ISP is a necessary precursor to ISD, since it provides
a long-term vision, by identifying the potential
systems and defining a full set of management
policies and approaches. It is assumed that ISP is
integrated and aligned with the business planning,
being therefore a planning strength for
organizational change, provided by ISD, since a new
system frequently implies a new form of
organization.
In order to support the needs of the organization
as time elapses, IS must adapt to the naturally
occurring changes. In this sense, it is possible to
consider a cyclical and continuous sequence of ISF
activities: the several activities feed each other in
each system generation, and possess strong
interlinks.
It is possible to consider a logical sequence of
activities, under which an IS is thought-over (in the
scope of ISP), produced (in the scope of ISD), and
then used (in the scope of ISE). However, in practice
these activities take place concurrently, with
significant inter-relationships and interdependences;
and these relationships are strongly interactive. The
several activities cannot be approached in isolation;
they must be taken in account and integrated
together.
There are multiple propositions for ISP, ISD,
ISE, and ISM, each involving several activities
(Kendall and Kendall, 1992) and denominations
(Martin et al., 1994). It is somewhat hard to come
across two authors agreeing in detail over the same
proposition (Sager, 1990). However, in spite of all
variations, their nature is mostly similar. Table 1
presents those activities that met major
dissemination and are most commonly accepted for
the ISF.
Table 1: ISF activities. Source: (Varajão, 2002).
Groups of activities Activities
ISP IS Strategy analysis
IS Strategy definition
IS Strategy implementation
ISD System analysis
System design
System development
System deployment
System maintenance
ISE System operation
IT management
Human resources management
Procurement of services and
resources
Other, diversified activities
ISM Organization and control
To support the ISF activities there are several
tools, as identified in a previous study (Trigo et al.,
2008a): Sarbannes-Oxley Act (SOX), Basel II,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA), IT Balanced Scorecard, Return On
Investment (ROI), Total Cost of Ownership (TCO),
Earned Value Analysis (EVA), Enterprise Risk
Management - Integrated Framework (COSO),
Control Objectives for Information and related
Technology (CobiT), Project Management Body of
Knowledge (PMBoK), PRojects IN Controlled
Environments (PRINCE2), Capability Maturity
Model® Integration (CMMI), Software Process
Improvement and Capability dEtermination (Spice),
Six Sigma, ISO 9000, TickIT, ISO 27000,
Information Technology Infrastructure Library
(ITIL) with several software tools from IT vendors
sucha as System Center from Microsoft, HP
Openview from HP, Tivoli platform from IBM, etc.,
ISO 20000, enhanced Telecom Operations Map
(eTOM) and Business Process Management (BPM).
Beyond the CobiT framework, which must be
implemented on some software architecture, none of
the above tools covers all the ISF activities.
This is a problem because CIOs need a tool that
supports the management of the ISF activities in an
integrated way and not the sole management of each
one of them.
3 TISM
TISM stands for Tool for Information System
Management, and enables the management of ISF
based on the architectural vision of the ISF.
There are numerous propositions for the
definition of the IS architecture of an enterprise,
being one of the most widely used, the framework
proposed by Zachman (Zachman, 1987), which is
easy to understand and addresses the enterprise as a
whole being independently of tools or
methodologies, and any issues can be mapped
against it to understand where they fit (Lankhorst,
2005).
Our tool and respective conceptual model is not
an implementation of this framework, but it does
inherit the idea of the use of matrices to map the
different IT/IS elements, some of properties derived
from Zachman framework dimensions and the use of
perspectives looking at the organization IS
architecture and ISF.
Based on the this architectural vision of ISF, we
reached the conclusion that one best way to
implement a tool for ISF management would be
ICEIS 2009 - International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
304