The orientation of the present works is intended
to develop medical devices less painful and that
offer a higher potential screening of a larger number
of diseases in newborns, replacing technology
currently used.
The context of the study, together with the
evaluation of pain during the blood collection
gesture is presented in section 2. Section 3 deals
with the study of a painless micro-needles array
meant to replace the classical lancet. In section 3, we
present a device developed to obtain blood without
successive pressures on the newborn's heel.
Furthermore, this system can be used to efficiently
deposit the collected blood on the cardboard blotter.
Then, a conclusion and some perspectives will be
proposed at the end of this manuscript.
2 CONTEXT AND PAIN
EVALUATION
Screenings are achieved by nurses on the third day
of life. They require the use of an automatic, sterile
and disposable lancet that pierces the skin of the
heel. The heel is then pressed to obtain droplets of
blood that are collected on circles drawn on a
cardboard blotter (as seen on figure 1). Since the
blood flow is not sufficient, successive manual
pressures to the heel are required. Circles on the card
must be completely filled and the blood must cross
the card (this is not the case for all the circles in
figure 1). If the first attempt does not give enough
blood, a second is made on the same heel or on the
other one. In the same way, if the droplets do not
cross the screening card it is necessary to add blood.
This tracking is recognised as painful.
Newborns feel more or less pain during the
blood sampling gesture. Pain can be estimated using
various behavioural scales (Destuynder, 1991),
(Uyan, 2008). Both D.A.N. (Douleur Aiguë du
Nouveau-Né, Newborn Intense Pain ) and E.D.I.N.
(Echelle de Douleur et d’Inconfort du Nouveau-Né,
Newborn Pain and Discomfort Scale) scales are
adapted to the evaluation of newborn's pain. We
used the D.A.N. scale because it is more specific to
intense pain. It allows quoting three criteria: the
facial answer, the movements of the members and
the vocal answer. Each criterion is quoted either
between 0 and 3 or between 0 and 4. We evaluated
the pain at five different moments: before the
gesture, when the nurse takes the baby's heel, during
the lancet sting, when the nurse presses the heel and
after the gesture.
For a first analysis, we observed 55 children for
which 58 stings were needed. Indeed, no blood was
obtained in 3 cases at the first attempt.
Figure 1: Actual blood sampling technique (top) and
cardboard blotter used to collect blood.
The gesture proving to be painful for a majority
of children, we refined our study at three moments:
the taking of the heel, the sting, the pressing of the
heel. The results obtained showed that the taking of
the heel is not painful (only 1 case). The sting is
painful in 10 cases, what nearly represents 25 % of
the cases. The pressing of the heel is the most
painful moment (26 cases representing 68%).
Therefore, we oriented our works toward two
new systems of blood sampling. The first one is a
micro-needles array meant to reduce the pain during
the sting (in replacement of the lancet). The second
one is used after the heel has been stung with the
lancet. It is designed to collect enough blood without
any pressure on the heel. Moreover, this system
leads to a perfect impregnation of the cardboard
blotter.
3 MICRO-NEEDLES ARRAY
The goal of this work is to estimate the geometry a
micro-needles array used to collect blood at the
newborn's heel. This array should replace the lancet.
The goal is to penetrate the newborn's heel and to let
blood flow in the holes of the micro-needles by
capillarity. In a final version, a tank should be
designed to store the sampled blood. Various studies
concerning micro-needles have been published, but
PAIN AND EFFICIENCY IN NEONATAL BLOOD SAMPLE SCREENINGS - New Devices for Reducing Pain and
Improving Blood Sample Quality
291