the prototype implementation and the development
of a set of application cases in real contexts. The
concretization of the application cases demonstrates
the SRM system relevance and usability in the
students’ knowledge acquisition process, in the early
identification of failure situations, in the decision-
making support in the scope of teaching/learning
processes and in the automatic interaction with the
students. The results of the implemented actions and
their impact are also presented and analysed in this
paper.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 1
summarizes the motivation for the SRM system
proposal; Section 2 includes an overview of the SRM
principles and presents the SRM concept and
practice (as it was understood in this work) and the
adopted methodology to their validation; Section 3
describes the SRM system architecture and gives
some details about the SRM system implementation.
It also describes the methodology adopted for the
SRM system validation; Section 4 describes the
application cases, analysing the impact, on the
students’ behaviour, of the several actions that were
carried out under the principles of the SRM practice;
Section 5 concludes mentioning the advantages of
the SRM system and summarizing some upcoming
tasks for future work.
2 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
The SRM system was inspired in principles
associated to the Customer Relationship
Management (CRM) systems. In short, a CRM
system is used in a business environment to support
and manage the relationship between the
organization and their customers. These systems
help to translate customer information into customer
knowledge. This customer knowledge is obtained
using the information and business transactions
available in the organizational databases. Supported
in this customer knowledge, the organization defines
strategies/activities/actions able to maintain a
stronger relationship with clients. Values like
reliance, fidelity, loyalty and durability are present
in this relationship (Payne, 2006).
The SRM system is based on the principles
described above, but supports mainly activities
related with the students and associated with the
teaching-learning processes. Underlying to the SRM
concept is the scholar success promotion, as it is
widely accepted that there exists a high correlation
between the closely monitoring of the students and
their academic success.
To exemplify the similarity between the
CRM/SRM actions, it is possible to compare the
actions developed by the customer’s manager, that
on the scope of the banking activity alerts the
customer when he/she exceeds his/her credit
account, and the actions developed by the student’s
tutor/teacher, that on the scope of the monitoring
processes sends an alert message to the student when
detects that he/she misses several lessons.
The “Student Relationship Management or SRM
or CRM in Higher Education” terms were already
used in technological/commercial environments to
refer solutions mainly dedicated to support processes
related with the students in academic areas
(students’ management information, courses and
lessons management, admissions management,
enrolment and registration management) and areas
related with available services (communications,
marketing, financial aids, accommodation) among
others (Fayerman, 2002). Moreover, these solutions
do not make possible trailing the academic path of
the students in activities concerned with the
teaching-learning processes.
In the scope of this work, it was proposed a
concept, the SRM concept, focused on the students’
academic success promotion. The SRM concept is
understood as a process based on the students’
acquired knowledge, whose main purpose is to keep
an effective student-institution relationship through
the closely monitoring of the students and their
academic activities. This concept, as already stated,
was based on the premise that there exists a strong
correlation between the closely monitoring of the
students’ academic activities and their academic
success promotion. The SRM practice is defined as a
set of activities or actions that should guarantee the
student individual contact, and an effective,
adequate and closely monitoring of his/her academic
performance. To validate the SRM concept and the
set of activities included in the SRM practice, a
research methodology based on the Grounded
Theory principles was adopted. It included the
concretization of a set of interviews (Hansen and
Kautz, 2005). The selected interviewers were
teachers with institutional responsibilities (courses
directors, institution directors, council members).
Each interview was recorded, transcribed and
analysed. The interviews analysis process was done
following the Grounded Theory principles and
supported by the NVivo software (a Computer
Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software)
(Budding and Cools, 2007). Each interview was
guided by a script, prepared beforehand, including
also open questions (semi-structured interviews).
PROMOTING STUDENTS SUCCESS WITH A BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM
47