exclusively e-learning programs and courses. as the
most appropriate for e-learning implementation.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Despite the move towards flexible learning
methodologies, the e-learning industry in Greece is
still immature and evolving. This study identifies
variables and factors that explain students’
involvement and perceptions towards the adoption
of a specific e-learning program, this of e-business
e-marketing course. The paper applied a number of
variables concerning e-learning issues, to a
representative population. As such the survey
contributes to the understanding of the requirements
of prospective Greek e-learners towards factors
associated with successful e-learning programs in a
dynamic virtual learning environment. Greek
students are revealed informed about e-learning
concept and its basic features. It is worth mentioning
that they seem to be devoted to traditional
educational process, demanding similar dimensions
from an e-learning program such as synchronous
model, blended learning, domestic language oriented
programs, state universities and public sector
accreditation.
On the whole, the paper underlines that the
implementation of e-learning programs is a
challenging task that incorporates organizational,
technological, administrative and instructional
aspects, involving also a fully understanding of
learners’ needs and demands. The findings of the
study provide a useful framework to the interested
educational entities, contributing to the development
of an efficient and effective e-learning marketing
strategy.
REFERENCES
Alexander, S., McKenzie, J., with Geissinger, H., 1998.
An Evaluation of Information Technology Projects for
University Learning. DEETYA, National Capital
Printing, 1998
Argyris, C. and Schon, D., 1978. Organisational
Learning: A Theory in Action Perspective, Reading.
Mass: Addison Wesley
Benigno, V., & Trentin, G. 2000. The evaluation of online
courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16,
259–270
Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T., 2006. Interaction in distance-
learning courses. Journal of the American Society
Information Science, 57(3), 299–305 and
Capper, J., 2001. E-learning growth and promise for the
developing world. TechKnowLogia, May/June.
Available at: http://www.techknowlo-gia.org
Retrieved July 20, 2007.
Clausen, S.-E., 1998. Applied Correspondence Analysis:
An Introduction. Sage University Papers Series on
Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-
121, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Dillon, C. L., & Guawardena, C. N., 1995. A framework
for the evaluation of telecommunications-based
distance education. Paper presented at the 17th
Congress of the International Council for Distance
Education, Open University, Milton Keynes.
Dixon, N., 1994. The Organisational Learning Cycle:
How Can We Learn Collectively?, McGraw-Hill,
Maidenhead
Dublin, L., 2004. The nine myths of e-learning
implementation: ensuring the real return on your e-
learning investment. Industrial and Commercial
Training, 36 (7), 291-294
Dutton, J., & Perry, J., 2002. How do online students
differ from lecture students?. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 18(4), 169–190.
Easterby-Smith, M., 1997. Disciplines of organizational
learning: contributions and critiques. Human
Relations., 50(9), 1085-1113
Epic survey report 2003. The future of e-learning.
Available at:
http://huveauxlearning.com/content/resources/white_p
apers/Epic_Survey2003.pdf. Retrieved May 25 2005
Evans, J. & Haase, I. 2001. Online business education in
the twenty-first century: an analysis of potential target
markets. Internet Research: Electronic Networking
Applications & Policy, 11(3), 246-260
Freund, Y. P., 1988. Critical success factors. Planning
Review, 16(4), 20–25.
Greenacre, M., 2007. Correspondence Analysis in
Practice. CRC,London, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman
&Hall.
Gordon, Y., Young, A. & Bal, J., 2003. External
environmental forces affecting e-learning providers.
Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21 (3), 168-172
Hampton, G., 1979. Students as Subjects in International
Behavioural Studies. Journal of International Business
Studies, 10 (2), 94-96
Ingram, H., Biermann, K., Cannon, J., Neil, J., & Waddle,
C., 2000. “nternalizing action learning: a company
perspective. Establishing critical success factors for
action learning courses. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(2), 107–
113
Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L., 1993. The information
age confronts education: case studies on electronic
classroom. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 24–
54.
Leonardo da Vinci project (2003). E-trainers, National
statement on e-learning in Greece. Available at
http://www2.spi.pt/e-trainers/documents/e-
Trainers_National%20Statement%20on%20e-
Learning_Greece.pdf. Retrieved September 12 2005
ICE-B 2009 - International Conference on E-business
236