decision and purchasing. In a situation of a high
selling price the capacity of the shopping agents to
identify the lower price offer is considered important
by the majority of respondents. High percentages are
also provided for the capacity of the shopping agent to
select the required product, to provide additional
information about offer and/or vendor, as well as the
rankings and comments of previous customers. These
results can be explained by the high transaction risk
that is associated with a high product price.
Gradually, as the price level is medium and low, the
need for additional information becomes less
important. The need for a precise selection of the
lower price offer and of the required products is lower
when the price is small, but the percentage of
respondents that consider these factors as important
still remains relatively high. The proportion of people
that indicated the ease of interaction as important
remains quite stable in all three price situations.
As expected, a low familiarity of the customer with
the product determines a high request for
information related to the offer, vendor and previous
customers’ experience. Inversely, the shoppers
familiar with the product indicate a low importance
of additional information, focusing their needs on
the capacity of the shopping agent to identify
precisely the best price offer and a specific product.
When the product acquired online will be used a
long time, the respondents consider as particularly
important the capacity to obtain rich information
about the product, vendor and previous customers’
experience. This tendency is determined by the risk
associated with the transaction, taking into account
that, usually, the products with a long life-time are
also relatively expensive. However, the other quality
characteristics are also considered important by a
large proportion of respondents, the profile of results
being quite similar with the data provided in the case
of expensive products. This similarity is also
preserved in the evolution of percentages for the
situation of a product with a medium lifetime and for
a product with a short lifetime. Interestingly, in this
last situation, the shopper is specifically interested to
in the capacity of the shopping agent to provide the
best price offer, indicating that the shopping
decision might be determined by the level of price.
The answers provided are particularly interesting in
the situation when the shopper has a very short time
to find desired product and to conduct the
transaction. In this case, all the five quality
characteristics are indicated as highly important by a
very large proportion of respondents. The
percentages are decreasing progressively when the
customer has more time to conclude the transaction,
which creates better conditions for a thorough
information search and comparison of various
available offers.
5 CONCLUDING REMARKS
Despite the increased importance of shopping agents
for the development of online consumer markets and
transactions, the existing literature has not yet
considered the specific quality characteristics of
shopping agents, as they are perceived by the users,
in relation to their personal profile and the specific
circumstances of various transactions.
The study has a number of limitations, determined
by its exploratory approach. The sample of
respondents is relatively small, and the data
provided was analysed at a superficial level. The
focus of this project was more to understand what
are the perceived quality dimensions of the online
shopping agents, and what are the factors that
influence this perception (personal and
transactional), and not to find out why the
respondents are perceiving a specific way the quality
of e-shopping agents. This empirical dimension
requires further research, in which the statistical
analysis of quantitative data has to be complemented
by a qualitative approach, which can provide a better
understanding of the way in which online customers
interact with shopping agents.
REFERENCES
Rowley, J. (2002). ‘Window’ shopping and browsing
opportunities in cyberspace, Journal of Consumer
Behaviour, 1, 4, 369-378.
Rowley, J. (2000). Product search in e-shopping: a review
and research propositions. Journal of Consumer
Marketing, 17, 1, 20-35.
Iyer, G., & Pazgal, A. (2003). Internet Shopping Agents:
Virtual Co-Location and Competition. Marketing
Science, 22, 1, 85-106.
Sen, R., King, R.C., & Shaw, M.J. (2006). Buyers’ Choice
of Online Search Strategy and Its Managerial
Implications. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 23, 1, 211-238.
Rowley, J. (2000). Product searching with shopping bots.
Internet Research: Electronic Networking
Applications and Policy, 10, 3, 203-214.
Guttman, R.H., Moukas, A.G., & Maes, P. (1998). Agents
as mediators in electronic commerce. International
Journal of Electronic Markets, 8, 1, 22-27.
Sproule, S., & Archer, N. (2000). A buyer behaviour
framework for the development and design of software
agents in e-commerce. Internet Research: Electronic
Networking Applications and Policy, 10, 5, 396-405.
Cooke, A.D.J., Sujan, H., Sujan, M., & Weitz, B.A.
(2002). Marketing the Unfamiliar: The Role of
Context and Item-Specific Information in Electronic
Agent Recommendations. Journal of Marketing
Research, 39, 4, 488-497.
ICEIS 2008 - International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
210