2 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
Two types of experiments were carried out,
mentioned as Expa and Expc. Expa used Enterasys
RBTR2 level 2/3/4 access points (APa), with
firmware version 6.08.03 (Enterasys Networks,
2005), and 100-Base-TX/10-Base-T Allied Telesis
AT-8000S/16 level 2 switches (Allied Telesis,
2008). The radio cards were similar to the Agere-
Systems model 0118 type. The configuration was for
minimum transmitted power, micro cell, point-to-
point, LAN to LAN mode, using the radio card
antenna. Expc used Linksys WRT54GL wireless
routers (Linksys, 2005), with a Broadcom BCM5352
chip rev0, firmware DD-WRT v24-sp1-10011 (DD-
WRT, 2009) and the same type of level 2 switch.
The wireless mode was set to bridged access point.
In both Expa and Expc, interference free
communication channels were used. WEP
encryption was not activated. No power levels above
the minimum were required as the access points
were very close (30 cm).
Both types of experiments, Expa and Expc, were
made in point-to-point mode using the laboratory
setup shown in Figure 1. Measurements were made
using TCP and UDP communications at OSI level 4,
as mentioned in (Pacheco de Carvalho, 2008c),
permitting network performance results to be
recorded. For a TCP connection, TCP throughput
was obtained. For a UDP test with a given
bandwidth parameter, UDP throughput, jitter and
percentage loss of datagrams were obtained. TCP
packets and UDP datagrams of 1470 bytes size were
used. A window size of 8 kbytes and a buffer size of
the same value were used for TCP and UDP,
respectively. One PC, with IP 192.168.0.2 was the
Iperf server and the other, with IP 192.168.0.6, was
the Iperf client. Jitter, which can be seen as the
smooth mean of differences between consecutive
transit times, was continuously computed by the
server, as specified by RTP in RFC 1889. This
scheme was also used for FTP measurements, where
FTP server and client applications were installed in
the PCs with IPs 192.168.0.2 and 192.168.0.6,
respectively.
Batch command files were written to enable the
TCP, UDP and FTP tests. The results were obtained
in batch mode and written as data files to the client
PC disk.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Both APa and APc access points were configured,
for each standard IEEE 802.11 b, g, with several
fixed transfer rates. For every fixed transfer rate,
measurements were made, for both Expa and Expc.
In this way, for each experiment type, data were
obtained for comparison of the laboratory
performances of IEEE 802.11 b and 802.11g links,
measured namely at OSI levels 4 and 7 using the
scheme of Figure 1.
At OSI level 1 in both Expa and Expc we have
monitored, for every one of the cases, the signal to
noise ratios SNR of the point-to-point links.
For both Expa and Expc, and for every standard
and nominal fixed transfer rate, an average TCP
throughput was determined. This value was used as
the bandwidth parameter for every corresponding
UDP test, giving average jitter and average
percentage datagram loss. The results are shown in
Figures 2-7. In Figures 2-3, polynomial fits were
made namely for each AP implementation of IEEE
802.11 g. It is seen that the best TCP throughput
performances are, by descending order, for 802.11g
and 802.11b. In Expc (Figure 3), the data for 802.11
b,g are higher than the corresponding data in Expa
(Figure 2). In particular for 802.11g and TCP
throughput APc shows, on average, a 10 % better
performance than APa. In Figures 4-7, the data
points were joined by smoothed lines. In Expa
(Figure 4) jitter is, on average, higher for IEEE
802.11b (2.6 ms). In Expc (Figure 5) jitter is also, on
average, higher for IEEE 802.11b (2.1 ms). In both
Expa (Figure 6) and Expc (Figure 7), generally, the
percentage datagram loss data agree reasonably well
for both standards. They are 1.3 % and 1.4 %, on
average, respectively.
At OSI level 7, FTP transfer rates were measured
versus nominal transfer rates configured in the APs
for the IEEE 802.11 b,g standards. Every
measurement was the average for a single FTP
transfer, using a binary file size of 100 Mbytes. The
results thus obtained in Expa and Expc are
represented in Figures 8-9, respectively. Polynomial
fits to data were made. It was found that in both
cases the best performances were, by descending
order, for 802.11g and 802.11b. The FTP transfer
rates obtained in Expc, using both standards, were
higher than in Expa. This means that APc presents a
better FTP performance than APa. FTP results have
shown the same trends found for TCP throughput.
WINSYS 2009 - International Conference on Wireless Information Networks and Systems
96