data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24463/24463ee528de50f31cb34e8feff50eb2fa19c705" alt=""
life. Although customers were asked about the
willingness to pay for the services, more realistic
long term pilot should be conducted to find out real
business potential of the services. Secondly, the
selection of pilot participants was mainly based on
the customers’ own eagerness. For example in the
SmartParking case, the user segment of pilot
customers was mainly restricted to frequent parkers.
However, it would be important to know how
customers who need parking services less frequently
experience the service. Hence, future research
should pay focus on different customer segments
and their willingness to adopt NFC services.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was done in the SmartTouch
(www.smarttouch.org) project (ITEA 05024), which
is a project within ITEA 2 (Information Technology
for European Advancement), a EUREKA strategic
cluster programme. The SmartTouch project has
been partly funded by Tekes, the Finnish Funding
Agency for Technology and Innovation.
REFERENCES
Anokwa, Y., Borriello, G., Pering T. & Want, R. 2007. A
user interaction model for NFC enabled applications.
In Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on
Pervasive Computing and Communications
Workshops, 357–361.
Balaban, D., 2007 NFC: Ready to Roll? Card Technology
Today. 12(3).
Bouwman, H., Carlsson, C., Molina-Castillo, F., Walden,
P. 2007 Barriers and Drivers in the Adoption of
Current and Future Mobile Services in Finland.
Telematics and Informatics 24.
Calvet, J.C., 2005 The Role of RFID in the Mobile Phone.
Teletronik. 3(4).
Carlsson, C., Hyvönen, K., Repo, P., Walden, P., 2005
Asynchronous Adoption Patterns of Mobile Services.
In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer
Society Press.
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of
use, and user acceptance of information technology.
MIS Quartely:13/1989, 319-339.
Heijden, H., Valiente, P., 2002 The Value of Mobility for
Business Process Performance: Evidence from
Sweden and the Netherlands. In ECIS 2002.
Häikiö, J., Isomursu, M., Matinmikko, T., Wallin, A.,
Ailisto, H., Huomo, T., 2007 Touch-based user
interface for elderly users. In Proceedings of
MobileHCI, Singapore.
Jaring, P., Törmänen, V., Siira, E., and Matinmikko, T.,
2007 Improving Mobile Solution Workflows and
Usability Using Near Field Communication
Technology. In Proceedings of the European
Conference on Ambient Intelligence 2007, Darmstadt,
Germany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 358-
373.
Kaasinen, E. 2005. User acceptance of mobile services –
value, ease of use, trust and ease of adoption. Espoo:
VTT Publications 566. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/
pdf/publications/2005/P566.pdf
Kargin, B., Basoglu, N., 2006 Adoption Factors of Mobile
Services. In ICMB’06 International Conference on
Mobile Business.
Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E., Thorbjornsen, H., 2005
Intentions to Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and
Cross-Service Comparisons. Journal of the Academy
of Marketing Services 33(3).
Riekki, J., Salminen, T., Alakärppä, I., 2006 Requesting
Pervasive Services by Touching RFID Tags. Pervasive
Computing. 5(1).
Rogers, E., 1995 Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press.
New York, 5
th
edition.
Rukzio, E., Leichtenstern, K., Callaghan, V., Holleis, P.,
Schmidt, A., Chin, J., 2006 An Experimental
Comparison of Physical Mobile Interaction
Techniques: Touching, pointing and scanning. In
Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006, The 8th
International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing.
LNCS, vol. 4206, Springer, Heidelberg.
Välkkynen, P., Niemelä, M., Tuomisto, T. 2006
Evaluating Touching and Pointing with a Mobile
Terminal for Physical Browsing. In NordiCHI 2006:
Changing Roles.
ICE-B 2008 - International Conference on e-Business
254