Rule. This column is used to define when
performance of the activity requires that one or more
rules must be fulfilled. Rule is a precise statement
that defines a constraint, which must be satisfied in
order for a certain activity to be executed.
Input/Output.
This column is used to indicate
which inputs or outputs are connected with the
activity described.
Cost
. This column is the sum of the costs of the
resources needed to accomplish an activity. This
parameter is used to calculate the cost of work and
business processes and therefore is important in
improving business processes.
Developing the activity and property tables is an
iterative process. Some of the interviews have to be
repeated to arrive at a precise understanding of the
user’s work. If anything is misunderstood, then we
have to organize new interviews with the responsible
users until everything is clear.
Surgery. Because of space limitations, only ten
activities defined in the activity table are described
in detail in the property table, Table 1. The values
shown in the column Time in Table 1 are
approximate values obtained from the medical staff.
Unfortunately, we could not get any information
concerning the costs of the listed activities from the
management of the hospital.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The aim of this paper was to introduce a technique,
which enables the analyst to overcome problems of
business process modelling.
Business process modelling is solved
successfully by developing the activity table
technique, which requires that each activity,
identified in the framework of the process, has to be
linked with its resource and its successor activity.
This is achieved by using horizontal and vertical
linkages. Connecting the activities to their
performers (resources) represents a new dimension
in process modelling, which contribute a great deal
in leading the modeller to identify the activities as
the occur in the real world and to develop a process
model that represents a true reflection of reality of
the business process discussed.
Such a model enables us to continue with
business process improvement, which is carried on
by analyzing the activity table. This table could be
divided the table into clear, manageable, and easy to
understand subtables. Analysing is essential in
discovering improvements, removing obstacles,
shortening time, reducing cost, and solving other
problems of the business process discussed.
REFERENCES
Ackerman, F., Walls, L., Meer, R., Boorman, M. (1999).
Taking a Strategic View of BPR to Develop a
Multidisciplinary Framework. Journal of Operational
Research Society, 195-204.
Aguilar-Saven, R. (2001). Business Process Modelling
techniques and tools. Department of Production
Economics, WP291 Linkoping Sweden.
Aguilar-Saven, R. (2003). Business Process Modeling.
Review and Framework. International Journal of
Production Economics, Vol. 90, No. 2, 129–149.
Aguilar-Saven, R., Olhager, J. (2002). Integration of
Product, Process and Functional Orientations.
Principles and a Case Study. Preprints of the
International Conference on Advanced Production
Management Systems, APMS 2002 IFIP The
Netherlands September.
Anapindi, R., Chopra, S., Deshmukh, S. D., van Mieghem,
J.A., Zemel, E. (1999). Managing Business Process
Flows. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pretence Hall.
Armistead, C.G., Rowland, P. (1996). Managing Business
Processes: BPR and Beyond. Chichester John Wiley &
Sons.
Chan, M. (2002). A Framework to Develop an Enterprise
Information Portal for Contract Manufacturing.
International Journal of Production Economics, 75
(1–2), 113–126.
Damij, T. (2000). An Object-Oriented Methodology for
Information Systems Development and Business
Process Reengineering. Journal of Object-Oriented
Programming, Vol. 13, No. 4, 23-34.
Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation:
Reengineering Work through Information Technology,
Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Davenport, T.H., Short, J. (1990). The New Industrial
Engineering: Information Technology and Business
Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31
No. 4, 11–27.
Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don’t
automate. Obliterate. Harvard Business Review, Vol.
68 No. 4, 104–112.
Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the
Corporation, A Manifesto for Business Revolution.
New York, USA.
Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.TC., Guha, S. (1997). Business
Process Change: A Study of Methodologies,
Techniques and Tools. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, 55-80.
Martinez, M., et al. (2001). Virtual Enterprise –
Organisation, Evolution and Control. International
Journal of Production Economics, 74 (1 – 3), 225–
238.
Laguna, M, Marklund, J. (2005). Business Process
Modeling, Simulation, and Design. Pearson Education
Inc., New Jersey.
Watson H.G. (1994). Business Systems Engineering.
Managing Breakthrough Changes for Productivity and
Profit. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
AN EFFECTIVE PROCESS MODELLING TECHNIQUE
303