same sensors after the hybridization. Based on these
results, detection of hybridization event is evident.
Similar experiment could not be carried out for
BSC sensors, most probably due to high impedance
through the doped silicon structure. Accordingly,
hybridization was detected using square wave
voltammetry (SWV), using methylene blue as a
redox marker. Again, obtained data confirm the
immobilization of ssDNA on the gold surface, as
indicated by redox potential shift (ΔE = 0.013V).
Further shift in redox potential (ΔE = 0.028V)
confirms that hybridization of receptor DNA layer
with sample ssDNA takes place.
3.3 UO
2
2+
Detection
It was reported recently that uranyl cation can cause
DNA damage, especially in the presence of ascorbic
acid (AA) (Yazzie et al., 2003). Many people can be
potentially exposed to UO
2
2+
through uranium
mining, processing, the resulting mine tailings, and
the use of depleted uranium in the military. Thus,
determination of uranyl cation is very important
from the clinical point of view. Based on the
reported cleavage effect of UO
2
2+
/AA on DNA,
efforts were undertaken to devise uranyl sensor
taking advantage of the degradation of DNA self-
assembled monolayer, deposited on the BSC
transducers. Surprisingly, UO
2
2+
had no effect on the
monolayer, even in the presence of ascorbic acid, as
observed using impedance spectroscopy and SWV.
Currently, work is in progress in our laboratory to
elucidate this unsuspected behavior.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Silicon-based transducers with vacuum deposited
gold were found to be useful for the construction of
DNA sensors, mainly due to perfectly smooth
surface of gold working electrode. Produced sensors,
modified with oligonucleotide self-assembled
monolayer, were shown to detect chosen DNA
sequence. Efforts to determine UO
2
2+
cation using
the same sensors were unsuccessful.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was financed by the Polish Ministry of
Science and Higher Education within a framework
of the Operational Programme – Innovative
Economy, Priority I, Action 1.3, Sub-Action 1.3.1,
Project No. POIG.01.03.01-00-014/08-00.
REFERENCES
Luong, J. H. T., Male, K. B., Glennon, J. D., 2008.
Biosensor technology: Technology push versus market
pull. In Biotechnol. Adv.
Andreescu, S., Sadik O. A., 2004. Trends and challenges
in biochemical sensors for clinical and environmental
monitoring. In Pure Appl. Chem.
Wang, J., 2000. Analytical electrochemistry, Wiley-VCH.
New York, 2
nd
edition.
Hianik, T., Wang, J., 2009. Electrochemical Aptasensors -
Recent Achievements and Perspectives. In
Electroanalysis.
Erdem, A., Ozsoz, M., 2002. Electrochemical DNA
Biosensors Based on DNA-Drug Interactions. In
Electroanalysis.
Ziolkowski, R., Gorski, L., Zaborowski, M., Malinowska,
E., 2010. Application of mass fabricated silicon-based
gold transducers for amperometric biosensors. In
Bioelectrochemistry.
Kelley, S.O., Barton, J. K., Jackson, N. M., Hill, M. G.,
1997. Electrochemistry of Methylene Blue Bound to a
DNA-Modified Electrode. In Bioconjugate Chem.
Yazzie, M., Gamble, S. L., Civitello, E. R., Stearns D. M.,
2003. Uranyl Acetate Causes DNA Single Strand
Breaks In Vitro in the Presence of Ascorbate (Vitamin
C). In Chem. Res. Toxicol.
SILICON-BASED GOLD TRANSDUCERS FOR DNA BIOSENSORS
149