reader. This is simply because the passive tag circuit
is energized from the RF signal broadcasted by the
reader. Hence, the RSS value in the tag circuitry is
more significant than that in the RFID reader.
The rest of the paper is outlined as follows. Some
of the most commonly used robot navigation and/or
localization systems are given in section 2. Section 3
describes the proposed RFID-based relative position-
ing architecture followed by fundamentals of RFID
system theory and its limitations. The RFID system
implementation is discussed in section 4 followed by
some real-time experimental results illustrated in sec-
tion 5. Finally, conclusions with some future research
avenue are drawn in section 6.
2 RELATED WORK
Mobile robot navigation and/or localization system
has been the subject of several studies. Among the
most common and popular navigation algorithms sug-
gested in the state of the art are dead-reckoning-based,
landmark-based, vision-based, behavior-based navi-
gation techniques. Each of these navigation tech-
niques has its own advantages and disadvantages, al-
though it is difficult to rate them objectively. How-
ever, some aspects can be unequivocally compared,
such as the computational complexity, the navigation
accuracy, or the amount of information a priori re-
quired for the proper operation of the algorithm.
The fundamental idea behind the dead-reckoning
navigation techniques is that they provide position,
heading, translational, and rotational velocities of
an autonomous mobile robot. These techniques are
widely used due to their simplicity and easy main-
tenance (D’Orazio et al., 1993). The shortcomings
of this technique is obviously that small precision er-
rors and sensor drifts inevitably lead to increasing
cumulative errors in the robot’s position and orien-
tation over time, unless an independent reference is
used periodically to correct the errors. As an alterna-
tive to dead-reckoning-based methods, natural or ar-
tificial landmarks have been used at various locations
in the environment in order to better estimate the posi-
tion of the mobile robot (Lin and Lal Tummala, 1997;
Yi and Choi, 2004). Nevertheless, a landmark-based
navigation strategy relies on identification and sub-
sequent recognition of distinct features or objects in
the environment that may be a priori known or ex-
tracted dynamically. Due to sensors noise and pos-
sible dynamic changes of the operating environment,
the recognition process of features or objects might
become quite challenging. Given the shortcomings
of the landmark-based techniques, some researchers
shifted their interest to vision-based navigation sys-
tems. Vision sensors can have wide field-of-view,
can have millisecond sampling rates, and can be eas-
ily used for trajectory planning (Desouza and Kak,
2002). Yet, some disadvantages of vision include lack
of depth information, image occlusion, low resolution
and the requirement for extensive data interpretation
(recognition). As the development of different au-
tonomous robot navigation techniques in real-world
environments constitutes one of the major trends in
current research on robotics, one important problem
is to cope with the large amount of uncertainty inher-
ited from natural environments. As such, soft com-
puting techniques have received a considerable at-
tention in recent years. Numerous navigation tech-
niques have been suggested in the state of the art us-
ing some tools of computational intelligence such as
fuzzy logic, neural network, neuro-fuzzy system, ge-
netic algorithm, or several combinations of them.
With these concerns in mind, several works have
considered localizing a mobile robot based on the ap-
plication of emerging RFID technology owing to its
wide availability, non-touch recognition system that
transmits and processes the information on events and
environments using a wireless frequency and small
chips. Since an RFID system can recognize at high-
speed and send data within various distances, the ap-
plication of RFID technology has been increased and
RFID systems have been applied for the robot tech-
nology recently (Kulyukin et al., 2004).
Hahnel et al. studied to improve the localization
with a pair of RFID antennas (Hahnel et al., 2004).
They presented a probabilistic measurement model
for RFID readers that allow them to accurately local-
ize the RFID tags in the environment.
In addition, robot’s position estimation techniques
can be classified as range-based and bearing-based.
The main idea behind range-based techniques is to tri-
laterate the robot’s position using some known refer-
ence points and the estimated distances at those points
in the environment. Distances can be estimated from
either RSS measurements or time-based methods. Al-
though a small subset of such works have explored the
use of Time of Flight (ToF) (Lanzisera et al., 2006)
or Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) measurements,
RSS is generally the feature of choice for indoor posi-
tioning. This is due to the fact that RSS measurements
can be obtained relatively effortlessly and inexpen-
sively. In addition, no extra hardware (e.g., ultrasonic
or infra-red) is needed for network-centric localiza-
tion (Youssef, 2004). On the other hand, bearing-
based schemes use the direction of arrival (DoA) of
a target. However, these schemes require multiple
range sensors in order to be better suited for mobile
ICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics
332