b. Reduction of processing time of
administrative work
c. Cost reduction
d. Reduction in labour costs
2. Dimension Quality Assurance
a. Improve data quality
b. Improve information quality
3. Dimension Processes
a. Improvement in productivity of field sales
force
b. Reduction in media brakes
c. Process improvement in field sales
d. Increase process automation
As an example Figure 3 displays four objectives
of field and sales service. To three of them (re-
duction in cycle time, reduction in processing time
of administrative work and cost reduction) the
respondents mostly agreed. A disagreement occurred
in the objective reduction in labour costs. In this
case many respondents mentioned that the respon-
sibility for the field sales increased and therefore
they needed more time or the free time by using the
CRM solution was used to increase the relationship
to the customers. Therefore we can summarise that
the reduction in labour is only in some cases an
objective of CRM projects.
The other mentioned objectives could be con-
firmed in the study. Very high scores were achieved
in the dimension quality assurance. More than 80 %
agreed that they could improve their data and in-
formation quality by using mobile devices in com-
bination with CRM systems.
3.4 Further Steps
To improve the result of the proposed research
model further empirical research is needed. There-
fore it would be interesting to analyse if there are
different success factors and objectives in other
CRM markets.
A further step of research would be to investigate
the interdependence between the success factors and
the achieved objectives.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The described approach displayed results of
analyzed CRM projects in companies of the business
to business sector. Based on a comprehensive
literature review success factors and achieved
objectives were collected and categorized.
A survey of 102 CRM projects in companies in
German-speaking Europe had been conducted.
Thereby a typical CRM implementation project was
described and the areas of CRM implementation
were displayed.
The paper listed the identified success factors
from literature. All factors could be confirmed by
the result of the study.
Another result of the study was to evaluate the
achieved objectives of CRM projects. Therefore it
was also important to consider the objectives of the
field sales and service and to measure them in
different dimensions. One result of this measurement
was that many respondents could not reduce their
cost of labour while using a CRM software solution
and mobile devices.
REFERENCES
Bulander, R., 2008: A Research Model of Customer Rela-
tionship Management Systems for mobile Devices. In:
Proceedings of the International Conference on E-
Business (ICE-B). INSTICC Press, Porto, Portugal,
pages 413-418.
Dyché, J., 2002. The CRM-Handbook. Addison-Wesley,
Boston.
Hampe, F. & Schwabe, G., 2002 (in German). Mobiles
Customer Relationship Management. In Reichwald, R.
(Ed.), Mobile Kommunikation, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
Hartel, M.; Bulander, R., 2006: Success Factors of mobile
CRM Projekts - An Overview. In: Proceedings of the
International Conference on E-Business (ICE-B).
INSTICC Press, Setúbal, Portugal, pages 306-311.
Hestres, L. (2003): The Influence of American Culture on
Software Design: Microsoft Outlook as a Case Study.
Working paper. Georgetown University. Georgetown.
Müller, H. D., 2004 (in German): Einsatz von Customer-
Relationship-Management-Systemen – Bestimmungs-
größen, Ausprägungen und Erfolgsfaktoren. DUV-
Verlag, Wiesbaden 2004.
Reinartz, W.; Krafft, M.; Hoyer, W. D., 2004: The
Customer Relationship Management Process: Its
Measurement and Impact on Performance. In: Journal
of Marketing Research XLI, pages 293-305.
Salomann, H., Dous, M., Kolbe, L. & Brenner, W., 2005.
Customer Relationship Management Survey – Status
Quo and Future Challenges. Institute of Information
Management at the University of St. Gallen.
ICE-B 2009 - International Conference on E-business
276