from the worldwide web during the period of
September-October 2007.
5 USABILITY ISSUES
The usability issues envisioned from the “Research-
Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines-2006”,
the reasons I’ve selected this book, First because it is
published by the U.S. Department of Health &
Human Services and as forwarded: “effectively
respond to the President’s Management Agenda and
his E-government Act of 2002”. Second, the
contributors are: “Carefully selected panels of
professional Web designers, usability specialists,
and academic researchers” (U.S. HHS, 2003). Third
“the Guidelines have been widely used by
government agencies and the private sector,
implemented in academic curriculum, and translated
into several foreign languages” (U.S. HHS, 2006).
Also I’ve returned to many original references and
books to get more information which could help in
better usability investigation.
5.1 Communicating and Emphasizing
the Web Site’s Value and Purpose
Many users waste their time or even leave because
they misunderstand the purpose of a Web site. Most
people browsing or searching the Web will spend
very little time on each site. Emphasizing what the
site offers is the real value to users (Nielsen, 2003).
The Egyptian Ministry of CIT has performed an
exploratory study on the Governmental sector
employees opinions about the e-GOV project and
the implementation framework, the study discovered
that the most important and effective factor on the e-
GOV workflow is the citizens perception and
awareness about the importance and advantages
which could be achieved from using and
participating in the new e-governmental services,
and the adjustment between the new services and the
citizens life-style (e-Gov Program, MCIT, 2004).
From this study we clearly state the importance of
communicating and emphasizing the website value
and purpose and its impact on the implementation of
the E-GOV program and achieving its targeted
objectives.
We shouldn't expect users to read a lot of text or
to click into the Site to determine a Site’s purpose
(U.S. HHS, 2006). Designers should clearly and
prominently communicate the purpose and value of
the Web site on the homepage. In some cases the
purpose of a Web site is easily inferred. In other
cases, it may need to be explicitly stated through the
use of brief text or a tagline (U.S. HHS, 2006).
5.2 Optimizing the Credibility of
Information-oriented Web Sites
Fogg, B.J. and others (April 2001) perform large
quantitative study on “What Makes Web Sites
Credible?” they outline some design implications
and present them as proposed guidelines for creating
highly credible Web sites, I will represent the
guidelines in simple and conciseness context: (Fogg,
B.J. and others-April 2001)
• Convey the “real world” aspect of the organization
through the design such as listing a physical
address and showing employee photographs.
Highlighting features that communicate the
legitimacy and accessibility of the organization.
• Including markers of expertise is a key component
in credibility. Important “expertise” elements
include listing an author’s credentials and
including citations and references.
• Including markers of trustworthiness by Adding
design elements such as linking to outside
materials and sources, stating a policy on content.
• Tailoring and personalizing the user experience:
People think a site is more credible when it
acknowledges that the user has visited it before.
• Avoid the pitfalls of amateurism: Organizations
should be ever vigilant—and perhaps obsessive—
and avoid small glitches in their Web sites. These
“small” glitches seem to have a large impact on
Web credibility perceptions.
5.3 Ensure Visual Consistency of
Website Elements within and
between Web Pages
Consistent placement of interface elements can help
users learn to recognize them, allowing maximum
benefit from experience using the site (Badre, 2002).
Mendes, Suomi, and Passos (2004) discussed the
low user take-up of e-Services as a main problem:
Many examinations and assessments have revealed
deficiencies. Long is the list of shortcomings: a
general lack in targeting the audience; an inadequate
and inconsistent design lacking of comments and
adequate examples; a sloppiness in maintenance
showing unreliable and outdated pieces of
information.
Two studies found that the number of errors
made using visually inconsistent displays is reliably
higher than when using visually consistent displays.
USABILITY AND ITS ROLE IN ENHANCING THE ONLINE USER EXPERIENCE IN THE EGYPTIAN
WEB-BASED GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES PORTALS
309