“default” goal for each user is to succeed in
answering correctly the questions of each test. In our
example we assume that the difficulty level of the
test is high and the student has already answered a
couple of questions correctly. At this point in
accordance with the system’s incorporated OCC
model the student is pleased that s/he has answered
correctly the previous questions and is also
experiencing hope that s/he will continue answering
correctly. The corresponding intensity variables for
this event are illustrated in table 1 as “many
consecutive correct answers (related to a specific
test)” and “user takes a test concerning a new part of
the theory”. The second variable indicates that
succeeding in such a test is difficult, thus can invoke
admiration by the pedagogical persona. The user’s
hope of continuing to answer correctly may then be
encouraged by the pedagogical persona by
expressing admiration for the student’s success and
encouraging her/him to continue answering
successfully. In this case the student has a “goal” for
answering correctly. If the student continues her/his
successful course the pedagogical persona will
express happiness, by saying something in a “happy
voice” and/or by smiling or doing a positive gesture.
4 CONCLUSIONS
This paper has described an educational authoring
tool that incorporates the OCC theory in order to
create tutoring personas with emotion expression
facilities. Based on each student’s interaction, goals,
achievements and mistakes, the system proposes an
emotional state for the tutoring persona as a tactic in
supporting the educational process. In this way, the
tutoring personas that are speaking, animated
characters may represent the teaching behavior of
the human instructor who is in charge of the remote
lessons. Students, who are going to use the
educational applications, will have a user interface
that is more human-like and affective. Thus they
may feel less deprived of the human-human
interaction between them and a human teacher that
would take place in the settings of a real classroom
and get motivated for the purpose of learning more
efficiently and also more enjoyable.
It is among our future plans to evaluate the
system in order to examine the degree of usefulness
of the authoring tool for the instructors, as well as
the degree of usefulness and user-friendliness for the
students who are going to use the educational
system.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Support for this work was provided by the General
Secretariat of Research and Technology, Greece,
under the auspices of the PENED-2003 program.
REFERENCES
Brusilovsky, P., 1999. Adaptive and Intelligent
Technologies for Web-based Education. In C.
Rollinger and C. Peylo (eds.), Künstliche Intelligenz
(4), Special Issue on Intelligent Systems and
Teleteaching,19-25.
Elliott, C., Rickel, J., Lester, J., 1999. Lifelike pedagogical
agents and affective computing: An exploratory
synthesis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1600,
pp. 195-212.
Goleman, D., 1995. Emotional Intelligence, Bantam
Books: New York.
Johnson, W. L, J. Rickel, and Lester, J., 2000. Animated
Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in
Interactive Learning Environments. International
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 11,
pp. 47-78.
Lester, J., Converse, S., Kahler, S., Barlow, S., Stone, B.,
and Bhogal, R. 1997. The Persona Effect: affective
impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Pemberton
S. (Ed.) Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’
97, Conference Proceedings, ACM Press, pp. 359-
366,.
Ortony, A., Clore, G., Collins, A. 1990. The cognitive
structure of emotions, Cambridge University Press.
Rist, T., André, E. and Müller, J. 1997. Adding Animated
Presentation Agents to the Interface. In Proceedings of
the 1997 International Conference on Intelligent User
Interfaces (eds. J. Moore, E. Edmonds & A. Puerta),
79-86. ACM Press, New York.
Soldato, D, Boulay, D., 1995. Implementation of
motivational tactics in tutoring systems. Journal of
Artificial Intelligence in Education 6 (4), pp. 337-378.
WEBIST 2009 - 5th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
426