relates to a particular technological issue in the
adoption of mobile services. This means that to
effectively encourage medical professionals to use
mobile healthcare, the provided service for pervasive
and timely usage without any difficulty should be
well prepared in the hospitals. Next, the TAM
belief (perceived usefulness) and PIIT have indicated
to be the underlying antecedents in determining
behavioral intention to use through the mediators of
attitude and perceived behavioral control respectively.
This means that both technological (perceived
usefulness) and individual issues (PIIT) are
important for overcoming the impediment of using
mobile healthcare.
For the technological aspect, the design of mobile
healthcare needs to carefully examine the functional
requirements of users and further is able to provide
useful information for helping the decision making of
medical professionals. For the individual aspect,
the hospitals may provide incentives for encouraging
medical professionals to be often kept in an
innovative manner with their regular tasks. This will
improve the willingness of an individual to take a
risk by trying out an innovation. Finally, the TPB
components, attitude, perceived behavioral control,
and subjective norm, involve the relevant
organizational and individual issues for indicating
their impact on the adoption of mobile services.
The hospital, as a type of organization’s form, should
be able to provide some training programs for
increasing the skill level of employees and nurturing
their confidence in facing new technologies.
For the researchers, prior research on information
technology acceptance in general and mobile services
in particular has been focused on the general
components of TAM or TPB. This research has
considered the roles of system services and personal
trait in the innovation acceptance. This is because
mobile healthcare with wireless features is an
emerging technology for medical professionals in
terms of high uncertainty in system services, great
change of their work styles, and real belief of its
usefulness. These considerations are particularly
important for the context of mobile healthcare. This
will provide a new thinking/concept for theoretically
defining the antecedents of behavioral intention to
use in the context of mobile healthcare.
Finally, although this research has produced some
interesting results, a number of limitations may be
inherent in it. Many studies have reported that gender
difference plays a moderating role for the
relationship between attitude, perceived behavioral
control, or subjective norm and behavioral intention
to use. Next, the response rate for this survey is lower
than desirable, despite the various efforts to improve
it. One of the reasons for this may be due to
inexperience of the respondents in using mobile
healthcare and reluctant to answer the questionnaire.
Finally, while medical doctors from larger hospitals
are always quite busy, few questionnaires may have
been completed by subordinates and therefore, the
data may have some biases.
REFERENCES
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and
operational definition of personal innovativeness in
the domain of information technology. Information
Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215.
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual
differences germane to the acceptance of new
information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2),
361–391.
Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when
you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs
about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly,
24(4), 665–694.
Asada, H., Shaltis, P., Reisner, A., Rhee, S., and
Hutchinson, R. (2003). Mobile monitoring with
wearable photoplethysmographic biosensors. IEEE
Engineering in Medical and Biology Magazine,
28–40.
Chau, P. Y. K. and Hu, P. J. (2002). Investigating healthcare
professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine
technology: an empirical test of competing theories.
Information & Management, 39, 297-311.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989).
User acceptance of computer technology: a
comparison of two theoretical models. Management
Science, 35, 982–1002.
DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and
McLean model of information systems success: a
ten-year update. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Flynn, L R. and Goldsmith, R. E. (1993). A validation of
the goldsmith and hofacker innovativeness scale.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53,
1105-1116.
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models
with unobservable variables and measurement error:
Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research,
18, 3 (1981), 382-388.
Gallivan, M. J. (2003). The influence of software
developers’ creative style on their attitudes to and
assimilation of a software process innovation.
Information & Management, 40, 443-465.
Hong, S.-J. and Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding the
adoption of multipurpose information appliances: the
case of mobile data services. Information Systems
THE ACCEPTANCE OF WIRELESS HEALTHCARE FOR INDIVIDUALS - An Integrative View
129