![](bg6.png)
adaptation system. Based on this ontology we will
develop an expert system to manage the rules of per-
ception and cognitive processing of 3D information
presentation in UAR environments and to solve the
high-level context integration. This will make the sys-
tem scalable and adaptable to different use cases and
also for mobile AR display applications.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We want to thank the DFG, the Department of
Human-Machine Systems Berlin, and prometei for
their support.
REFERENCES
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier,
S., and MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in
augmented reality. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl.,
21(6):34–47.
Bimber, O. and Raskar, R. (2005). Spatial Augmented Re-
ality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. A K Peters,
Ltd.
Chaari, T., Ejigu, D., Laforest, F., and Scuturici, V.-M.
(2007). A comprehensive approach to model and use
context for adapting applications in pervasive environ-
ments. J. Syst. Softw., 80(12):1973–1992.
Drascic, D. and Milgram, P. (1996). Perceptual issues in
augmented reality. In Stereoscopic Displays and Vir-
tual Reality Systems III, Proceedings of SPIE, number
2653, pages 123–134.
Ehnes, J. and Hirose, M. (2006). Projected reality - content
delivery right onto objects of daily life. In ICAT, pages
262–271.
Ehnes, J., Hirota, K., and Hirose, M. (2004). Projected aug-
mentation - augmented reality using rotatable video
projectors. In ISMAR ’04: Proceedings of the 3rd
IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and
Augmented Reality, pages 26–35, Washington, DC,
USA.
Ehnes, J., Hirota, K., and Hirose, M. (2005). Projected
augmentation ii — a scalable architecture for multi
projector based ar-systems based on ’projected ap-
plications’. In ISMAR ’05: Proceedings of the 4th
IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and
Augmented Reality, pages 190–191, Washington, DC,
USA.
Herbon, A. and Roetting, M. (2007). Detection and process-
ing of visual information in three-dimensional space.
MMI Interactive Journal, 12:18–26.
Jurgens, V., Cockburn, A., and Billinghurst, M. (2006).
Depth cues for augmented reality stakeout. In
CHINZ ’06: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI
New Zealand chapter’s international conference on
Computer-human interaction, pages 117–124, New
York, NY, USA. ACM.
Karamouzis, S. T. and Vrettos, A. (2007). A biocybernetic
approach for intelligent tutoring systems. In AIAP’07:
Proceedings of the 25th conference on Proceedings
of the 25th IASTED International Multi-Conference,
pages 267–271, Anaheim, CA, USA. ACTA Press.
Kim, Y. Y., Kim, E. N., Park, M. J., Park, K. S., Ko, H. D.,
and Kim, H. T. (2008). The application of biosignal
feedback for reducing cybersickness from exposure to
a virtual environment. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual En-
viron., 17(1):1–16.
Mahmud, A. A., Mubin, O., Octavia, J. R., Shahid, S.,
Yeo, L., Markopoulos, P., and Martens, J.-B. (2007).
amazed: designing an affective social game for chil-
dren. In IDC ’07: Proceedings of the 6th international
conference on Interaction design and children, pages
53–56, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Pinhanez, C. S. (2001). The everywhere displays projector:
A device to create ubiquitous graphical interfaces. In
UbiComp ’01: Proceedings of the 3rd international
conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 315–331,
London, UK. Springer-Verlag.
Romero, L., SANTIAGO, J., and CORREIA, N. (2004).
Contextual information access and storytelling in
mixed reality using hypermedia. Comput. Entertain.,
2(3):12–12.
Ward, R. D. and Marsden, P. H. (2003). Physiological re-
sponses to different web page designs. Int. J. Hum.-
Comput. Stud., 59(1-2):199–212.
Wegerich, A., Dzaack, J., and Roetting, M. (2009). Opti-
mizing virtual superimpositions: User centered design
for a UAR supported smart home system. submitted.
A CONTEXT-AWARE ADAPTATION SYSTEM FOR SPATIAL AUGMENTED REALITY PROJECTIONS
103