used to add a new metric of patient
progress. To make the system easier to use a GUI
tool is planned for system parameters configuration,
including the camera. Future work includes more
games to increase the variety of therapy solutions
and adaptability to patient abilities, so that a
therapist or patient can match the amount of
challenge necessary to keep the rehabilitation
advancing.
In the current low-cost, vision-based system the
table top serves as an arm support for 2D movement
until the patients are strong enough to lift their arms
into 3D. Extending the system to wrist, hand, and
finger movement is planned to make a full superior
extremity rehabilitation system.
Wrist accelerometers can be used to increase the
objectivity of clinical studies in addition to
subjective reports of patients and caregivers;
especially when the patient spends less time in the
clinic. (Uswatte 2006). fMRI of patients’ brains, pre
and post training, are planned for increasing our
understanding of the biological basis for
rehabilitation (Johansen-Berg 2002).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported in part by a grant from
UC-MEXUS/CONACYT.
REFERENCES
American Stroke Association, 2004. Retrieved July 10,
2007 from http://www.strokeassociation.org.
G.R. Bradski, 1998. Computer vision face tracking as a
component of a perceptual user interface. In Workshop
on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 214-219.
A. R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jaasko, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S.
Steglind, 1975. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a
method for evaluation of physical performance. In
Scand J Rehabil Med, vol. 7, pp. 13-31.
D. Reinkensmeyer, C. Pang, J. Nessler, and C. Painter,
2002. Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper-
extremity after stroke. In IEEE Transactions on
Neural Science and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol.
10, pp. 1-7.
R. J. Sanchez, J. Liu, S. Rao, P. Shah, R. Smith, T.
Rahman, S. C. Cramer, J. E. Bobrow, and D.
Reinkensmeyer, 2006. Automating arm movement
training following severe stroke: Functional exercise
with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced
environment. In IEEE Trans. Neural. Sci. Rehabil.
Eng., vol. 14(3), pp. 378-389.D. Reinkensmeyer, S.
Housman, Vu Le, T. Rahman and R. Sanchez, 2007.
Arm-Training with T-WREX After Chronic Stroke:
Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
In ICORR 2007, 10
th
International Conference on
Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk.
D. Reinkensmeyer and S. Housman, 2007. If I can’t do it
once, why do it a hundred times?: Connecting volition
to movement success in a virtual environment
motivates people to exercise the arm after stroke. In
IWVR 2007
G, Uswatte, C. Giuliani, C. Winstein, A. Zeringue, L.
Hobbs, SL Wolf, 2006. Validity of accelerometry for
monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with
subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity
constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Med
Rehabil: 86:1340-1345.
H. Johansen-Berg, H. Dawes, C. Guy, S.M. Smith, D.T.
Wade and P.M. Matthews, 2002 Correlation between
motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after
rehabilitative therapy. Brain Journal: 125, 2731-2742
GESTURE THERAPY - A Low-Cost Vision-Based System for Rehabilitation after Stroke
111