To recap, we should look for a new set of ‘more intrinsic’ features F
t
that should be
enough simple and, at the same time, capturing essential information about the struc-
tures.
To obtain these new kind of features, global information about the structures can be ex-
tracted from the properties function, without introducing any problem-specific model.
For example, one may consider the property spectrum, that is, by definition, the prob-
ability density functions (PDF) of a given component of the property function P
α
t
(·).
This function captures how the property is globally distributed; thus, comparison of dif-
ferent property spectra is directly feasible; to reduce dimensionality, moreover, it could
be effective to compute the momenta of the PDF (mean, variance,. . . ).
However, properties spectrum does not convey any information at all about regional
distribution of the property. In clinical applications, this is a drawback which cannot
be ignored: actually a small highly abnormal region may not affect appreciably the
property spectrum, but its clinical relevance is, usually, not negligible. Hence, spatial
distribution of properties has to be analyzed. One approach would be to estimate mul-
tidimensional property spectrum [15]. In this way, we may implicitly encode spatial
relationship between different kind of features. For example, considering the cords go-
ing from the center of mass of a structure to its boundary, we may use the cord length
and orientation as a property function defined on the structure boundary. Then, the as-
sociated multidimensional PDF implicitly codifies the elongation axis of the structure.
A major issue in dealing with such sort of multidimensional shape distributions is the
accurate estimation of the PDF. Some methods, based on the fast Gauss transform, have
been reported [16]. Although, this approach may be conceivable for general-purpose
3D structure indexing and retrieval, it has low relevance in medical applications, for
the too implicit encoding and the scarce characterization capabilities of local abnormal
regions. In the same vein, approaches which do not need a refined model of the struc-
ture (e.g., Gaussian image, spherical harmonics, Gabor spherical wavelets and other
general purposes shape descriptors used for content-based image retrieval) may be suit-
able. However, in general one should define a model of the structures (whose primitives
-elementary bricks- are regions, patches or landmarks) and then propagate it to the set
of instances to be analyzed by using matching techniques. It is then possible to consider
the average of a property on regions or patches (or its the value in a landmark) as a good
feature, since comparisons between averages on homologous regions can be performed
straightforwardly.
Following this recipe, a vector of features F
t
with the desired properties is obtained
for each phase of the cycle. The deforming structure is then described by the dynamics
of the temporal sequence of feature vectors obtained at different phases of the deforma-
tion cycle.
A further fruitful feature transformation may be performed exploiting our assump-
tions on deformable structures. Indeed, the smoothness of deformations implies that a
structure has mainly low frequency excited deformation modes. We extend this slightly
assuming that this holds true also for the features lists (F
t
)
1≤t≤T
. We assume that the
fundamental frequency of the motion is also the main component of each feature tracked
on time. With these assumptions, an obvious choice is given by the Fourier transform,
followed by a low pass filter, which supplies a new features vector Θ.
4444