2 SHORT REVIEW
Since the early days of anesthesia, several clinical
signs have been used for LOC assessment, such as
pupil diameter, sweat or tears production, heart rate
and muscular tone (Strickland and Drummond,
2001). Nowadays, in the clinical setting, LOC is
usually identified as the moment when the patient
looses the eyelash reflex or stops responding to
specific commands (proper name calling or tapping
in the forehead) or stimuli (pressing a button every
time they see a red light), which are very imprecise
and dependent on patient’s collaboration. These
methods have several disadvantages: assessment of
lack of response to name calling and mechanical
stimulus require the patient to be frequently
stimulated, so anesthesia induction cannot be smooth
and quiet; also any method based on a voluntary act
by the patient often fails because patients loose
critical judgement before losing consciousness.
In the last two decades, brain monitoring
techniques have been developed to assess the
hypnotic state of the patients. They were designed to
reflect real-time electrical activity of brain cells but
were not specifically created for LOC detection. In
clinical practice, they are used in combination with
clinical signs to provide as much information as
possible about the level of consciousness of the
patients.
Among all the developed indices, the Bispectral
Index (BIS) (Kelley, 2003) is the most well-known
and broadly used. It processes electrical activity
(electroencephalographic signal, EEG) detected in
the forehead by means of electrodes and shows a
value, from 0 to 100, which indicates the level of
hypnosis: 0 is associated to absence of electrical
activity and 100 corresponds to the awake state. The
BIS system uses a proprietary algorithm, based on
bispectral analysis, which performs amplification,
digitalisation and signal processing of EEG in order
to obtain the above mentioned index.
The BIS signal and the electromyopraphy of the
frontal muscle, produced spontaneously and also
acquired with the BIS unit, were the subject of a
clinical study presented in this paper, where their
relationship with the exact moment of LOC was also
analyzed.
3 CLINICAL STUDY
3.1 Patients and Methods
Adult patients scheduled for neurosurgical
procedures were studied during induction of general
anesthesia. Patients were monitored according to the
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
standards. BIS was also monitored in all patients. A
XP-Quattro sensor was applied to the forehead and
ASPECT A2000 or VISTA monitors were used. BIS
and EMG were recorded every 5 seconds using
Rugloop software. Anesthesia was induced with
Remifentanil (an opioid analgesic) and Propofol (an
hypnotic) administered intra-venously by Target
Controlled Infusion (TCI) using Rugloop software
and Asena pumps. During induction, LOC was
determined as the moment when patients failed to
open their eyes following name calling and a tap on
the forehead at every 15 seconds. The moment of
LOC was recorded for every patient.
BIS and EMG values collected during induction
were analyzed, as well as the moment of LOC. In
order to find another possible indicator of
consciousness on the BIS and EMG signals, the
moment when a significant fall in BIS and EMG
values occurred was assessed. Both signals were
processed using Matlab®. First, a moving average
filter of 11 samples was applied to the acquired
signals aiming to smooth them, and afterwards its
first derivative was analyzed. The minimum
derivative value corresponds to the abrupt fall
observed in the signals.
Once the falls were detected, we defined two
new variables: the difference of time between LOC
clinical detection and the moment when the falls in
BIS and EMG occurred (δ
BIS
and δ
EMG
respectively).
3.2 Results
We studied 69 patients of both genders; age was
51.5±14.7 years, height was 164.1±9.9 cm and
weight was 69.7±13.3 kg. The patients underwent
cranial or spinal surgeries.
BIS at LOC was 69,52±15,86 and EMG at LOC
was 42,04±7,60 dB (table 1). Typical tracings for
BIS and EMG trends during induction are shown in
figure 1.
BIOSIGNALS 2009 - International Conference on Bio-inspired Systems and Signal Processing
312