Figure 1: The circular motion of a turning car.
or the GPS signal is not stable, the performance of
the P-AFS will be affected.
(Morishita et al., 2007) investigate the drivers
preferences for headlight swivel angles on the
test track at the DENSO Abashiri Test Center in
Hokkaido. The preferences are then used to esti-
mate the optimal swivel angles by multiple-regression
model. Also, this study shows that the headlight
swivel should be predictive. This approach is based
on path history to determine the optimal swivel an-
gles. The system wont work if the driver does not
follow the path history or the path history is not avail-
able. Also, to locate the position of the car, a reliable
navigation system is needed.
3 KINEMATICS OF A TURNING
CAR
A simple car can be considered as a rigid boy. Adopt-
ing the symbols from (LaValle, 2006), the angular ve-
locity of the car is
˙
θ =
u
s
L
tanu
φ
(1)
When the car is turning around a corner, it per-
forms circular motion. In Figure 1, if the car is turn-
ing from point A to B in the period of time t, the angle
between point A and B at the center O is
a =
˙
θt (2)
Assume the angles of the two front wheels are the
same. The ratio between the angle of the front wheels
and the angle of the steering wheel is fixed in most
vehicles. If the ratio is r and the angle of the steering
wheel is u
α
, the angle between the tangent at point A
and the line joining point A and B is
b =
u
s
t
2L
tan(u
α
r) (3)
4 HEADLAMP DIRECTION
PREDICTION
As discussed in section 3, the position of the car on
a curved path can be predicted by Equation (3). The
point A and B in Figure 1 correspond to the current
and predicted positions of the car on a curved road.
The predicted position is a place where the driver
should pay most attention to. It should be as close
to the car as possible so that any unexpected incident
near the car can be discovered, reacted and avoided.
The distance between the current and predicted posi-
tions turns out to be the car stopping distance. If the
driver uses time t
R
to react and the car undergoes con-
stant deceleration (d) along the curved path to avoid
accident, the predicted direction of headlamp is
b =
u
s
t
R
+
u
s
d
2L
tan(u
α
r) (4)
Typically, the deceleration rate is 3.4m/sec
2
and
human reaction time is 2.5 seconds (Transportation
Research Institue, 1997). The general speed limits
in build-up areas are around 40-60km/h (Legislative
Council Panel On Transport, 1999). Based on the car
configuration, the possible range of headlamp direc-
tions can be calculated by Equation (4). Then, an ar-
ray of headlamps, in which each headlamp has a con-
tinuous illuminating angle, can be installed in the car.
Each headlamp can be switched on according to the
instantaneous speed u
s
and the steering wheel angle
u
α
of the car.
The instantaneous speed can be easily obtained
from the speedometer of the car. To measure the steer-
ing wheel angle of the car, two accelerometers are
used to provide an accurate and stable angle.
4.1 Steering Wheel Angle Measurement
To measure the angle of the steering wheel, a two-
axis accelerometer (A1) is attached to the center of
the steering wheel with the x-y plane parallel to the
steering wheel plane. Another two-axis accelerome-
ter (A2) is installed such that one axis is parallel to
the line of intersection of the ground plane and the
steering wheel plane.
Initially, the X-axis and Y-axis of the accelerom-
eter A1 are placed horizontally and vertically on the
steering wheel surface respectively. The horizontal
acceleration A
h
of the car is measured by A2. If the
X-axis and Y-axis acceleration rates measured by A1
are A
x
and A
y
respectively, the steering wheel angle
u
α
is
u
α
= arctan
A
x
A
y
− arcsin
A
h
q
A
2
x
+ A
2
y
(5)
4.2 Steering Wheel Angle Stabilization
To stabilize the sensor readings measured by A1 and
A2, a running average algorithm with T data points is
AUTOMATIC HEADLAMP SWITCHING SYSTEM USING ACCELEROMETERS
489