strong density of individuals and a contamination by
proximity?
Figure 3: Burst activity.
3 CSMA/CA AND THE SHARED
MEDIUM
The basic principle of CSMA consists in listening to
the medium before emitting when a station has a
pending (ready to be emitted) frame (Chen, 1994).
On the discharge of the medium the station applies a
method to manage the possible competition with
other stations. In the case of the CA (Collision
Avoidance) method the stations draw a back-off
period to desynchronize the potential candidates.
The detection of an activity on the network is
carried out by the measurement of the power of the
received electromagnetic radiation. If this
measurement is higher than the fixed threshold for
the noise, the medium is regarded as being busy.
In the case of WiFi, the contention resolution
mechanism is governed by the 802.11 standard
specifications
(ANSI/IEEE Std 802.11, 1999). For
the DCF (Distributed Coordination Function) mode
a station having a pending frame may begin to
access only when the radio channel is sensed Idle.
That is the case when the PHY layer performs a
“Clear Channel Assessment (CCA)” which returns
“IDLE” as the value of the CCA Indicator. This is
the case when the energy level received is lower
than a threshold very often estimated at - 95 dBm
(value given by the suppliers of WiFi interface). It is
this value which is passed in parameter (CSThresh:
Carrier Sense Threshold) for a simulation by NS2
(Wu Xiuchao, n.d.) and which creates a little
polemic for a simulation by OPNET
(S. Roy, H. Ma,
R. Vijayakumar & J. Zhu, 2006). Let us consider a
signal received with a power Pr higher than the
Carrier Sense Threshold, it allows to identify the
fact that the channel is indeed busy but it is not a
sufficient condition so that the information
transported by the signal can be suitably interpreted.
For that it is necessary that the receiver has a Margin
of Decoding (MD) which depends on the
modulation used for the transmission (Intersil Data
Sheet HFA3861B, 2001). For example, it is admitted
that in the case of a WiFi network the decoding of a
frame with 11 Mbps requires that the energy of the
signal received be higher than - 82 dBm. It is the
value which is passed via the RXThresh parameter
in a NS2 simulation. This obviously implies that the
area in which the signal is perceived as higher than -
95 dBm is much larger than the zone of reception. If
we illustrate that by a mechanism of contamination
by cough simulated using an access method of the
type CSMA/CA, a person who coughs prevents from
coughing people whom it does not reach!
This is illustrated in the parts (a) and (b) of
figure 4. The most external disc represents the
surface in which the CCA indicator has the value
BUSY, the disc delimited by -82 dBm corresponds
to the surface in which the reception is done with an
acceptable error rate.
Regardless of the nature of the medium, at a
short distance from the transmitter, it is standard to
consider that the law of dispersion of energy is in
1/D².
If we know the transmission power, it will
possible then to deduce the received power at the
security (or contamination) distance which we
introduced. Thus for a transmission power of 20
dBm the power hoped at 2 meters is - 26 dBm. It is
what corresponds to the smallest disc of part (b) of
figure 4.
In the same way by adjusting the power of
transmission to -36 dBm, the threshold of reception
of -82 dBm corresponds to the distance of
contamination. This is represented by the part (c) of
figure 4.
At this stage we can discuss the effect of the
Clear Channel Assessment (CCA). A transmission
with 11 Mbps and a power of - 36 dBm has an
impact which goes well beyond a disc of 2 meters
because of the CCA which covers a surface with a
power higher than - 95 dBm. By reducing the power
of emission we also reduced considerably the
surface of carrier sensing. Using NS2 we will
evaluate the effects of reducing the power of
transmission, on the simulation of the process of
contagion.
T
1
T
2
Burst emission of
contaminant messa
es
A NOVEL APPROACH FOR SIMULATING A BIO-CONTAMINATION PROCESS
125