CASE ON MODELING OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BY MODIFIED IDEF0 TECHNIQUE

Vladimír Modrák

2008

Abstract

The paper is concerned with a process management from the point of view of business process mapping. It is focused on methodological aspects of business process modeling leading to development map of processes with consistent linkages between all hierarchical levels. Used approach is directed at support of managing processes that flow across departments and/or functions within the organization. Developed process mapping technique is based on process decomposition that is resulting in a set of business structure models, which are represented by diagrams.

References

  1. Reijers, H. A., 2002. Design and control of workflow processes: business process management for the service industry. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
  2. Peppard, J., Rowland, P., 1995. The Essence of Business Process Re-engineering. Prentice Hall, New York.
  3. Sharp, A., McDermott, P.,2001. Workflow Modeling: Tools for Process Improvement and Application Development. Artech House Publishers, Boston.
  4. Taylor, J. C., 1998. Participative design: linking BPR and SAP with an STS approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Vol. 11 (3) pp. 233-245.
  5. Davenport, H. T., 1995. Will Participative Makeovers of Business Processes Succeed Where Reengineering Failed? Planning Review, January 1995, p. 24.
  6. Hammer, M., Champy, J., 1993. Reengineering the Corporation; A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York.
  7. Hansen, G., 1994. Automating Business Process Reengineering: Using the Power of Visual Simulation Strategies to Improve Performance and Profit. Prentice Hall, New York.
  8. Champlin, B., 2007. The Future of Services Engineering. BPM Strategies Magazine, July 2007.
  9. Modrák, V., 2005. Business Process Improvement through Optimization of its Structural Properties. In: Fischer, L. (ed.): Workflow Handbook 2005. Future Strategies., Book Division Lighthouse Point, FL, USA, pp. 75- 90.
  10. Hommes, B. J., 2005. Evaluating Conceptual Coherence in Multi-Modeling Techniques. In: Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group Publishing, USA, pp. 43-62.
  11. Mayer, R.J., Painter, M., and deWitte, P., 1992. IDEF family of methods for concurrent engineering and business reengineering applications, Knowledge Based Systems, Inc.: College Station, TX.
  12. Lind, M., 2005. Contextual Understanding of Information Systems -Characteristics of Process Oriented Information Systems. In: Campbell B., Underwood J., Bunker D. (Eds.) Proceeding of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2005), University of Technology, Sydney
  13. FIPS, 1983. Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Modrák V. (2008). CASE ON MODELING OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BY MODIFIED IDEF0 TECHNIQUE . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-38-8, pages 306-310. DOI: 10.5220/0001711203060310


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis08,
author={Vladimír Modrák},
title={CASE ON MODELING OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BY MODIFIED IDEF0 TECHNIQUE},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2008},
pages={306-310},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001711203060310},
isbn={978-989-8111-38-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - CASE ON MODELING OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BY MODIFIED IDEF0 TECHNIQUE
SN - 978-989-8111-38-8
AU - Modrák V.
PY - 2008
SP - 306
EP - 310
DO - 10.5220/0001711203060310