Figure 3: Module current measurement.
2.2.3 Network Operation Tests
We have tested the packet error rate by considering
just one end device transmitting a 2-byte payload
data frame to the coordinator. Five runs were
executed involving the transmission of a total of
40,000 packets at different intervals. No packet was
lost in any run but we have observed packets
retransmissions during the longer tests probably due
to interference from Wi-Fi traffic. The number of
packets that required retransmission in each run is
shown on Table 1. The results confirm the
satisfactory coexistence between ZigBee and Wi-Fi
networks.
Table 1: Transmission test results.
Interval between
packets
Number of retransmitted packets in
each run
1 2 3 4 5
100 ms 6 5 6 0 0
20 ms 1 0 0 0 0
10 ms 0 0 0 0 0
5 ms 0 0 0 0 0
A second test was performed using five ZigBee
modules to simulate a small ZigBee star network.
Four modules were used as end devices to gather
and transmit ECG signals using the unslotted
CSMA/CA mode. Every 250 ms a 45-byte payload
data packet was sent to the fifth module, which was
programmed to perform as the network coordinator.
It also checks if any data packet from any end device
is lost and reports it. Ten runs involving the
transmission of at least 2400 packets by all four end
devices were executed. No packet was lost in any
run, which can be considered a promising result.
3 CONCLUSIONS
Wireless sensor networks promise ubiquitous vital
signal monitoring that might completely transform
the way health care is provided.
We have proposed a system that facilitates vital
signal gathering in a hospital environment for what
we call extended health visibility. Instead of
collecting vital signals only a few times along the
day, healthcare professionals will have access to
continuous patient records which will provide
several improvements compared to current
capabilities. Power consumption estimation and
measurements, as well as network performance test
results were discussed. These preliminary results
seem to validate the potential applicability of the
proposed system for the intended application.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been supported by the Portuguese
Foundation for Science and Technology and the
POCTI and FEDER programs.
REFERENCES
Cypher, D., Chevrollier, N., Montavont, N., & Golmie, N.
(2006). Prevailing over wires in healthcare
environments: benefits and challenges. Comm.
Magazine, IEEE, 44(4), 56-63.
Fulford-Jones, T. R. F., Gu-Yeon, W., & Welsh, M.
(2004). A portable, low-power, wireless two-lead EKG
system. IEMBS '04. 26th Annual International
Conference of the IEEE.
IEEE Std 802.15.4-2003—IEEE Standard for Information
Technology —Part 15.4, (2003).
Jennic. (2007). Application Note JN-AN-1001-1v3
Calculating JN5121 Power Consumption.
Jennic. (2008). Product Brief – JN5139-xxx-Myy
IEEE802.15.4/ZigBee Module Family.
Lorincz, K., Malan, D. J., Fulford-Jones, T. R. F., Nawoj,
A., Clavel, A., Shnayder, V., et al. (2004). Sensor
networks for emergency response: challenges and
opportunities. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 3(4), 16-23.
O'Donoughue, N., Kulkarni, S., & Marzella, D. (2006).
Design and Implementation of a Framework for
Monitoring Patients in Hospitals Using Wireless
Sensors in Ad Hoc Configuration. 28th IEEE EMBS
Annual International Conference
Pavlopoulos, S., Kyriacou, E., Berler, A., & Koutsouris,
D. (1998). A mobile system for emergency health care
provision via telematics support-AMBULANCE,
Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine,
1998. ITAB 98. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International
Conference on (pp. 150-154).
Tia, G., Greenspan, D., Welsh, M., Juang, R. R., & Alm,
A. (2005). Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient
Tracking Over a Wireless Network, Engineering in
Medicine and Biology Society, 2005. IEEE-EMBS
2005. 27th Annual International Conference of the
(pp. 102-105).
ZigBee Alliance Document 053474r17, ZigBee
Specification, v. 1.0 r17, (2007).
EXTENDED HEALTH VISIBILITY IN THE HOSPITAL ENVIRONMENT
425