
 
same sensors after the hybridization. Based on these 
results, detection of hybridization event is evident.  
Similar experiment could not be carried out for  
BSC sensors, most probably due to high impedance 
through the doped silicon structure. Accordingly, 
hybridization was detected using square wave 
voltammetry  (SWV),  using  methylene  blue  as  a  
redox marker. Again, obtained data confirm the 
immobilization of ssDNA on the gold surface, as 
indicated by redox potential shift (ΔE = 0.013V). 
Further shift in redox potential (ΔE = 0.028V) 
confirms that hybridization of receptor DNA layer 
with sample ssDNA takes place.  
3.3 UO
2
2+
 Detection 
It was reported recently that uranyl cation can cause 
DNA damage, especially in the presence of ascorbic 
acid (AA) (Yazzie et al., 2003). Many people can be 
potentially exposed to UO
2
2+
 through uranium 
mining, processing, the resulting mine tailings, and 
the use of depleted uranium in the military. Thus, 
determination of uranyl cation is very important 
from the clinical point of view. Based on the 
reported cleavage effect of UO
2
2+
/AA on DNA, 
efforts were undertaken to devise uranyl sensor 
taking advantage of the degradation of DNA self-
assembled monolayer, deposited on the BSC 
transducers. Surprisingly, UO
2
2+
 had no effect on the 
monolayer, even in the presence of ascorbic acid, as 
observed using impedance spectroscopy and SWV. 
Currently, work is in progress in our laboratory to 
elucidate this unsuspected behavior.  
4 CONCLUSIONS 
Silicon-based transducers with vacuum deposited 
gold were found to be useful for the construction of 
DNA sensors, mainly due to perfectly smooth 
surface of gold working electrode. Produced sensors, 
modified with oligonucleotide self-assembled 
monolayer, were shown to detect chosen DNA 
sequence. Efforts to determine UO
2
2+
 cation using 
the same sensors were unsuccessful.  
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
This work was financed by the Polish Ministry of 
Science and Higher Education within a framework 
of the Operational Programme – Innovative 
Economy, Priority I, Action 1.3, Sub-Action 1.3.1, 
Project No. POIG.01.03.01-00-014/08-00. 
REFERENCES 
Luong, J. H. T., Male, K. B., Glennon, J. D., 2008. 
Biosensor technology: Technology push versus market 
pull. In Biotechnol. Adv.  
Andreescu, S., Sadik O. A., 2004. Trends and challenges 
in biochemical sensors for clinical and environmental 
monitoring. In Pure Appl. Chem.  
Wang, J., 2000. Analytical electrochemistry, Wiley-VCH. 
New York, 2
nd
 edition. 
Hianik, T., Wang, J., 2009. Electrochemical Aptasensors - 
Recent Achievements and Perspectives. In 
Electroanalysis. 
Erdem, A., Ozsoz, M., 2002. Electrochemical DNA 
Biosensors Based on DNA-Drug Interactions. In 
Electroanalysis. 
Ziolkowski, R., Gorski, L., Zaborowski, M., Malinowska, 
E., 2010. Application of mass fabricated silicon-based 
gold transducers for amperometric biosensors. In 
Bioelectrochemistry. 
Kelley, S.O., Barton, J. K., Jackson, N. M., Hill, M. G., 
1997. Electrochemistry of Methylene Blue Bound to a 
DNA-Modified Electrode. In Bioconjugate Chem.  
Yazzie, M., Gamble, S. L., Civitello, E. R., Stearns D. M., 
2003. Uranyl Acetate Causes DNA Single Strand 
Breaks In Vitro in the Presence of Ascorbate (Vitamin 
C). In Chem. Res. Toxicol.  
 
SILICON-BASED GOLD TRANSDUCERS FOR DNA BIOSENSORS
149