suggestions were put together. Each teacher
established a communication forum with her tutors
in order to make the socialization of ideas among
everyone possible.
If technical problems were identified in the
platform (student without access, unavailable
resources, corrupted files etc.), they were forwarded
to the Technologic Coordination of The Distance
Education Center. Besides, students could rely on a
tech support in order to solve doubts concerning the
Meeting Point.
According to the learning theory adopted and
considering the student as a subject in constant
process of knowledge construction, assessment was
put in service of such process. The assessment
system proposed was a formative one and aimed at
identifying potential learning difficulties, as well as
positive aspects of students’ development.
Formative assessment exerts a control function in
the process, privileging results along the process in a
way to allow a reflexive action, by the part of both
teacher and student, in the construction and
reconstruction of knowledge. Assessment, in this
context, is an activity aimed at providing support for
learning and knowledge (Álvarez Méndez, 2002;
Libâneo, 1994).
As assessment can be defined, according to such
conception, as a decision making process based on
the interpretation of data provided by the student,
taking also into consideration its subjective aspect, it
was necessary to apply varied instruments in order
to collect those data in an attempt to evaluate as
accurately as possible the student performance along
the course.
Thus, at the end of each unity, students filled in
an activity control check list, indicating whether it
was accomplished, whether it was finished before
the deadline and how it helped in the development of
the competences.
Through graded activities (in a total of seven),
students were stimulated to engage in the practical
tasks focused on the familiarization with the
platform tools.
At the end of the course, students carried out a
self-assessment, during which they had the
opportunity to review their own trajectories
throughout the course and point out positive and
negative aspects of the general structure of the
Welcome Module.
In this perspective, assessment becomes
dissociate from the concept of an excluding practice
and, thus, from stereotyped ideas such as “to
evaluate someone is to measure one’s behavior
through tests”. In a more progressive conception, to
which our approach is related, assessment is a two-
way process, optimizing both students’ learning and
teachers’ didactic actions.
An evaluation of the Welcome Module was also
performed by the students involved in the course.
Aspects such as didactic material, technology,
methodology, student support and guidance, and
learning assessment were analyzed through a
multiple choice survey. Also, students were invited
to write about their experience with the module.
These data have not been analyzed yet and will be
presented in future works.
We understand that promoting collective
learning moments is central to a well-succeeded
educational process. If meanings cannot be given,
but discovered, maybe our task is to create
conditions for this to happen. Regardless of the
educational modality (local or remote), students,
teachers and tutors must be given the same
opportunities to express themselves, thus
overcoming the transmission pedagogy logic.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The experience with the Welcome Module leads us
into believing that to learn in the logic of DE, in
different times and spaces, is the challenge of this
century. It is a key task for institutions engaged in
DE to aid students in order to favor their network
communication.
Some resources are presented as shortcuts to the
optimization of learning. In a DE course, efficiency
and frequency in the usage of the resources available
in the platform (in this case, Moodle) are very
important for both interaction and
individual/collective knowledge construction. The
environment alone is useless. The participants are
the ones to make it work, with different opinions,
varied writing styles and other human singularities.
Turn what is strange into something familiar in the
DE context was one of the objectives of the
Welcome Module. In this sense, the potentiality of
web 2.0 transformed students from consumers into
producers of contents through blogs, wikis and
relationship software, reducing what Moore (1993)
and Moore and Kearsley (2007) call Transitional
Distance. We advanced towards that Lèvy (1993,
1999) defines as collective intelligence construction.
The technologies available at each historic
moment influence society and, particularly,
education. Hence, it is important to deploy such
technological resources pedagogically, in order to
promote high quality DE initiatives. This paper
CSEDU 2009 - International Conference on Computer Supported Education
90